On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Environmental Regulation 2018: Hot Topics, Regulatory Developments, and Practical Guidance for Corporate Compliance

Released on: Jun. 15, 2018
Running Time: 06:43:26
This program will review recent developments in environmental regulation – and de-regulation – affecting compliance obligations for a range of businesses and organizations. Among other topics, our program will cover the impact of recent court decisions, new regulations, and enforcement initiatives on regulated entities, with an emphasis on providing practical suggestions for management of environmental risks and compliance obligations.

This program will take a comprehensive look at how new developments affect deal negotiations, daily operations and corporate compliance efforts. Join us and our expert faculty for an insightful look into the current, evolving regulatory landscape and for many helpful takeaways to support your practice.

Attorneys and compliance professionals invested in operations affected by environmental law and regulation will benefit from this program.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:43:26]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Introductory Remarks* [00:10:14]
    Philip E. Karmel, Duke K. McCall, III
  • Chemical Regulation: Defining the Issues [01:00:00]
    Lynn L. Bergeson, Eve C. Gartner
  • In-house Counsel Perspectives: Managing Environment Risk and Outside Counsel [01:01:02]
    Carolyn W. Jaffe, Michael G. Mahoney, Karyllan Dodson Mack
  • Environmental Practice in the New Administration: CERCLA, NEPA, OSHA [01:31:22]
    Philip E. Karmel, Duke K. McCall, III, Ronald W. Taylor
  • Environmental Practice in the New Administration: Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act [01:03:48]
    Kathy Robb, Thor W. Ketzback
  • Deal Provisions and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Issues and Trends [00:55:07]
    Maureen M. Crough, Betty Moy Huber
  • Legal Ethics for Environmental Lawyers [01:01:53]
    David G. Bowman

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Chemical Management: Defining the Issues
    Lynn L. Bergeson
  • California and New York Require Manufacturers to Disclose Ingredients in Cleaning Products
    Lynn L. Bergeson
  • Lynn L. Bergeson and Bethami Auerbach, Innovation, Consumer Products, and Legal Risk: Points to Consider
    Lynn L. Bergeson
  • In-House Counsel Perspectives on Managing Environmental Risks and Outside Counsel
    Michael G. Mahoney, Carolyn W. Jaffe, Karyllan Dodson Mack
  • U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section, Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs
    Michael G. Mahoney, Carolyn W. Jaffe, Karyllan Dodson Mack
  • U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Associate Attorney General, Memorandum on Limiting Use of Agency Guidance Documents in Affirmative Civil Enforcement Cases (January 25, 2018)
    Michael G. Mahoney, Carolyn W. Jaffe, Karyllan Dodson Mack
  • Environmental Review and Permitting Issues for Major Infrastructure Projects: New “Reforms” to Streamline Compliance (April 13, 2018)
    Philip E. Karmel
  • The White House, Legislative Outline for Rebuilding Infrastructure in America
    Philip E. Karmel
  • Memorandum of Understanding Implementing One Federal Decision under Executive Order 13807
    Philip E. Karmel
  • Morgan Lewis, LawFlash, Duke K. McCall, III, and Conrad W. Bolston, EPA Task Force Issues Recommendations to Reform Superfund Program (August 8, 2017)
    Duke K. McCall
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund Task Force Recommendations
    Duke K. McCall
  • Ronald W. Taylor and Karel Mazanec, What You Need to Know About Occupational Safety and Health
    Ronald W. Taylor
  • Clean Air Act Presentation Outline
    Thor W. Ketzback
  • Federal Environmental Liability Considerations for Lenders in Connection with Real Estate (March 19, 2018)
    Maureen M. Crough
  • ESG Reports and Ratings: What They Are, Why They Matter? (March 2018)
    Betty Moy Huber
  • Kathryn T. McGuigan and Justin Hanassab, “Me-Too” Evidence in the Era of the #MeToo Movement
    David G. Bowman
  • Mary Gail Gearns, Michael D. Blanchard and Laura Hughes McNally, Morgan Lewis LawFlash, Shareholder Litigation in the Wake of the #MeToo Movement (April 12, 2018)
    David G. Bowman
  • Grace E. Speights, Morgan Lewis Feature, How to Navigate a Workplace Harassment Crisis (February 8, 2018)
    David G. Bowman

Presentation Material

  • Chemical Regulation: Defining the Issues Panel PowerPoint
    Lynn L. Bergeson, Eve C. Gartner
  • Environmental Practice in the New Administration: CERCLA, NEPA, OSHA Panel PowerPoint 1
    Ronald W. Taylor
  • Environmental Practice in the New Administration: CERCLA, NEPA, OSHA Panel PowerPoint 2
    Duke K. McCall, III
  • Environmental Practice in the New Administration: Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act Panel PowerPoint 1
    Thor W. Ketzback
  • Environmental Practice in the New Administration: Clean Water Act, Clean Air Act Panel PowerPoint 2
    Kathy Robb
  • EPA and the Corps’ Definition of “Waters of the United States” Under the Clean Water Act Through the May 27, 2015 Final Rule
    Kathy Robb
  • Murky Waters — Are Indirect Discharges to Groundwater Regulated Under the CWA?
    Kathy Robb
  • Deal Provisions and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Issues and Trends Panel PowerPoint 1
    Maureen M. Crough
  • Deal Provisions and Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure Issues and Trends Panel PowerPoint 2
    Betty Moy Huber
Co-Chair(s)
Philip E. Karmel ~ Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP
Duke K. McCall, III ~ Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Speaker(s)
Lynn L. Bergeson ~ Bergeson & Campbell, P.C.
David G. Bowman ~ Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Maureen M. Crough ~ Sidley Austin LLP
Karyllan Dodson Mack ~ Senior Counsel, BASF Corporation
Eve C. Gartner ~ Staff Attorney, Earthjustice Northeast Office
Betty Moy Huber ~ Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Carolyn W. Jaffe ~ Associate General Counsel, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Thor W. Ketzback ~ Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP
Michael G. Mahoney ~ Vice President and Assistant General Counsel, Chief Environmental Counsel, Pfizer
Kathy Robb ~ Sive, Paget & Riesel, P.C.
Ronald W. Taylor ~ Venable LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.