On-Demand   On-Demand One-Hour Briefing

Hype or Help? How Can Alternative Fee Arrangements Add Demonstrable Value to Your Practice and Your Clients? (Audio-only)

Recorded on: Jul. 3, 2012
Running Time: 01:06:51

This program has expired for credit in many states. Please check the credit calculator to the right. No certificate will be issued if credit has expired in your state.

Taken from the briefing Hype or Help? How Can Alternative Fee Arrangements Add Demonstrable Value to Your Practice and Your Clients? recorded June 2012.

The discussion of AFA's (aka alternative fee arrangements or value-based fees), is no longer a discussion of "alternatives" as much as it is a discussion of "appropriate" fee arrangements: namely, legal pricing and cost models that focus on finding and focusing on the value of legal work, rather than simply multiplying hours X rates.  There are some who'd even go so far as to suggest that AFA's are nothing more than a reflection of a good, "sticky" budget with a well-scoped project plan.  Where are you in thinking about or adapting to this major shift in the business model of pricing, staffing, and delivering value-based legal work?  Given that there is no "one-size-fits-all" prescription for fee models; given that many lawyers are risk-averse when it comes to adopting progressive business models; and given that there is still a significant amount of skepticism or reticence to leave well-understood hourly models behind (in both client law departments and law firms), how will you make sense of all these varied options and figure out what's right for you, your firm, and your clients?

In this introductory-level session, Susan J. Hackett of Legal Executive Leadership, LLC (former SVP & GC of the Association of Corporate Counsel - ACC) will help you examine the options for moving from theory to practice in implementing AFAs.  She will help you - even if you are not expert (yet!) - to understand how recognized leaders implementing AFAs assess which kinds of options are right for a variety of practices, benchmark how non–hourly fee options have worked in other firms and for clients, as well as begin to think about the kinds of practical steps (and the variety of scaled efforts) you can take to get started.  Susan's experience in offering this overview stems from her widely–recognized leadership in bringing together hundreds of firms and thousands of clients to collaborate on the first major professional project to reconnect the cost of legal services with the value of the work provided: the ACC Value Challenge.  She's addressed hundreds of audiences on this topic, and developed some of the ground-breaking resources that have transformed firm and department processes and practices to focus on new ways to price legal work.

Lecture Topics  [Total Time: 01:06:51]

  • Understand how greater facility with a wider variety of legal pricing/fee mechanisms provides your law department or law firm with a strategic advantage and a more distinguishable value proposition
  • Learn the basics of different kinds of fee structures, and how they are used by a variety of clients and firms to drive value and greater collaboration in their relationships
  • Re-align the important connections between pricing and your practice expertise, your internal staffing models, the processes you deploy to improve the efficient delivery of more consistent results, and your ability to manage projects better
  • Examine how clients and firms that don't enjoy Fortune 100 / AmLaw 100 status are nonetheless leveraging the value of their work through AFAs
  • Consider how you can re-tool your personal service model to focus on providing valued results, rather than a stack of hours
  • Think about adopting metrics, driving comparative assessments, and caching improved data which flow from your new pricing models, and how this kind of knowledge can improve your firm or department's internal and external evaluation process

Presentation Material

  • Hype or Help? How Can Alternative Fee Arrangements Add Demonstrable Value to Your Practice and Your Clients? - Legal Executive Leadership
    Susan J. Hackett
  • Hype or Help? How Can Alternative Fee Arrangements Add Demonstrable Value to Your Practice and Your Clients?
    Susan J. Hackett
Speaker(s)
Susan J. Hackett ~ Legal Executive Leadership, LLC
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand one-hour briefings can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand one-hour briefings. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand one-hour briefings.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “non-traditional” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of non-traditional programs per reporting period.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 3 on-demand credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “A/V” credit. Attorneys are limited to 22.5 credits of A/V programs per reporting period.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand one-hour briefings.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand one-hour briefings vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “QAS Self-Study” credit. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand one-hour briefings may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

 

Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • GooglePlus
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2017 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2017 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.