On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Advanced Data Privacy, Cybersecurity Breach and TCPA Class Action Litigation Strategies and Defenses 2018

Released on: Feb. 2, 2018
Running Time: 06:10:15

This advanced program will include a technology tutorial designed to identify the latest threats and challenges, an exhaustive year-in-review update on the latest cases, circuit splits and trends, extensive discussion of strategy on multiple panels featuring top lawyers and judges in the field, and very granular discussions of the latest class certification, motion practice and settlement trends, and techniques for valuing different types of cases.

This program has been carefully planned as a one day symposium – not a series of separate panels. To get the full benefit, you should attend every session in the order in which they are presented to fully benefit from this advanced seminar.  Those attending live will also have the opportunity to interact and mingle with the judges and lawyer panelists between sessions.

Join our expert faculty for advanced guidance on the latest legal trends, procedural pitfalls and opportunities in anticipating, avoiding, and ultimately successfully defending security breach, data privacy and TCPA class action litigation.


Lecture Topics [Total time 06:10:15]
Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.
  • Program Overview* [00:05:16]
    Ian C. Ballon
  • Advanced Forensics Technology Tutorial: What Lawyers Need to Understand to Litigate Data Privacy and Cybersecurity [01:02:11]
    Jonathan R. Mayer
  • A Strategic Briefing in Data Privacy, Security Breach and TCPA Class Action Case Substantive Law, Circuit Splits, Trends and Strategies to Defeat These Cases [01:02:38]
    Ian C. Ballon
  • Personal Jurisdiction, Venue, Standing Post-Spokeo and Issues of Remand/Removal: New Case Law and Trends in Privacy, Security Breach and TCPA Litigation [00:58:15]
    Hon. Laurel Beeler, Timothy G. Blood, Bryan H. Heckenlively
  • Class Certification in Data Privacy, Cybersecurity Breach and TCPA Class Action Suits [00:59:25]
    Jordan S. Elias, Robert J. Herrington
  • Hearing from the Judges: A Panel Presentation on How Judges Want Parties to Litigate Data Privacy, Security Breach Class Action Suits [01:00:40]
    Ian C. Ballon, Hon. James Donato, Hon. Andrew J. Guilford, Hon. Loretta A. Preska, Hon. Marilyn L. Huff
  • Mediation and Settlement Strategies for Data Security, Data Privacy and TCPA Class Action Suits [01:01:50]
    Ian C. Ballon, Scott A. Kamber, Jeff Kichaven, Christine M. Reilly, Hon. James Ware (Ret.)

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:


COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK

  • Federal Trade Commission, Privacy & Data Security (Update: 2016)
    Ian C. Ballon
  • Defending Security Breach Class Action Litigation (2017)
    Ian C. Ballon
  • Text Messaging and the Requirements of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (2017)
    Ian C. Ballon
  • Key Cases on Standing After Spokeo
    Rosemarie T. Ring, Timothy G. Blood
  • Opinion, Thomas Robins v. Spokeo, Inc., 867 F.3d 1108, No. 11-56843 (9th Cir. Aug. 15, 2017)
    Rosemarie T. Ring, Timothy G. Blood
  • Chantal Attias, et al. v. CareFirst, Inc., et al., 865 F.3d 620, No. 16-7108 (D.D.C. Aug. 1, 2017)
    Rosemarie T. Ring, Timothy G. Blood
  • Course Correction—Data Breach as Invasion of Privacy
    Jordan S. Elias
  • Defending Data Privacy Class Action Litigation (2017)
    Ian C. Ballon
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, TCPA Connect (September 27, 2017)
    Christine M. Reilly
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, TCPA Connect (August 24, 2017)
    Christine M. Reilly
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, TCPA Connect (July 26, 2017)
    Christine M. Reilly
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, TCPA Connect (June 29, 2017)
    Christine M. Reilly

Presentation Material


  • Trending Technology Issues in Data Security and Privacy Law
    Jonathan R. Mayer
  • Understanding Trends, Case Law and Strategy: How Best to Defend Data Privacy and Security Breach Class Action LItigation in 2018
    Ian C. Ballon
  • When is the right time to mediate?
    Jeff Kichaven
  • Mediation and Settlement Strategies for Data Security, Data Privacy and TCPA Class Action Suits
    Christine M. Reilly
Chairperson(s)
Ian C. Ballon ~ Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Speaker(s)
Hon. Laurel Beeler ~ Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California
Timothy G. Blood ~ Blood Hurst & O'Reardon LLP
Hon. James Donato ~ District Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jordan S. Elias ~ Girard Gibbs LLP
Hon. Andrew J. Guilford ~ District Judge, United States District Court, Central District of California, Southern Division
Bryan H. Heckenlively ~ Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP
Robert J. Herrington ~ Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Hon. Marilyn L. Huff ~ District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of Callifornia
Scott A. Kamber ~ KamberLaw, LLC
Jeff Kichaven ~ Mediator, Jeff Kichaven Commerical Mediation
Jonathan R. Mayer ~ Legislative Fellow, Office of Senator Kamala D. Harris
Hon. Loretta A. Preska ~ Senior District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Christine M. Reilly ~ Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Hon. James Ware (Ret.) ~ Mediator and Arbitrator, JAMS
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Share
Email
Great topic. Great presenters.”
Sara Merkert, Ocwen Financial

Love all the real-world information and examples. Discussion of the highest level.”
Margo Lynn Hablutzel, Computer Sciences Corporation


  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.