On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Cross-Border Employment Law 2018

Released on: Jun. 13, 2018
Running Time: 06:29:09
Employment law is no longer a local issue. Global employers demand global solutions. To begin with, multinationals must grapple with often conflicting standards for hiring, retaining, disciplining, and terminating employees.

Multinationals also require coordinated global policies on time management, diversity and pay equity, executive compensation and internal investigations as well. In addition, employment law professionals are more frequently called upon to assist their multinationals clients and employers on cross-border acquisitions and divestitures, and the labor and employment laws that may either help or hinder those plans.

This program brings together highly experienced and sophisticated practitioners, in-house counsel, and senior human resources executives from around the world. They will present, in a practical way, how best to advise the multinational employer on these critical issues and more.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:29:09]
Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.
  • Opening Remarks* [00:06:14]
    Philip M. Berkowitz
  • Cross-Border Investigations: Case Study: When Employees and Employers Act Badly [01:04:35]
    Philip M. Berkowitz, Isabel Franco, Michael D. Mann, Martin L. Schmelkin
  • Employee Terminations Across Borders [01:00:26]
    Roselyn S. Sands, Linda Liang, Carolina Tavares Rodrigues, Clive Howard
  • International Executive Compensation Hot Topics [01:02:50]
    Wendi S. Lazar, Hironobu Tsukamoto, Alistair Woodland, Susan P. Serota
  • Global Diversity and Pay Equity [00:59:27]
    Nicola Rabson, Louise Patry, Jenny Welander Wadström
  • Gig Economy: Can the Law Catch Up with the New Reality? [01:15:00]
    Andrez S. Carberry, Melanie Crowley, Anders Etgen Reitz, Dr. Gerlind Wisskirchen
  • Ethical Challenges Associated With Technology, Privacy and Employee Monitoring [01:00:37]
    Catherine LaChapelle, Philip L. Gordon, Rajko Herrmann, Orrie Dinstein

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Investigations Guidance for Multi-Nationals
    Philip M. Berkowitz
  • Brazil’s “Whistleblower Act” and the Necessary Ethical Maturity for Its Effective Implementation
    Isabel Franco
  • Michael D. Mann and Michael P. Morrissey, Managing the Legal and Cultural Boundaries of Cross-Border Internal Corporate Investigations
    Michael D. Mann
  • Martin L. Schmelkin, Justin D. Martin, Ira Handa, Cross-Border Investigations: Legal and Cultural Considerations in the #MeToo Era (March 2018)
    Martin L. Schmelkin
  • Employee Terminations in the UK—The Claims and Legal Processes (March 16, 2018)
    Clive Howard
  • Termination Strategy and Dispute Resolution under Chinese Law (March 12, 2018)
    Linda Liang
  • Carolina Tavares Rodrigues and Bruno Malfatti, Employment Termination in Brazil: What You Need to Know (March 16, 2018)
    Carolina Tavares Rodrigues
  • What’s New in French Termination of Employment Law? A Lot!
    Roselyn S. Sands
  • Wendi S. Lazar and Katherine Blostein, Executive Employment Agreements
    Wendi S. Lazar
  • Executive Compensation and Issues Relating to Executives in Japan (March 16, 2018)
    Hironobu Tsukamoto
  • Gender Pay Gap Reporting (March 16, 2018)
    Alistair Woodland
  • Louise Patry and Pascale Nguyen, Pay Equity in Canada
    Louise Patry
  • Nicola Rabson and Philippa O’Malley, Global Diversity and Pay Equity—The Legal Framework in England and Wales (March 16, 2018)
    Nicola Rabson
  • Jenny Welander Wadström and Elin Osbeck, Parental Leave and Equality: The Right to Combine Family Life with Work Life or a Career?
    Jenny Welander Wadström
  • Melanie Crowley and John Milligan, Gig Economy: Can the Law Catch Up with the New Reality?
    Melanie Crowley
  • Uberization: The Need for Clear Rules in the Field of On Demand-Work (March 12, 2018)
    Anders Etgen Reitz
  • The Working World of Tomorrow and Its Impact on the Labor Market and Organizations (March 15, 2018)
    Gerlind Wisskirchen
  • Philip L. Gordon and Jennifer L. Taiwo, Pushing Attorney-Client Privilege to the Borderline: What In-House Counsel Need to Know
    Philip L. Gordon
  • The General Data Protection Regulation and Its Influence on Internal Law Firm Data Protection Compliance Measures with Respect to Germany’s Professional Rules and Ethical Obligations
    Rajko Herrmann

Presentation Material

  • Cross-Border Investigations, Case Study
    Philip M. Berkowitz, Isabel Franco, Michael D. Mann, Martin L. Schmelkin, Frances Phillips Taft
  • Employment Terminations Across Borders
    Clive Howard , Linda Liang, Carolina Tavares Rodrigues , Roselyn S. Sands
  • International Executive Compensation
    Wendi S. Lazar, Susan P. Serota, Hironobu Tsukamoto, Alistair Woodland
  • FATCA Creates New Issues for Cross-Border Stock and Other Incentive Compensation Plans
  • Five Things Employers Should Know About Tax Reform
  • Comparison of Form 8938 and FBAR Requirements
  • Top Ten Emerging Trends in Pay Ratio Disclosure
  • Global Diversity and Pay Equity
    Louise Patry, Nicola Rabson, Jenny Welander Wadström
  • Gig Economy: Can the Law Catch Up with the New Reality?
    Andrez S. Carberry
  • Ethical Challenges Associated with Technology, Privacy and Employee Monitoring
    Philip L. Gordon, Rajko Herrmann
Chairperson(s)
Philip M. Berkowitz ~ Littler Mendelson, P.C.
Speaker(s)
Andrez S. Carberry ~ Associate General Counsel, Region Counsel and Head of Risk Management , U.S. Foods, Inc.
Melanie Crowley ~ Mason Hayes & Curran
Orrie Dinstein ~ Global Chief Privacy Officer , Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.
Isabel Franco ~ KLA - Koury Lopes Advogados
Philip L. Gordon ~ Littler Mendelson, P.C.
Rajko Herrmann ~ Vangard Arbeitsrecht
Clive Howard ~ Slater and Gordon (UK) LLP
Catherine LaChapelle ~ Associate General Counsel, Labor & Employment, Molex, LLC
Wendi S. Lazar ~ Outten & Golden LLP
Linda Liang ~ King & Wood Mallesons
Michael D. Mann ~ Sidley Austin LLP
Louise Patry ~ Davies Ward Phillips & Vineberg LLP
Nicola Rabson ~ Linklaters LLP
Carolina Tavares Rodrigues ~ Brazil Labour & Employment Senior Counsel , GE
Roselyn S. Sands ~ Dual Qualified Attorney at Law U.S. & France - Global Labor & Employment Law Markets Leader, EY Societe d' Avocats
Martin L. Schmelkin ~ Jones Day
Susan P. Serota ~ Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Hironobu Tsukamoto ~ Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu NY LLP
Jenny Welander Wadström ~ Roschier Advokatbyrå
Alistair Woodland ~ Clifford Chance LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 3 on-demand credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “A/V” credit. Attorneys are limited to 22.5 credits of A/V programs per reporting period.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Cross-Border Employment Law 2018 Philip M Berkowitz, Littler Mendelson, P.C.
 
International Employment Law 2017 Philip M Berkowitz, Littler Mendelson P.C.
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.