transcript   Transcript

Pay Equity in Law Practice

Recorded on: Sep. 14, 2018
Running Time: 01:01:30

Full Transcript:



If you are a Privileged Member, just log in and start reading now! If you are not a Privileged Member, please click here to learn how unlimited access to PLI programs may be right for you and your firm.

To access the streaming media of this presentation, please purchase the corresponding seminar segment.

Taken from the Web Program Cutting-Edge Employment Law Issues 2018: The California Difference Recorded September 2018 in San Francisco

Pay Equity in Law Practice [01:01:30]
  • Case law update on pay equity issues
  • New state laws targeting pay equity issues
  • Avoiding and remedying pay equity issues
  • Special pay equity issues facing law firms

Erin M. Connell,  Deborah K. Marcuse

The purchase price of this Web Program segment includes the following article from the Course Handbook available online:
  • Suits By Suits: Equal Pay Developments and Implications for Law Firms (June 2018)
    Erin M. Connell
  • Second Amended Class Action, Collective Action, and Individual Complaint, Campbell, et al. v. Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP, et al., Civ. No. 1:16-CV-06832 (JPO)(BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 3, 2017)
    David Sanford
  • Order re Discovery Disputes, Campbell, et al. v. Chadbourne & Parke LLP, et al., No. 1:16-CV-06832 (JPO)(BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 16, 2017)
    David Sanford
  • Order re Document Request No. 40, Campbell, et al. v. Chadbourne & Parke LLP, et al., No. 1:16-CV-06832 (JPO)(BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 25, 2017)
    David Sanford
  • Notice of Consent Motion for Approval of Settlement of, and Dismissal of, Plaintiffs’ Equal Pay Act Claims, Campbell, et al. v. Chadbourne & Parke LLP, et al., No. 1:16-CV-06832 (JPO)(BCM) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 14, 2018)
    David Sanford
  • First Amended Class and Collective Action Complaint, Knepper, et al. v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C, et al., No. 3:18-CV-00303-WHO (N.D. Cal. May 11, 2018)
    David Sanford
  • Declaratory Judgement Complaint, Demand for Jury Trial, Knepper, et al. v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C, et al., No. 3:18-CV-00304 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2018)
    David Sanford
  • Defendant’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a); Memorandum of Points and Authorities, Knepper, et al. v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C, et al., No. 3:18-CV-00303-WHO (N.D. Cal. Apr. 27, 2018)
    David Sanford
  • Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Defendant Ogletree’s Motion to Transfer Venue, Knepper, et al. v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C, et al., No. 3:18-CV-00303-WHO (N.D. Cal. May 25, 2018)
    David Sanford
  • Defendant’s Reply in Support of Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), Knepper, et al. v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C, et al., No. 3:18-CV-00303-WHO (N.D. Cal. June 6, 2018)
    David Sanford
  • Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Its Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Its Motion to Transfer Venue Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), Knepper, et al. v. Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C, et al., No. 3:18-CV-00303-WHO (N.D. Cal. June 6, 2018)
    David Sanford
  • First Amended Complaint, Bertram v. Proskauer Rose LLP, No.1:17-CV-00901-ABJ (D.D.C. Apr. 25, 2018)
    David Sanford
  • Class and Collective Action Complaint, Demand for Jury Trial, Doe, et al. v. Morrison & Foerster, LLP, No. 3:18- CV-02542 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 30, 2018)
    David Sanford
Presentation Material
  • Pay Equity in Law
    Erin M. Connell, Deborah K. Marcuse
  • (s)
    Erin M. Connell ~ Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
    Deborah K. Marcuse ~ Sanford Heisler Sharp, LLP
    Share
    Email
    Transcript FAQ's
    • How Can I Access Transcripts?
      You must be a Member in good standing.

    • Can I access the Video?
      Yes, you can access the video if you have the Adobe Flash plugin installed. Click on the video camera icon when you mouse over each paragraph. The media will begin playback at that point.

    • Can I get CLE credit for reading the transcript?
      No, CLE credit cannot be earned for reading a transcript. CLE credit is issued only for verified attendance while watching a web program. If seeking credit, please verify the program's eligibility for credit and expiration date in your jurisdiction on the web segment launch page before commencing the program.
    
    • FOLLOW PLI:
    • twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    • RSS

    All Contents Copyright © 1996-2019 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

    © 2019 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.