On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Reentry in California – Overcoming Legal Barriers to Community Reintegration 2018 (Free)

Released on: Aug. 17, 2018
Running Time: 05:12:30

Please note that this program does not offer Bias or Diversity & Inclusion credit in any jurisdiction.

In the past three decades, incarceration rates have exploded in the U.S., such that today we incarcerate over two million people, more than any other country in the world. The result is that many more people encounter the criminal justice system at some point in their lives. Indeed, an estimated 1 in 3 adults in California has an arrest or conviction record, and low-income people and people of color are disproportionately affected.

A person with a prior record faces significant barriers to employment, occupational licensing, and other basic necessities like housing, even when the record is old or relatively minor. Now more than ever, immigrants face the threat of deportation based on criminal justice contacts as minor as an arrest that did not result in conviction. This training is designed to give lawyers a foundation in the collateral consequences of contact with the criminal justice system, as well as tools for representing clients in need of reentry legal services.

Lecture Topics [Total time 05:12:30]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:09:50]
    Maureen Kildee, Danica Rodarmel, Theresa Zhen
  • Walking the Talk in Allyship – How to Effectively Support Criminal Justice Impacted Communities [01:00:55]
    Brandon L. Greene, Joseph Calderon, Eric Henderson
  • Criminal Record Remedy Updates and Advocacy Strategies [00:59:40]
    Maureen Kildee, Ali Saidi, Eliza Hersh, Brandon C. Banks
  • When Poverty Is a Crime and Justice Is Privatized – Bail, Court Fees, and Traffic Courts [00:57:45]
    Danica Rodarmel, Theresa Zhen, Noe Gudiño, Brandon C. Banks
  • Overcoming Criminal Record – Related Barriers to Employment and Occupational Licensing [01:04:10]
    Sadie Wathen, Sandra Johnson, Adam G. Slote, Christian Schreiber
  • Using Technology to Provide Better Clean Slate Services to More Clients [01:00:10]
    Eva J. DeLair, Danica Rodarmel, Katrina Logan, Sacha C. Steinberger, Tucker Cottingham

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  •  Seen and Unseen: A Black Attorney’s Experience and a Cousin’s Humanity, Silicon Valley De-Bug, April 4, 2017
    Brandon L. Greene
  • Be Accomplices, Not Allies, CODEPINK, February 22, 2017
    Brandon L. Greene
  • Who Pays? The True Cost of Incarceration on Families (September 2015)
    Brandon L. Greene
  • William P. Quigley, Revolutionary Lawyering: Addressing the Root Causes of Poverty and Wealth, 20 Wash. U. J. L. & Pol’y 101 (2006), http://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_journal_law_policy/vol20/iss1/6
    Brandon L. Greene
  • William P. Quigley, Reflections of Community Organizers: Lawyering for Empowerment of Community Organizations, 21 Ohio N.U. L. Rev. 455 (1994)
    Brandon L. Greene
  • The New “Three-Tiered” PC 290 Registration (SB 384; Stats 2017, Ch. 541): What to Know, and What to Do, Right Now!
    Eliza Hersh
  • Sample Sex Offender Registration RAP Sheets with Annotations Regarding Issue Spotting and Termination Eligibility
    Eliza Hersh
  • California Penal Code 1203.43, Criminal Procedure: Judgment and Execution
    Ali Saidi
  • Bill Text—California Assembly Bill 2867, Criminal Procedure: Post-Conviction Relief, February 16, 2018
    Ali Saidi
  • Eligibility for Termination of §290 Registration Overview—Current Law (Until 2021) and New Law (Starting 2021)
    Eliza Hersh
  • Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants PC 1203.43 and 1473.7 (PowerPoint slides)
    Ali Saidi
  • Post-Conviction Relief in California (PowerPoint slides)
    Brandon C. Banks
  • California Sex Offense Registration 2018 (PowerPoint slides)
    Eliza Hersh
  • Criminal Justice Administrative Fees: High Pain for People, Low Gain for Government, The Financial Justice Project, Office of the Treasurer & Tax Collector, City and County of San Francisco
    Theresa Zhen
  • Judicial Council Ability to Pay Form, TR-320/CR-320
    Theresa Zhen
  • Judicial Council Ability to Pay Order, TR-321/CR-321
    Theresa Zhen
  • California Rule of Court 4.335, Ability-to-Pay Determinations for Infraction Offenses
    Theresa Zhen
  • California Rule of Court 4.105, Appearance without Deposit of Bail in Infraction Cases
    Theresa Zhen
  • California Rule of Court 4.106, Failure to Appear or Failure to Pay for a Notice to Appear Issued for an Infraction Offense
    Theresa Zhen
  • Rubicon v. Solano County—Settlement
    Theresa Zhen
  • Description of Parking Ticket Reforms in San Francisco—SF Municipal Transportation Agency
    Theresa Zhen
  • Egana v. Blair's Bail Bonds, First Amended Complaint, Case No. 2:17-cv-5899 (E.D. La. Sept. 12, 2017)
    Danica Rodarmel
  • Vasquez v. Nexus, Class Action Complaint, Case No. 3:17-cv-755 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2017)
    Danica Rodarmel
  • Silicon Valley De-Bug—Humphrey Decision Information with Sample San Francisco County Motion for Formal Bail Hearing and Order Releasing Defendant on Own Recognizance or Bail Reduction
    Danica Rodarmel
  • About the Bail Clinic, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area
    Danica Rodarmel
  • Bail Clinic Flyer, Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area
    Danica Rodarmel
  • Criminalization of Poverty (PowerPoint slides)
    Danica Rodarmel, Jessica Nowlan, Sierra Villaran, Theresa Zhen
  • Fair Change Licensing Reform: Opening Pathways for People with Records to Join Licensed Professions, October 2017, National Employment Law Project
    Sadie Wathen
  • Unlicensed & Untapped: Removing Barriers to State Occupational Licenses for People with Records, April 2016, National Employment Law Project
    Sadie Wathen
  • Know Your Rights as a Job Applicant under the 2017 California Fair Chance Act, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children
    Sandra Johnson
  • Overcoming Criminal Record-Related Barriers to Employment and Occupational Licensing (PowerPoint slides)
    Sadie Wathen, Christian Schreiber, Adam G. Slote, Sandra Johnson
  • Importance of Jobs for People as They Return Home from Prison (PowerPoint slides)
    Sandra Johnson
  • Technology Panel Guide—Tech and Referral Tools
    Danica Rodarmel, Katrina Logan, Sacha C. Steinberger, Eva J. DeLair
  • Using Tech in Clean Slate Services (PowerPoint slides)
    Katrina Logan, Danica Rodarmel, Sacha C. Steinberger, Eva J. DeLair

Presentation Material

  • Post-Conviction Relief for Immigrants PC 1203.43 and 1473.7 (PowerPoint slides)
    Ali Saidi
  • Post-Conviction Relief In California (PowerPoint slides)
    Brandon C. Banks
  • California Sex Offense Registration 2018 (PowerPoint slides)
    Eliza Hersh
  • Rose Cahn, Clean Slate for Immigrants - Reducing Felonies to Misdemeanors: Penal Code § 18.5, Prop 47, Penal Code § 17(b)(3), and Prop 64
    Ali Saidi
  • Criminalization of Poverty (PowerPoint slides)
    Brandon C. Banks, Noe Gudiño, Danica Rodarmel, Theresa Zhen
  • Overcoming Criminal Record-Related Barriers to Employment and Occupational Licensing (PowerPoint slides)
    Christian Schreiber, Adam G. Slote
  • Importance of Jobs for People as They Return Home from Prison (PowerPoint slides)
    Sandra Johnson
  • Using Tech in Clean Slate Services (PowerPoint slides)
    Tucker Cottingham, Eva J. DeLair, Katrina Logan, Sacha C. Steinberger
Co-Chair(s)
Maureen Kildee ~ Staff Attorney and Clinical Supervisor, Clean Slate Practice, East Bay Community Law Center
Danica Rodarmel ~ Equal Justice Works Fellow, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights of the San Francisco Bay Area
Theresa Zhen ~ Staff Attorney and Clinical Supervisor, Clean Slate Practice, East Bay Community Law Center
Speaker(s)
Brandon C. Banks ~ Deputy Public Defender, Contra Costa County Public Defender's Office
Joseph Calderon ~ Senior Community Health Worker, Transitions Clinic, Prisoner Reentry Network
Tucker Cottingham ~ CEO & Co-Founder, Lawyaw
Eva J. DeLair ~ Associate Director of Northern California Partnerships, Root and Rebound
Brandon L. Greene ~ Staff Attorney and Clinical Supervisor, Clean Slate Practice, East Bay Community Law Center
Noe Gudiño ~ 2018 Elder Freeman Policy Fellow, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children
Eric Henderson ~ Policy Associate, Ella Baker Center for Human Rights
Eliza Hersh ~ Attorney at Law,
Sandra Johnson ~ 2017 Elder Freeman Policy Fellow, All of Us or None Organizer, Legal Services for Prisoners with Children
Katrina Logan ~ Economic Advancement Program Director, Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto
Ali Saidi ~ Deputy Public Defender Immigration Attorney, Contra Costa County Public Defender’s Office
Christian Schreiber ~ Partner, Olivier Schreiber & Chao LLP
Adam G. Slote ~ Partner, Slote, Links & Boreman, LLP
Sacha C. Steinberger ~ Founding Attorney, Project Legal Link
Sadie Wathen ~ Attorney, Clean Slate Program, Alameda County Public Defender’s Office
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.