FacultyFaculty/Author Profile
Hon. Andrew J. Peck (Ret.)

Hon. Andrew J. Peck (Ret.)

DLA Piper LLP

New York City, NY, USA


The Honorable Andrew J. Peck served for 23 years as a United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of New York, including a term as Chief Magistrate Judge from 2004 to 2005. Before his appointment to the bench, Judge Peck was in private practice for 17 years, focusing on commercial and entertainment litigation, including copyright and trademark matters, with extensive trial experience.

At DLA Piper, Judge Peck advises on innovative and efficient solutions to the challenges of information management, both within and outside the litigation context. He frequently speaks at conferences concerning eDiscovery issues. Judge Peck also is available to serve as an arbitrator, mediator and Special Master.

Judge Peck is recognized internationally for bringing electronic discovery competency to the attention of both the judiciary and bar. Indeed, he is widely described as the first judge to tackle the subject of e-discovery head on, most notably in the influential 1995 decision Anti-Monopoly v. Hasbro, in which Judge Peck found that “it is black letter law that computerized data is discoverable if relevant.” Also among his legacy rulings is the 2011 employment class action Monique Da Silva Moore, et. al. v. Publicis Groupe & MSL Group, the first judicial decision approving the use of technology-assisted review. In March 2018, the New York Law Journal called Judge Peck “one of e-discovery’s most influential figures.”

Among the honors he has received, American Lawyer named him to its list of the Top 50 Innovators of the Last 50 Years as its Judicial E-Discovery Innovator.

 

Hon. Andrew J. Peck (Ret.) is associated with the following items:
CHB Chapters  CHB Chapters Tinto v. Vale, No. 14 Civ. 3042 (RMB)(AJP), 2015 WL 4367250 (S.D.N.Y. July 15, 2015) - Electronic Discovery 2018, Thursday, September 06, 2018
Fischer v. Forrest, No. 14 Civ. 1304 (PAE) (AJP), 14 Civ. 1307 (PAE) (AJP), 2017 WL 773694 (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 28, 2017) - Electronic Discovery 2018, Thursday, September 06, 2018
United States District Court, Southern District of New York, Sample Rule 502(d) Order - Electronic Discovery 2018, Thursday, September 06, 2018
Moore v. Publicis Groupe SA, et al., No. 11 Civ. 1279 (ALC)(AJP), 2012 WL 1446534 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 26, 2012) - Electronic Discovery 2018, Thursday, September 06, 2018
Hyles v. New York City, No. 10 Civ. 3119 (AT)(AJP), 2016 WL 4077114 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 1, 2016) - Electronic Discovery 2018, Thursday, September 06, 2018
Web Segment  Web Segment View from the Bench: E-Discovery Law – What the Judges Are Seeing - Hot Topics in Electronic Discovery 2018: What Corporate and Outside Counsel Need to Know, Wednesday, September 19, 2018
MP3 Audio  MP3 Audio View from the Bench: E-Discovery Law – What the Judges Are Seeing - View from the Bench: E-Discovery Law – What the Judges Are Seeing, Wednesday, September 19, 2018
Transcripts  Transcripts View from the Bench: E-Discovery Law – What the Judges Are Seeing - View from the Bench: E-Discovery Law – What the Judges Are Seeing, Wednesday, September 19, 2018
MP4 - Mobile Video Seg  MP4 - Mobile Video Seg View from the Bench: E-Discovery Law – What the Judges Are Seeing - View from the Bench: E-Discovery Law – What the Judges Are Seeing, Wednesday, September 19, 2018
On-Demand Web Programs  On-Demand Web Programs Hot Topics in Electronic Discovery 2018: What Corporate and Outside Counsel Need to Know, Monday, September 24, 2018, New York, NY
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.