transcript   Transcript

SAS and Oil States -- How Much Has the PTAB Game Changed?

Recorded on: May. 9, 2018
Running Time: 01:03:30

Full Transcript:



If you are a Privileged Member, just log in and start reading now! If you are not a Privileged Member, please click here to learn how unlimited access to PLI programs may be right for you and your firm.

To access the streaming media of this presentation, please purchase the corresponding seminar segment.

Taken from the Audio-only Briefing Recorded May 2, 2018 in New York
SAS and Oil States -- How Much Has the PTAB Game Changed? [01:03:30]

The U.S. Supreme Court has spoken, the PTAB lives!  Are you ready for the uncertainties injected into PTAB proceedings by the Court’s Oil States and SAS Institute opinions?  What other constitutional hurdles may lie in wait for the PTAB after Oil States?  Practitioners and stakeholders alike will need to navigate the aftermath of SAS Institute now. Important questions abound:

What happens in ongoing PTAB trials of partially instituted cases?
Will more briefing be permitted by the PTAB in ongoing cases? Will there be additional discovery, hearings?
How will petition practice change after SAS Institute?
What does SAS Institute mean for different petition grounds?
What does the SAS Institute change in institution decision practices mean for patent monetization strategy?
Our distinguished panel will provide an overview of the opinions and then tackle these complex practice issues and more.  Please join Scott A. McKeown of Ropes & Gray LLP; Robert Greene Sterne of Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox, P.L.L.C.; and Eugene M. Paige of Keker, Van Nest & Peters LLP for the upcoming One-Hour Briefing. And don’t miss PLI’s full day program USPTO Post-Grant Patent Trials 2018: Change & Recalibration.  Register now!

Presentation Material
  • SAS and Oil States: How Much Has the PTAB Game Changed?
    Scott A. McKeown, Eugene M. Paige, Robert Greene Sterne
  • Sterne Kessler Client Alert: Supreme Court Strikes Down PTAB Partial Institution Practice: If PTAB Institutes Inter Partes Review, It Must Address All Challenged Claims in Any Final Decision
    Scott A. McKeown, Eugene M. Paige, Robert Greene Sterne
  • Sterne Kessler Client Alert: Supreme Court Upholds Inter Partes Review as a Valid Procedure for Challenging Patent Validity: Majority Reasons that Patents are Revocable “Public Franchises”
    Scott A. McKeown, Eugene M. Paige, Robert Greene Sterne
  • Supreme Court of U.S. Court of Appeals: Case No. 16–712
    Scott A. McKeown, Eugene M. Paige, Robert Greene Sterne
  • Supreme Court of U.S. Court of Appeals: Case No. No. 16–969
    Scott A. McKeown, Eugene M. Paige, Robert Greene Sterne
  • Share
    Email
    Transcript FAQ's
    • How Can I Access Transcripts?
      You must be a Member in good standing.

    • Can I access the Video?
      Yes, you can access the video if you have the Adobe Flash plugin installed. Click on the video camera icon when you mouse over each paragraph. The media will begin playback at that point.

    • Can I get CLE credit for reading the transcript?
      No, CLE credit cannot be earned for reading a transcript. CLE credit is issued only for verified attendance while watching a web program. If seeking credit, please verify the program's eligibility for credit and expiration date in your jurisdiction on the web segment launch page before commencing the program.
    
    • FOLLOW PLI:
    • twitter
    • LinkedIn
    • YouTube
    • RSS

    All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

    © 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.