On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Pretrial Practice 2018

Released on: May. 10, 2018
Running Time: 06:25:36

Pretrial practice in federal civil litigation continues to change. As fewer civil cases are tried, the staples of pretrial practice — pleadings, motions to dismiss, discovery, Daubert motions, summary judgment, and settlement — have replaced trials as the focus of litigation. What does the changing nature of pretrial practice in litigation mean for your practice? Join our faculty of experienced plaintiffs’ and defense attorneys, inside counsel, judges and others as they review what you need to know to succeed at this increasingly important stage of litigation.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:25:36]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:02:54]
    David G. Keyko
  • Preparing to File a Lawsuit [01:07:17]
    Hon. Henry Pitman, Steven R. Schindler, John M. Toriello
  • Responding to a Complaint [01:00:33]
    David A. Crichlow, Hon. Peggy Kuo, Amy F. Melican, Jacqueline P. Rubin
  • Part 1: Preliminary Remedies and Summary Judgment Motions [01:15:24]
    Lauren E. Aguiar, Robert S. Fischler, Carolina A. Fornos, Hon. Robert W. Lehrburger
  • Depositions [01:01:57]
    Kenneth J. Brown, Bryce L. Friedman, Hon. Steven M. Gold
  • Use of Experts [00:56:53]
    Lucy P. Allen, Ethan E. Litwin, Hon. Barbara Moses
  • Settlement [01:00:38]
    Marla Alhadeff, Jonathan J. Ross, Mark E. Segall, Hon. Leda Dunn Wettre

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Navigating Federal Courts: Practical and Strategic Considerations for Commencing an Action (March 2018)
    John M. Toriello, Sean P. Barry, Sheila (Qian) Shen, Caitlin L. Stachon
  • Responding to a Complaint (Substantive Outline) (2017)
    David A. Crichlow, Rowan D. Wilson
  • The TRO Remedy Takes Center Stage in the Early Days of the New Administration (2017)
    Lauren E. Aguiar
  • Discovery (2017)
    Carolina A. Fornos, William M. Bloss
  • Preliminary Injunctions and Temporary Restraining Orders (Updated February 2018)
    Robert S. Fischler
  • Taking and Defending Depositions (March 6, 2018)
    Bryce L. Friedman
  • Use of Experts in Pretrial Practice (March 2018)
    Lucy P. Allen
  • Strategies, Insights and Resources for Effective Settlement Negotiations (March 4, 2018)
    Jonathan J. Ross
  • JAMS Comprehensive Arbitration Rules & Procedures (Effective July 1, 2014)
    Mark E. Segall
  • JAMS Clause Workbook, A Guide to Drafting Dispute Resolution Clauses for Commercial Contracts (Effective April 1, 2015)
    Mark E. Segall

Presentation Material

  • Duking it Out: Preparing to File a Lawsuit
    Hon. Henry Pitman, Steven R. Schindler, John M. Toriello
  • Duking it Out: Responding to a Complaint
    David A. Crichlow, Hon. Peggy Kuo, Amy F. Melican, Jacqueline P. Rubin
  • Duking it Out: Preliminary Remedies, Preparing Discovery Demands and Discovery Responses, and Summary Judgement Motions
    Lauren E. Aguiar, Robert S. Fischler, Carolina A. Fornos, Hon. Robert W. Lehrburger
  • Duking it Out: Taking and Defending Depositions
    Kenneth J. Brown, Bryce L. Friedman, Hon. Steven M. Gold
  • Duking it Out: Use of Experts
    Lucy P. Allen, Ethan E. Litwin, Hon. Barbara Moses
  • Duking it Out: Settlement
    Marla Alhadeff, Hon. Leda Dunn Wettre, Jonathan J. Ross, Mark E. Segall
Chairperson(s)
David G. Keyko ~ Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Speaker(s)
Lauren E. Aguiar ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Marla Alhadeff ~ Deputy General Counsel, Global Head of Litigation and Suspicious Activity Reporting, The Bank of New York Mellon
Lucy P. Allen ~ Managing Director , NERA Economic Consulting
Kenneth J. Brown ~ Williams & Connolly LLP
David A. Crichlow ~ Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Hon. Leda Dunn Wettre ~ U.S. Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey
Robert S. Fischler ~ Ropes & Gray LLP
Carolina A. Fornos ~ Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Bryce L. Friedman ~ Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Hon. Steven M. Gold ~ Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Hon. Peggy Kuo ~ Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Hon. Robert W. Lehrburger ~ United States Magistrate Judge , United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Ethan E. Litwin ~ Dechert LLP
Amy F. Melican ~ Vice President, Deputy General Counsel, Tapestry, Inc.
Hon. Barbara Moses ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Hon. Henry Pitman ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jonathan J. Ross ~ Susman Godfrey LLP
Jacqueline P. Rubin ~ Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Steven R. Schindler ~ Schindler Cohen & Hochman LLP
Mark E. Segall ~ Mediator and Arbitrator, JAMS
John M. Toriello ~ Holland & Knight LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

Pretrial Practice 2019 (New York, NY) Apr. 8, 2019

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Pretrial Practice 2018 David G. Keyko, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.