transcript   Transcript

Whether Habeas or Other Federal Court Actions Might Be Viable Options

Recorded on: Jul. 10, 2017
Running Time: 01:00:05

Full Transcript:



If you are a Privileged Member, just log in and start reading now! If you are not a Privileged Member, please click here to learn how unlimited access to PLI programs may be right for you and your firm.

To access the streaming media of this presentation, please purchase the corresponding seminar segment.

Taken from the Web Program Emergency Legal Challenges to Imminent Removals: Emergency Petitions for Review of Administrative and Reinstatement Orders, Emergency Motions to Reopen, and Whether Habeas Might Be a Viable Option recorded July, 2017 in San Francisco.

Whether Habeas or Other Federal Court Actions Might Be Viable Options [01:00:05]

This panel will cover habeas and other federal court filings that may be useful on an emergency basis.  Topics will include: federal court jurisdiction and the significant bars to jurisdiction, likely next steps regarding the threatened expansion of expedited removal, and possible actions to challenge detention transfers and interference with access to counsel.  [Please note that this panel will not cover habeas corpus petitions for release from immigration detention.]

Julia Harumi Mass, Zachary M. Nightingale

Presentation Material

  • Practice Advisory - Expedited Removal: What Has Changed Since Executive Order No. 13767, Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements (Issued on January 25, 2017), February 20, 2017
    Monica Oca Howell, Katherine M. Lewis, Julia Harumi Mass, Zachary M. Nightingale, Ilyce Shugall, Valerie A. Zukin
  • Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, Kar v. Bush, 1:05-cv-01348-JR (D.DC.)
    Monica Oca Howell, Katherine M. Lewis, Julia Harumi Mass, Zachary M. Nightingale, Ilyce Shugall, Valerie A. Zukin
  • Petitioner’s Amended Application for Temporary Restraining Order; Points & Authorities in Support, Vayeghan v. Kelly, Case No. 2:17-cv-00702-SJO-GJS (C.D. Cal.)
    Monica Oca Howell, Katherine M. Lewis, Julia Harumi Mass, Zachary M. Nightingale, Ilyce Shugall, Valerie A. Zukin
  • Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief, Vayeghan v. Kelly, Case No. 2:17-cv-00702 (C.D. Cal.)
    Monica Oca Howell, Katherine M. Lewis, Julia Harumi Mass, Zachary M. Nightingale, Ilyce Shugall, Valerie A. Zukin
(s)
Julia H Mass ~ Senior Staff Attorney, ACLU of Northern California
Zachary M Nightingale ~ Partner, Van Der Hout, Brigagliano & Nightingale
Share
Email
Transcript FAQ's
  • How Can I Access Transcripts?
    You must be a Member in good standing.

  • Can I access the Video?
    Yes, you can access the video if you have the Adobe Flash plugin installed. Click on the video camera icon when you mouse over each paragraph. The media will begin playback at that point.

  • Can I get CLE credit for reading the transcript?
    No, CLE credit cannot be earned for reading a transcript. CLE credit is issued only for verified attendance while watching a web program. If seeking credit, please verify the program's eligibility for credit and expiration date in your jurisdiction on the web segment launch page before commencing the program.

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • GooglePlus
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2017 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2017 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.