On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Online Platforms 2017: Hot Topics in Liability & Social Responsibility

Released on: Nov. 6, 2017
Running Time: 06:57:15

The Internet and networked technologies have spawned many new business models that arise from empowering consumers and satisfying their desires, providing products or services that bring individuals and businesses together in new marketplaces, shaking up old industries and networks, and creating new business opportunities and challenges. New technologies and online platforms are changing our lives, economy, and society in dramatic ways.

This program will address some of the hottest legal and policy topics that online platforms have brought to the fore:  free speech, hate speech, fake news, privacy and surveillance, artificial intelligence, augmented reality, changing notions of “ownership” of information and software-enabled consumer products, and the perennial issue of copyright.  It will also discuss international legal and policy tensions affecting global technologies and organizations.  Those who view this program will learn from experienced and insightful experts and pioneers in these important and fast-moving fields.

You will learn:

  • Online platforms as deputies for enforcement and the rule of law
  • Case law and regulation developments in the U.S. and EU
  • Jurisdictional conflicts and rivalries in a connected world
  • Augmented reality versus real reality: who owns what?
  • The rivalry between IP and personal property rights: contracts and terms of use
  • Listen to our panel of in-house counsel discuss hot topics and provide practical advice

This program will benefit anyone who advises online platforms or marketplaces or consumer technology developers, who litigate for or against them, and who invests in new business or technology models or advises those investors. It will also benefit those who practice intellectual property law, technology law, media law, corporate law for startup or emerging growth companies, regulatory law, and litigation. This program features dynamic speakers and audience interaction.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:57:15]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.


  • Opening Remarks and Introduction* [00:12:50]
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Fake News, Freedoms of Expression and Assembly, Online Moderation, and Algorithms [01:28:30]
    Andrew P. Bridges, Eileen Donahoe, Brittan Heller
  • U.S. and EU Developments and International Conflicts in Online Platforms [01:30:10]
    Daphne Keller, Laurent Crenshaw, Graham Smith
  • Copyright Infringement Doctrines and Safe Harbors for Technology and Platform Providers [01:04:05]
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Who Owns the Future?: The Future of Ownership and the Conflict Between Tangible and Intangible Property [01:13:50]
    Tyler G. Newby, Aaron Perzanowski, Catherine R. Gellis
  • Online Platforms: The In-House Perspective on Hot Issues and Themes of the Day [01:27:50]
    Laura H. Covington, Doug Kramer, Justin Olsson, Stephen Laporte

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:


  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • United Nations, General Assembly, Human Rights Council, 35th Session, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression (June 2017)
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Response in Opposition to Motion to Show Cause, In re Search of www.disruptj20.org, No. 17 CSW 3438 (D.C. Super. Ct. 2017)
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Complaint, U.S. v. Gutenberg, No.16-0521 (Mar. 21, 2017) (Fake Lawsuit)
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Ranking Digital Rights, 2017 Corporate Accountability Index (March 2017)
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • David L. Hayes, Fenwick & West LLP, Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet (August 2017)
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Matthew Prince, “Why We Terminated Daily Stormer,” Cloudflare (August 16, 2017), https://blog.cloudflare.com/why-we-terminated-daily-stormer/
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • University of Geneva, Geneva Internet Disputes Resolution Policies 1.0 (June 2015)
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Internet & Jurisdiction, Content & Jurisdiction Program: Cross-Border Content Takedown, Problem Framing (May 2017)
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Internet & Jurisdiction, Data & Jurisdiction Program: Cross-Border Access to User Data, Problem Framing (May 2017)
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, HiQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corp., No. 17-cv-03301-EMC (N.D. Cal. 2017)
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Graham Smith, “Time to speak up for Article 15,” Cyberleagle (May 21, 2017), http://cyberleagle.com/2017/05/time-to-speak-up-for-article-15.html
    Graham Smith
  • Cory Doctorow, “Sole and Despotic Dominion: how a 20th century copyright law is abolishing property for humans (but not corporations),” BoingBoing.net (November 3, 2016), https://boingboing.net/2016/11/03/sole-and-despotic-dominion-ho.html
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Aaron Perzanowski and Jason Schultz, “Do you own the software that runs your Tesla?” (November 4, 2016)
    Aaron Perzanowski

Presentation Material


  • U.S. and EU Developments and International Conflicts in Online Platforms
    Graham Smith
  • U.S. and EU Developments and International Conflicts in Online Platforms
    Daphne Keller
  • Copyright Infringement Doctrines and Safe Harbors for Technology and Platform Providers
    Andrew P. Bridges
  • Who Owns the Future?: The Future of Ownership and the Conflict Between Tangible and Intangible Property
    Aaron Perzanowski
  • Who Owns the Future?: The Future of Ownership and the Conflict Between Tangible and Intangible Property
    Catherine R. Gellis
  • Who Owns the Future?: The Future of Ownership and the Conflict Between Tangible and Intangible Property
    Tyler G. Newby
Chairperson(s)
Andrew P. Bridges ~ Fenwick & West LLP
Speaker(s)
Laura H. Covington ~ Product Policy Director, Facebook
Laurent Crenshaw ~ Public Policy, Yelp Inc.
Eileen Donahoe ~ Executive Director, Stanford Global Digital Policy Incubator, Stanford University
Catherine R. Gellis ~ Attorney/Outside Policy Counsel,
Brittan Heller ~ Director of Technology and Society, Center for Technology and Society, Silicon Valley
Daphne Keller ~ Director of Intermediary Liability, The Center for Internet and Society Stanford Law School
Douglas Kramer ~ General Counsel, Cloudflare Inc.
Stephen Laporte ~ Legal Director, Wikimedia Foundation
Tyler G. Newby ~ Fenwick & West LLP
Justin Olsson ~ Senior Legal Counsel, Databricks
Aaron Perzanowski ~ Professor of Law, Case Western Reserve University
Graham Smith ~ Bird & Bird LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 3 on-demand credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “A/V” credit. Attorneys are limited to 22.5 credits of A/V programs per reporting period.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Online Platforms 2017: Hot Topics in Liability & Social Responsibility Andrew P Bridges, Fenwick & West LLP
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.