On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Hedge Fund Management 2018

Released on: Nov. 23, 2018
Running Time: 06:25:18

At this program, our expert faculty will focus on common structures for hedge funds, SEC priorities, the regulatory environment surrounding hedge funds, and the day-to-day operational issues of running hedge funds.   There will also be in depth analysis of data privacy issues and the evolving cryptocurrency space.  Attorneys, hedge fund counsel, compliance and other professionals currently working in or interested in the hedge fund industry will benefit from this program.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:25:18]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:13:42]
    Leor Landa
  • Hedge Fund Registration and Compliance [01:12:12]
    Mark Polemeni, David L. Zimmerman
  • Hedge Fund Structures [01:16:07]
    Olga Gutman, Caroline Williams
  • Hot Topics for Hedge Fund Managers [01:14:33]
    Ryan VanGrack, Anthony S. Kelly, Ian Conlon
  • Digital Currency Funds: Regulatory and Other Considerations [00:59:12]
    Sarah R. Davidoff, Gregory S. Rowland, Andrew N. Siegel
  • Data Security and Privacy: Practical Issues Affecting Hedge Funds [01:29:30]
    Erin Ross, Jon Frankel, Matthew Shoenthal, Alex Scheinman

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Leor Landa, James H. R. Windels, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Ch. 3: Adviser Exams: Mitigating Enforcement Risks, Global Legal Group, The International Comparative Legal Guide to: Alternative Investment Funds 2018, 6th Edition
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsletter, Investment Management Regulatory Update (October 31, 2017)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Memorandum, SEC Issues Three No-Action Letters to Facilitate Cross-Border Implementation of MiFID II’s Research Provisions (November 6, 2017)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsletter, Investment Management Regulatory Update (November 28, 2017)
    Leor Landa
  • Dalia Blass, Director, Division of Investment Management, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Speech, Keynote Address Before the ICI Securities Law Developments Conference (December 7, 2017)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsletter, Investment Management Regulatory Update (December 21, 2017)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsletter, Investment Management Regulatory Update (January 30, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsletter, Investment Management Regulatory Update (February 28, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Memorandum, SEC Announces Self-Reporting Initiative for Rule 12b-1 Fee Disclosures (March 15, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Dalia Blass, Director, Division of Investment Management, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Speech, Keynote Address Before the ICI 2018 Mutual Funds and Investment Management Conference (March 19, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsletter, Investment Management Regulatory Update (March 30, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, National Exam Program Risk Alert, Overview of the Most Frequent Advisory Fee and Expense Compliance Issues Identified in Examinations of Investment Advisers, Volume VII, Issue 2 (April 12, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsletter, Investment Management Regulatory Update (April 30, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Dalia Blass, Director, Division of Investment Management, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Speech, Remarks at the PLI Investment Management Institute 2018 (April 30, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Memorandum, SEC Proposes Enhanced Standards for Advice to Retail Investors (May 7, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsletter, Investment Management Regulatory Update (May 31, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsletter, Investment Management Regulatory Update (June 28, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsflash, SEC Proposes New ETF Rule (June 29, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsletter, Investment Management Regulatory Update (July 31, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of the Compliance Inspections and Examinations, National Exam Program Risk Alert, Compliance Issues Related to Best Execution by Investment Advisers (July 11, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP, Client Newsletter, Investment Management Regulatory Update (August 30, 2018)
    Leor Landa
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, 2018 National Exam Program Examination Priorities (2018)
    Leor Landa
  • Walkers Global, Cayman Islands, Investment Funds (August 2018)
    Caroline Williams
  • Walkers Global, Cayman Islands, Regulation of Funds in the Cayman Islands (August 2018)
    Caroline Williams
  • Maples and Calder, Hedge Fund Trends 2010–2017
    Pádraig Brosnan
  • Maples and Calder, Irish Funds Trends 2013–2017
    Pádraig Brosnan
  • Complaint, Ryan Coffey v. Ripple Labs, Inc. et al., CGC-18-566271 (Cal. 2018)
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Report of Investigation Pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The DAO, Release No. 81207 (July 25, 2017)
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Staff Letter: Engaging on Fund Innovation and Cryptocurrency-Related Holdings (January 18, 2018)
    Gregory S. Rowland
  • Memorandum & Order, In re: CFTC v. McDonnell and Cabbagetech, Corp. d/b/a Coin Drop Markets, 18-CV-361 (E.D.N.Y. 2018)
    Gregory S. Rowland
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Divisions of Enforcement and Trading and Markets, Public Statement on Potentially Unlawful Online Platforms for Trading Digital Assets (March 7, 2018)
    Gregory S. Rowland
  • NFA Rulebook, 9073—Disclosure Requirements for NFA Members Engaging in Virtual Currency Activities (May 17, 2018)
    Gregory S. Rowland
  • William Hinman, Director, Division of Corporation Finance, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Speech, Remarks at the Yahoo Finance All Markets Summit: Crypto, Digital Asset Transactions: When Howey Met Gary (Plastic) (June 14, 2018)
    Gregory S. Rowland
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats BZX Exchange, Inc.; Order Setting Aside Action by Delegated Authority and Disapproving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendments No. 1 and 2, to List and Trade Shares of the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust, Release No. 34-83723, File No. SR-BatsBZX-2016-30 (July 26, 2018)
  • Commissioner Hester M. Pierce, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Public Statement on Dissent of Commissioner Hester M. Pierce to Release No. 34-83723; File No. SR-BatsBZX-2016-30 (July 26, 2018)
    Gregory S. Rowland
  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Dorozhko, Docket No. 08-0201-cv (2d Cir. 2008)
  • Indictment, In re: United States v. Korchevsky, et. al., CR 15-381 (E.D.N.Y 2015)
  • Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction, In re: HIQ Labs, Inc. v. LinkedIn Corporation, Case No. 17-cv-03301-EMC, Docket No. 23 (N.D. Cal. 2017)
  • Memorandum Opinion, In re: Sandvig v. Sessions III, Civil Action No. 16-1368 (JDB) (D.D.C. 2018)
  • Melissa Maalouf, Mason Weisz, Jon Frankel, Ken Dreifach, Kandi Parsons, Anna Hsia, Alexei Klestoff, Marci Rozen, Allison Bender, Michelle Anderson and Austin Mooney, Zwillgen PLLC, One Month Till GDPR! Seven Insights and Predictions, ZwillGen blog (April 25, 2018)
    Jon Frankel
  • California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, Assembly Bill No. 375, Chapter 55 (June 28, 2018)
  • Official Journal of the European Union, Select GDPR Articles (April 5, 2016)

Presentation Material

  • Hedge Fund Management 2018 (Introduction)
    Leor Landa
  • Hedge Fund Registration and Compliance
    Mark Polemeni, David L. Zimmerman
  • Hedge Fund Structures
    Olga Gutman, Caroline Williams
  • Digital Currency Funds: Regulatory and Other Considerations
    Sarah R. Davidoff, Gregory S. Rowland, Andrew N. Siegel
  • Data Security and Privacy: Practical Issues Affecting Hedge Funds
    Jon Frankel, Erin C. Ross, Alex Scheinman, Matthew Shoenthal
Chairperson(s)
Leor Landa ~ Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Speaker(s)
Ian Conlon ~ Maples and Calder
Sarah R. Davidoff ~ Ropes & Gray LLP
Jon Frankel ~ ZwillGen PLLC
Olga Gutman ~ Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Anthony S. Kelly ~ Dechert LLP
Mark Polemeni ~ Chief Compliance Officer & Chief Regulatory Counsel, Perella Weinberg Partners
Erin Ross ~ General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, Hitchwood Capital Management LP
Gregory S. Rowland ~ Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Alex Scheinman ~ Director, ACA Aponix
Matthew Shoenthal ~ General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, M Science LLC
Andrew N. Siegel ~ General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, Galaxy Digital LP
Ryan VanGrack ~ Citadel LLC
Caroline Williams ~ Walkers Global
David L. Zimmerman ~ General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, Graticule Asset Management Asia
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

Hedge Fund Management 2019 (New York, NY) Sep. 10, 2019

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Hedge Fund Management 2019  
Hedge Fund Management 2018 Leor Landa, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2019 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2019 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.