On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Doing Business in and with Emerging Markets 2017

Released on: Jul. 16, 2017
Running Time: 06:09:34

Doing Business in and with Emerging Markets 2017 will provide a comprehensive overview of the most pressing legal issues involved in international deal making in and with emerging markets.

Attorneys and other professionals in the field will benefit from the insights offered by a stellar, international faculty, who will draw on decades of combined experience to share the best practices and most effective strategies they have learned and successfully employed. This program will bring together dozens of leading attorneys with global expertise, providing an excellent networking opportunity in addition to an unmatched learning experience.

You will learn:

  • Investing in emerging markets in challenging times
  • In-bound investments: dealing with emerging markets clients in the U.S., facilitating investment, including negotiating with the merging market investor, dealing with the most common impediments, and clearing regulatory hurdles
  • Recent developments in enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act involving emerging markets
  • Adhering to Foreign Corrupt Practices Act regulations as well as equivalent legislation in emerging markets, such as China’s commercial anti-bribery law
  • Issues arising from health care investments in emerging markets
  • The General Counsel’s perspective on emerging markets: what keeps them up at night

General counsel; lawyers practicing corporate law involving international transactions, investment, mergers, and acquisitions; and investment bankers or other professionals conducting transnational business will benefit from this program.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:09:34]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks and Introduction* [00:08:27]
    Alex Hao, Maurizio Levi-Minzi
  • Investing in Emerging Markets in Challenging Times [01:30:13]
    Alex Hao, Bruno Balduccini, Adam Li, Sergio Michelsen, Arun Balasubramanian
  • Emerging Markets’ Investments in Developed Markets [01:30:28]
    Anne Salladin, Fei Yin, Thomas S. Heather, Alexandra Burban, Maurizio Levi-Minzi
  • Anti-Corruption Issues in Emerging Markets [01:00:08]
    David Grosgold, Brian Markley, Janette Filbert, Marcio Mello Silva Baptista
  • Health Care Issues in Emerging Markets [00:58:34]
    Maria Fernanda de Almeida Prado e Silva, Sergio Michelsen, Isabella Wezdecki, David Grosgold
  • The General Counsel’s Perspective on Emerging Markets: What Keeps Them Up at Night [01:01:44]
    Alex Hao, Rodrigo Fuentes, Stephanie Xiaofeng Lin, William E. Markstein, Christian P. Mendoza

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:


  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • JunHe LLP, Recent Developments in Chinese Laws Affecting Foreign Investors
    Alex Hao
  • Narratives of Some Important Regulations That Have Major Impacts on Investing in China Since January 2016
    Adam Li
  • Bruno Balduccini and Karen Schiavon, Investment Opportunities in Brazil for the 2017 Year (March 2017)
    Bruno Balduccini
  • Investing in Colombia (March 2017)
    Maria Jimena Isaza, David Grosgold, Rodrigo Fuentes
  • Doing Business in and with Emerging Markets: M&A Transactions in Colombia During Challenging Times
    Sergio Michelsen Jaramillo
  • Investing in India: Overview and Recent Developments (June 2017) (PowerPoint slides)
    Arun Balasubramanian
  • Maurizio Levi-Minzi, Anna V. Maximenko, Geoffrey P. Burgess, Edward Drew Dutton, Paul M. Rodel, and Andrew Levine, BRICs Due Diligence: What You Need to Know (March 2017)
    Maurizio Levi-Minzi
  • BRICs Due Diligence: What You Need to Know—Nigeria (March 2017)
    Solomon Ezike, Kamoru Lawal, Maurizio Levi-Minzi
  • BRICs Due Diligence: What You Need to Know—Kenya (March 2017)
    Anne Kiunuhe, Edwina Warambo, Maurizio Levi-Minzi
  • BRICs Due Diligence: What You Need to Know—South Africa (March 2017)
    Maurizio Levi-Minzi, Charles Young, Tholinhlanhla Gcabashe, Xolani Ntamane
  • Jeffrey R. Keitelman, Anne W. Salladin, Amelia J. Schmidt, Chris Griner, Kim Pagotto, Christopher R. Brewster, Gregory Jaeger, and Shannon Reaves, What Real Estate Cos. Need to Know About CFIUS Reviews, Law360 (January 5, 2016)
    Anne W. Salladin
  • Chris Griner and Christopher R. Brewster, CFIUS Reviews are a Reality for More and More Cross-Border Transactions, The California International Law Journal, Vol. 24 No. 1 (Summer 2016)
    Anne W. Salladin
  • Anne W. Salladin and Amelia J. Schmidt, CFIUS post-Ralls: Ramifications for Sovereign Wealth Funds
    Anne W. Salladin
  • Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP, Special Bulletin, Second Helpings: New Legislation Would Give Agriculture and HHS Secretaries Seats at the CFIUS Table (March 21, 2017)
    Anne W. Salladin
  • Mexico as an Emerging Market Investor: Trade, Integration and Outbound Direct Investment in a Developed Market
    Thomas S. Heather
  • Brian Markley and Jennifer Potts, Pre-Acquisition Anti-Corruption Diligence in Emerging Markets M&A (April 28, 2017)
    Brian Markley
  • Andrew M. Levine, Farhana Choudhury, and William C. Mattessich, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, FCPA Update, Volume 8, No. 7, 2016 Corruption Perceptions Index Shows More Decline than Improvement (February 2017)
    David Grosgold
  • Andrew M. Levine, Bruce E. Yannett, and Jorge I. Valencia, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, FCPA Update, Volume 7, No. 11, Colombia Adopts New Law on Transnational Corruption (June 2016)
    David Grosgold
  • Sean Hecker, Andrew M. Levine, and Eileen Zelek, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, FCPA Update, Volume 8, No. 2, Mexico Adopts New Anti-Corruption Legislation (September 2016)
    David Grosgold
  • Colby A. Smith, Andrew M. Levine, and Philip Rohlik, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP, FCPA Update, Volume 8, No. 2, Charitable Donations as FCPA Violations: SEC Settles with Nu Skin Over Donation by Chinese Subsidiary (September 2016)
    David Grosgold
  • Overview: Brazil Nowadays (April 11, 2017)
    Shin Jae Kim
  • Maria Fernanda de Almeida Prado e Silva and Ana Candida Sammarco, Investments in the Health Care Sector in Brazil: Understanding the Regulatory Framework
    Maria Fernanda Prado
  • Systemic Risk and Funding: Regulation Challenges for Healthcare Transactions in Colombia
    Sergio Michelsen Jaramillo
  • Andrew L. Bab, Jennifer L. Chu, and Valerie A. Campbell, Current Trends in Health Care M&A (May 2017)
    Isabella Wezdecki
  • Practical Considerations in the Engagement of Foreign Counsel (June 2017)
    William E. Markstein
  • Brazil: Spinoffs of Portfolios of Insurance Businesses (May 1, 2017)
    David Grosgold, Khrystyna Rayko, Christian P. Mendoza
Co-Chair(s)
Alex Hao ~ JunHe LLP
Maurizio Levi-Minzi ~ Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Speaker(s)
Arun Balasubramanian ~ Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
Bruno Balduccini ~ Pinheiro Neto Advogados
Marcio Mello Silva Baptista ~ Tozzini Freire Teixeira e Silva Advogados
Alexandra Burban ~ Managing Director, Evercore
Janette Filbert ~ Vice President & Anti-Corruption Compliance Officer, Prudential Financial, Inc.
Rodrigo Fuentes ~ AXA Emerging Markets EMEA LATAM
David Grosgold ~ Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Thomas S. Heather ~ Senior Partner, Ritch, Mueller, Heather y Nicolau, S.C.
Adam Li ~ JunHe LLP
Stephanie Xiaofeng Lin ~ Counsel, Greenland USA
Brian Markley ~ Partner, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
William E. Markstein ~ Senior Vice President - Corporate; Deputy General Counsel, Trammo, Inc.
Christian P. Mendoza ~ Vice President & Chief M&A Counsel, Prudential Financial, Inc.
Sergio Michelsen ~ Brigard & Urrutia
Anne Salladin ~ Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP
Isabella Wezdecki ~ AGC, Johnson & Johnson
Fei Yin ~ Guotai Junan Securities USA, Inc.
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-traditional” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of non-traditional programs per reporting period.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 3 on-demand credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “A/V” credit. Attorneys are limited to 22.5 credits of A/V programs per reporting period.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as “QAS Self-Study” credit. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

 

Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • GooglePlus
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2017 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2017 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.