On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Sixteenth Annual Institute on Securities Regulation in Europe: Practical Implications of U.S. Law on EU Practice

Released on: Jan. 27, 2017
Running Time: 11:57:41

We are proud to present Practising Law Institute’s Sixteenth Annual Institute on Securities Regulation in Europe, the most comprehensive securities programme available in Europe, with a unique focus on the application of U.S. securities law in the EU. This Institute will provide the important U.S. perspective relevant to UK and European practice, featuring leading practitioners active in the U.S. and Europe, as well as company management, investment bankers and in-house counsel. We also will have a number of government regulators from the U.S. and the UK presenting on the latest developments and participating in the panels. 

This year’s programme will focus on the challenges of post-crisis regulation, Brexit and the EU Market Abuse Regulation. The panels will consider the implications of these developments on market activity and practice for companies and financial institutions across Europe, the U.S. and further afield.  We will also take an in-depth look at the current state of the U.S. and European equity capital markets and regulatory developments affecting those markets, and provide a practical update on recent accounting and auditing developments. This year’s programme will take a deep dive into enforcement efforts both in the U.S. and across Europe, with a panel on enforcement priorities and the approaches of the relevant regulatory agencies, as well as a panel focused on securities litigation developments important to transactional lawyers and corporate counsel. The leveraged finance market remains central to much of the cross-border deal execution in Europe, and a panel of legal practitioners and bankers will cover the latest developments in this area. The programme will also include a detailed discussion of the challenges in structuring cross border M&A transactions in light of uncertainties resulting from Brexit. This unique programme will leave you with the latest information and best practices to serve your clients.

The programme will include sessions on the following topics:

  • The current regulatory environment, including new U.S. rulemaking and its implications for market developments and practice 
  • Market trends in cross-border capital markets and practical pointers
  • The impact of Brexit on structuring cross-border M&A transactions and its interaction with the continuing challenges of post-crisis regulation
  • The latest accounting and auditing developments 
  • Enforcement priorities and programs: what you and your clients or companies need to know
  • Securities litigation developments: what matters for transactional lawyers and corporate counsel 
  • Leveraged finance: market update and latest innovations
  • What every cross-border lawyer needs to know about ethics

Special Features:

This important event will feature: 

  • Keynote speakers to kick off the programme each day 
  • Important U.S. regulator and practitioner perspectives
  • CPD, CLE and CPE credits


The Sixteenth Annual Institute on Securities Regulation in Europe will be the most important and comprehensive securities conference that you can view in 2017. This conference is crucial for corporate and securities lawyers in private practice and in-house, CEOs, CFOs, CIOs and others in senior management whose decisions are affected by securities laws and by cross-border mergers & acquisitions.

Lecture Topics [Total time 11:57:41]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.


  • Welcome, Opening Remarks and Introduction* [00:04:36]
    Bradley J. Gans, Nilufer von Bismarck, John W. Banes
  • Keynote Address* [00:29:10]
    Mark Steward
  • Regulatory Developments Affecting the Capital Markets in the US [01:11:55]
    Sebastian R. Sperber, Nicholas Baumgartner, Peter Castellon, Erik Morris, Deborah A. Smith
  • Regulatory Developments Affecting the Capital Markets in Europe [00:55:56]
    Diana Billik, Jon Grussing, Laura A. Holleman, Delphine Mourot, Mark S. Bergman
  • Executing Capital Markets Deals Across the US and Europe – Practical Pointers and Market Trends [01:07:04]
    Sarah Murphy, Cecil D. Quillen III, Mandy DeFilippo, Natalia Nicolaidis, James C. Scoville
  • The Challenges of Post-Crisis Regulation and Brexit [01:00:19]
    Simon Dodds, Bob Hoyt, Andrew J. Bagley, Kate Cheetham, Sajid F. Hussein, John Tribolati
  • Accounting and Auditing Developments for 2017: What Lawyers Need to Know! [01:57:13]
    John W. White, Wesley R. Bricker, Michael J. Gallagher, Mary B. Tokar
  • Enforcement Programmes and Priorities in the U.S. and UK [00:59:59]
    Robert S. Khuzami, Joe P. Longo, Stephanie Pagni, Mark Steward, David Green
  • Developments in Securities Litigation for Corporate Lawyers [00:59:29]
    Damien Byrne Hill, James H.R. Windels, Deborah Finkler, Bradley J. Gans
  • Leveraged Finance: Market Update and Key Trends [00:56:58]
    Nicholas J. Shaw, Matthias Baudisch, Yasmine Bassili, Mark Danzey, Scott Colwell
  • Challenges in Structuring Cross Border M&A Transactions in Light of Uncertainties Resulting from Brexit [01:14:19]
    Richard A. Pollack, Pranav L. Trivedi, Matthew Blows, Ton Schutte
  • Ethical Issues for the Transaction Lawyer in a Global Practice [01:00:43]
    Robert H. Mundheim, Robert Evans III, Hans-Michael Giesen, Stephen Woodward

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:


  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Comment Letter of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton RE: PCAOB Release No. 2016-003; Rulemaking Docket Matter No. 034; Proposed Auditing Standard—The Auditors Report on an Audit of Financial Statements when the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion and the Related Auditor’s Report; and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards (August 15, 2016)
    Sebastian R. Sperber
  • FAST Act Amendments to the U.S. Securities Laws (December 16, 2015)
    Sebastian R. Sperber
  • SEC Proposes to Overhaul Its Disclosure Requirements for Mining Companies (June 20, 2016)
    Sebastian R. Sperber
  • Non-GAAP Financial Measures: The SEC’s Evolving Views (June 13, 2016)
    Sebastian R. Sperber
  • SEC Releases New Guidance on Non-GAAP Financial Measures (May 18, 2016)
    Sebastian R. Sperber
  • The SEC’s New Proposal on Resource Extraction Payments: A Deeper Dive (January 22, 2016)
    Sebastian R. Sperber
  • SIFMA Reg S-K Comment Letter to SEC Re: Business and Financial Disclosure Required by Regulation S-K (File Number S7-06-16) (July 21, 2016)
    Sebastian R. Sperber
  • SIFMA Reg S-X Comment Letter to SEC Re: Request for Comment on the Effectiveness of Financial Disclosures About Entities Other Than the Registrant (November 30, 2015)
    Sebastian R. Sperber
  • The New EU Market Abuse Regulation: An Overview for UK Issuers (January 2016)
    Nilufer von Bismarck
  • The New Market Abuse Regime—Impact on Issuers of Debt Securities (July 2016)
    Nilufer von Bismarck
  • The Market Abuse Regulation: Key Implications for Issues of Debt Securities (November 2016)
    Diana Billik
  • SEC Proposes Overhaul of Mining Disclosures (June 30, 2016)
    Matthew E. Kaplan, James C. Scoville, Natalia A. Drebezgina, Vera Losonci, Paul M. Rodel, Alan V. Kartashkin
  • SEC Adopts New Disclosure Requirements for Resource Extraction Issuers (July 18, 2016)
    Matthew E. Kaplan, Bruce E. Yannett, James C. Scoville, Paul M. Rodel, Alexander V. Ulianov, Alan V. Kartashkin, Andrew M. Levine
  • Alternative Performance Measures (APMs) (July 2016)
    Sarah Murphy
  • SEC Staff Issues New and Revised Guidance on Non-GAAP Financial Measures (May 2016)
    Sarah Murphy, Valerie Jacob, Michael Levitt, Paul Tropp
  • SEC Raises Exchange Act Registration, Termination and Suspension Thresholds to Conform with JOBS Act and FAST Act (May 2016)
    Cecil D. Quillen
  • Brexit Briefing: Possible Implications for London Listed Companies
    Sarah Murphy
  • Brexit: Potential Implications for Mainstream Debt Capital Markets (June 2016)
    Cecil D. Quillen
  • Brexit: Potential Implications for Structured Finance (June 2016)
    Cecil D. Quillen
  • UK/EU: The UK has Voted to Leave the EU—Impact on the Use of English Governing Law and Jurisdiction Clauses in Cross-Border Commercial Contracts (June 2016)
    Cecil D. Quillen
  • The Market Abuse Regulation: Practical Tips for Compliance with the New Regime (August 3, 2016)
    James C. Scoville, Natalia A. Drebezgina, Alan V. Kartashkin, Vera Losonci, Dominic Blaxill, Thomas Matthews, Maxim A. Kuleshov
  • MAR: Disclosure of Inside Information (June 2016)
    Sarah Murphy
  • MAR: Insider Lists (June 2016)
    Sarah Murphy
  • MAR: Dealings by PDMRs (June 2016)
    Sarah Murphy
  • MAR: Market Soundings (July 2016)
    Sarah Murphy
  • The EU Market Abuse Regulation—What Does It Mean for Issuers and Advisors Outside Europe? (July 2016)
    Sarah Murphy
  • MAR: Key Points for Liability Management Practitioners (October 2016)
    Cecil D. Quillen
  • Investing in Europe: What Do U.S. Investors Need to Know About MAR? (June 2016)
    Cecil D. Quillen
  • Brexit Essentials: Dispute Resolution Clauses (November 2016)
    Nilufer von Bismarck
  • Is it Now Time to Treat the Banks More Fairly (June 2016)
    Nilufer von Bismarck
  • CO/3809/2016; CO/3281/2016: Skeleton Argument of the Secretary of State (September 30, 2016)
    Simon Dodds
  • The Process for Withdrawing from the European Union (February 2016)
    Simon Dodds
  • Acting Associate Attorney General Bill Baer Delivers Remarks at American Antitrust Institute’s 17th Annual Conference (June 16, 2016)
    Simon Dodds
  • New York State Department of Financial Services Proposed Regulations—23 NYCRR 500: Cybersecurity Requirements for Financial Services Companies
    Simon Dodds
  • Financial Conduct Authority: Discussion Paper—Overall Responsibility and the Legal Function (September 2016)
    Simon Dodds
  • Memorandum on Individual Accountability for Corporate Wrongdoing—U.S. Department of Justice—Office of the Deputy Attorney General (September 9, 2015)
    Simon Dodds
  • Remarks Before Meeting with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif; Secretary of State John Kerry—U.S. Department of State (April 22, 2016)
    Simon Dodds
  • Link to Selected Article from the Wall Street Journal: Kerry’s Peculiar Message About Iran for European Banks: Why is Washington Pushing Banks Like Mine to Do What is Still Illegal for American Banks? By Stuart Levey
    Simon Dodds
  • FASB Proposes Technical Corrections to the New Revenue Standard (May 19, 2016)
    John W. White
  • Preparing for the New Revenue Standard—Are You Ready? (December 2015)
    John W. White
  • Speech by Wesley R. Bricker, Deputy Chief Accountant: Remarks before the 35th Annual SEC and Financial Reporting Institute Conference (June 9, 2016)
    John W. White
  • Project Summary and Feedback Statement: IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (May 2014)
    John W. White
  • The Leasing Standard—A Comprehensive Look at the New Model and Its Impact (March 2, 2016)
    John W. White
  • 10 Minutes on the New US Lease Standard: How the New Rules Will Bring Changes to Your Financial Statements (August 2016)
    John W. White
  • Project Summary and Feedback Statement: IFRS 16 Leases (January 2016)
    John W. White
  • Speech by Wesley R. Bricker, Deputy Chief Accountant: Remarks before the 2016 Baruch College Financial Reporting Conference (May 5, 2016)
    John W. White
  • Project Summary: IFRS 9 Financial Instruments (July 2014)
    John W. White
  • The FASB’s New Financial Instruments Impairment Model—Accounting and Disclosure Considerations (July 11, 2016)
    John W. White
  • Financial Markets Insights: New Guidance on Recognition and Measurement of Financial Instruments (April 2016)
    John W. White
  • How Many Listed Companies Use IFRS Standards Globally?
    John W. White
  • Press Release: Trustees Conclude Review of Structure and Effectiveness of the IFRS® Foundation; Propose Amendments to Constitution (June 10, 2016)
    John W. White
  • Speech by Chair Mary Jo White: Securities Regulation in the Interconnected, Global Marketplace (September 21, 2016)
    John W. White
  • Blackline of Updated Non-GAAP C&DIs (May 17, 2016)
    John W. White
  • IOSCO Statement on Non-GAAP Financial Matters: Final Report (June 7, 2016)
    John W. White
  • SEC Updates Interpretive Guidance on Non-GAAP Financial Measures (May 19, 2016)
    John W. White
  • To GAAP or Non-GAAP? The SEC is Watching (June 2016)
    John W. White
  • Building Confidence in Non-GAAP Measures and Other KPIs—A Path Forward (May 2016)
    John W. White
  • Questions on Non-GAAP Measures—A Tool for Audit Committees
    John W. White
  • Speech by James V. Schnurr, Chief Accountant: Remarks before the 12th Annual Life Sciences Accounting and Reporting Congress (March 22, 2016)
    John W. White
  • Speech by Chair Mary Jo White: International Corporate Governance Network Annual Conference: Focusing the Lens of Disclosure to Set the Path Forward on Board Diversity, Non-GAAP, and Sustainability (June 27, 2016)
    John W. White
  • SEC Proposes Amendments to Update and Simplify Disclosure Requirements (July 15, 2016)
    John W. White
  • SEC 17 CFR Part 229—Request for Comment on Subpart 400 of Regulation S-K Disclosure Requirements Relating to Management, Certain Security Holders and Corporate Governance Matters
    John W. White
  • SEC Seeks Comments on the Disclosure Requirements of Regulation S-K (April 14, 2016)
    John W. White
  • SEC Seeks Comments on First Initiative of Disclosure Effectiveness Project (October 5, 2015)
    John W. White
  • Financial Accounting Standards Board: Technical Agenda Overview (October 27, 2016)
    John W. White
  • Financial Accounting Standards Board: Disclosure Framework—Board’s Decision Process
    John W. White
  • IASB® Speech by Hans Hoogervorst: “Better Communication” (June 30, 2016)
    John W. White
  • IASB® Speech by Hans Hoogervorst: “Mind the Gap (Between Non-GAAP and GAAP)” (March 31, 2015)
    John W. White
  • IASB® Speech by Hans Hoogervorst: “Latest Developments and Future Focus” (August 24, 2016)
    John W. White
  • PCAOB Release No. 2015-003—Audit Committee Dialogue (May 7, 2015)
    John W. White
  • PCAOB Staff Inspection Brief—Information about 2016 Inspections (July 2016)
    John W. White
  • Speech by Brian T. Croteau, Deputy Chief Accountant: Remarks before the 2015 AICPA National Conference on Current SEC and PCAOB Developments (December 9, 2015)
    John W. White
  • PCAOB: Update on Trends and Issues in Audits of Internal Control over Financial Reporting (August 6, 2016)
    Jeanette M. Franzel, John W. White
  • Audit Quality Indicators: The Journey and Path Ahead (January 2016)
    John W. White
  • PCAOB: Standard-Setting Agenda—Office of the Chief Auditor (September 30, 2016)
    John W. White
  • Speech by Chair Mary Jo White: Keynote Address at the 2015 AICPA National Conference: “Maintaining High-Quality, Reliable Financial Reporting: A Shared and Weighty Responsibility” (December 9, 2015)
    John W. White
  • Speech by Andrew Ceresney, Director, Division of Enforcement: The SEC Enforcement Division’s Focus on Auditors and Auditing (September 22, 2016)
    John W. White
  • The Evolving Role of Audit Committees Challenges and the Way Forward (March 18, 2016)
    John W. White
  • CAQ Insights: The Audit Committee of the Future (June 2016)
    John W. White
  • SEC Considers Changes to Audit Committee Disclosure of Auditor Oversight (July 7, 2015)
    John W. White
  • Speech by Chair Mary Jo White: The Challenge of Coverage, Accountability and Deterrence in Global Enforcement (October 1, 2014)
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • Speech by Matthew Wagstaff: The Role and Remit of the SFO (May 18, 2016)
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • Assistant Attorney General Leslie R. Caldwell Delivers Remarks at New York University Law School’s Program on Corporate Compliance and Enforcement (April 17, 2015)
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • Serious Fraud Office: Corporate Self-Reporting (October 2012)
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • Criminal Division Launches New FCPA Pilot Program (April 5, 2016)
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • Serious Fraud Office: Deferred Prosecution Agreements (DPA): A Practical Guide by Defense and Prosecution (October 17, 2016)
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • Serious Fraud Office: Deferred Prosecution Agreements
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • U.S. Department of Justice: The Fraud Section’s Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement Plan and Guidance (April 5, 2016)
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • Serious Fraud Office: SFO Secures Second DPA (July 8, 2016)
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • Cross-Border Overview: Managing Differences in DOJ and SFO Approaches to Corporate Cooperation in Cross-Border Investigations—An Extract from The Investigations Review of the Americas 2017
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • Deputy Attorney General Sally Quillian Yates Delivers Remarks at New York University School of Law—Announcing New Policy on Individual Liability in Matters of Corporate Wrongdoing (September 10, 2015)
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • U.S. Department of Justice: Yates Memo on Individual Accountability for Corporate Wrongdoing (September 9, 2015)
    Robert S. Khuzami
  • Extract from The Securities Litigation Review—Chapter 6: England and Wales
    Damien Byrne Hill, Harry Edwards, Karen Anderson
  • Developments in Securities Litigation for Corporate Lawyers (PowerPoint slides)
    James H.R. Windels
  • The Continuing Evolution of European Leveraged Loans
    Nilufer von Bismarck
  • Salman v. United States: Supreme Court Considers the Scope of Tipper/Tippee Liability Under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (October 12, 2016)
    Nicholas J. Shaw
  • SEC Issues Guidance on Non-GAAP Financial Measures (May 23, 2016)
    Nicholas J. Shaw
  • IOSCO Issues Report on Non-GAAP Financial Measures (August 18, 2016)
    Nicholas J. Shaw
  • Brexit Essentials: The Legal and Business Implications of the UK Leaving the EU (March 2016)
    Nilufer von Bismarck
  • “Brexit”—Vote by the UK to Leave the EU (June 24, 2016)
    Richard A. Pollack
  • Assessing the Impact of Brexit on UK and European M&A (PowerPoint slides)
    Scott V. Simpson
  • Brexit: High Court Rules that the UK Government Cannot Notify the UK’s Withdrawal From the EU Without the Prior Approval of Parliament
    Richard A. Pollack, Scott V. Simpson
  • German Lawyers’ Professional Regulations (October 21, 2016)
    Hans-Michael Giesen
  • Recent U.S. Developments: Rule 8.4
    Robert H. Mundheim
  • Hypothetical I—Secondments
    Robert H. Mundheim
  • Supporting Materials for Hypothetical I—Secondments
    Robert H. Mundheim
  • Hypothetical II—Up the Ladder Reporting
    Robert H. Mundheim
  • Supporting Materials for Hypothetical II—Up the Ladder Reporting
    Robert H. Mundheim
  • Hypothetical III—Underwriting Syndicate Counsel
    Robert H. Mundheim
  • Supporting Materials for Hypothetical III—Underwriting Syndicate Counsel
    Robert H. Mundheim

Presentation Material


  • Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    Nicholas Baumgartner, Peter Castellon, Erik Morris, Deborah A. Smith, Sebastian R. Sperber
  • Regulatory Developments Affecting the Capital Markets in the U.S.
    Nicholas Baumgartner, Peter Castellon, Erik Morris, Deborah A. Smith, Sebastian R. Sperber
  • Volcker Rule Implications for EU Capital Markets Deals
    Nicholas Baumgartner, Peter Castellon, Erik Morris, Deborah A. Smith, Sebastian R. Sperber
  • Regulatory Developments Affecting the Capital Markets in Europe
    Mark S. Bergman, Diana Billik, Jon Grussing, Laura A. Holleman, Delphine Mourot
  • Executing Capital Markets Deals across the US and Europe – Practical Pointers and Market Trends
    Mandy DeFilippo, Sarah Murphy, Natalia Nicolaidis, Cecil D. Quillen III, James C. Scoville
  • Accounting and Auditing Developments for 2017
    Wesley R. Bricker, Michael J. Gallagher, Mary B. Tokar, John W. White
  • Developments in Securities Litigation for Corporate Lawyers
    James H.R. Windels
Co-Chair(s)
John W. Banes ~ Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Bradley J. Gans ~ Chief Legal Officer, EMEA, Citi
Nilufer von Bismarck ~ Slaughter and May
Moderator(s)
Diana Billik ~ Allen & Overy LLP
Damien Byrne Hill ~ Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
Simon Dodds ~ Co-General Counsel, Deutsche Bank
Bob Hoyt ~ Group General Counsel, Barclays Bank PLC
Robert S Khuzami ~ Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Sarah Murphy ~ Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
Richard A. Pollack ~ Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Cecil D. Quillen III ~ Linklaters LLP
Sebastian R. Sperber ~ Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Pranav L. Trivedi ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom (UK) LLP
John W. White ~ Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Speaker(s)
Andrew J. Bagley ~ EMEA General Counsel, Goldman Sachs International
Yasmine Bassili ~ Managing Director, Goldman Sachs International
Matthias Baudisch ~ Allen & Overy LLP
Nicholas Baumgartner ~ Director and Deputy General Counsel, Equity Capital Markets, Citigroup Global Markets Limited
Mark S. Bergman ~ Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Matthew Blows ~ Macfarlanes LLP
Wesley R. Bricker ~ Chief Accountant, Office of the Chief Accountant, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Peter Castellon ~ Proskauer Rose LLP
Kate Cheetham ~ Group General Counsel, Lloyds Banking Group
Scott Colwell ~ Latham & Watkins LLP
Mark Danzey ~ Director, KKR Capital Markets
Mandy DeFilippo ~ Head of BU Risk Management, Fixed Income Division (EMEA), Morgan Stanley
Robert Evans III ~ Deputy Director, Legal and Regulatory Policy, Division of Corporation Finance, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Deborah Finkler ~ Slaughter & May
Michael J. Gallagher ~ Managing Partner, Assurance Quality, PwC
Hans-Michael Giesen ~ Giesen Heidbrink
David Green ~ Director, U.K. Serious Fraud Office
Jon Grussing ~ Managing Director, Head of Equity Corporate Finance, Credit Suisse
Laura A. Holleman ~ Managing Director, General Counsel Investment Banking Division, Goldman Sachs International
Sajid F. Hussein ~ General Counsel, EMEA, Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Joe P. Longo ~ General Counsel, UK, Deutsche Bank AG
Erik Morris ~ Co-Head EMEA Investment Banking and Capital Markets - Legal, Credit Suisse
Delphine Mourot ~ Executive Director - Global Capital Markets, Morgan Stanley
Robert H. Mundheim ~ Shearman & Sterling LLP
Natalia Nicolaidis ~ General Counsel, Investment Banking and Capital Markets, Credit Suisse
Stephanie Pagni ~ General Counsel, Barclays UK
Ton Schutte ~ De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek
James C. Scoville ~ Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Nicholas J. Shaw ~ Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Deborah A. Smith ~ Executive Director and Senior Counsel, Goldman Sachs International
Mark Steward ~ Director of Enforcement and Market Oversight, Financial Conduct Authority
Mary B. Tokar ~ Member, International Accounting Standards Board
John Tribolati ~ Managing Director & EMEA General Counsel, JP Morgan Chase
James H.R. Windels ~ Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
Stephen Woodward ~ Managing Director, EMEA Head of Litigation & Regulatory Investigations, Citi
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-traditional” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of non-traditional programs per reporting period.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 3 on-demand credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “A/V” credit. Attorneys are limited to 22.5 credits of A/V programs per reporting period.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as “QAS Self-Study” credit. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

 

Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • GooglePlus
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2017 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2017 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.