On-Demand   MP3 Audio
  Also Available in:  On-Demand On-Demand One-Hour Briefing

Fifth Circuit Vacates ERISA's Fiduciary Rule - Where (if Anywhere) Do We Go from Here?

Recorded on: Apr. 17, 2018
Running Time: 01:04:45

Taken from the Audio-only Briefing Recorded April 2018 in New York

Fifth Circuit Vacates ERISA's Fiduciary Rule - Where (if Anywhere) Do We Go from Here?
[01:04:45]

The Fifth Circuit's decision in Chamber of Commerce v. US Department of Labor represents a rebuke of the  Department of Labor’s (the "DOL") amended and controversial "investment advice" regulation under ERISA's fiduciary rules.  Depending on the end game here, this development not only could end the approximately eight-year process that began with the DOL’s initial proposal in 2010, but also could rank as being among the most significant developments in the ERISA area since the statute's enactment in 1974. 

The DOL’s amended regulation was preceded by the long-standing 1975 regulation that had defined investment advice with a five-part test.  For example, a person would not be regarded as an investment advice fiduciary unless investment advice was given regularly and would not be regarded as an “investment advice” fiduciary unless there was a mutual agreement that the advice was a primary basis for the recipient's decision-making.  The DOL identified a number of reasons for the changes, and the long and winding road for the regulation's revision began in earnest with the changeover to the Obama administration and related changes in key DOL personnel.

Eventually, amidst much controversy, and after an initial proposal was withdrawn following a firestorm of objection, an amended regulation (together with various new and amended exemptions) was finalized, again after significant comment and controversy, and became applicable on June 9, 2017.  ‎Many were surprised at this result, particularly after the Trump election and indications from the new administration about procedural and substantive concerns, including a Presidential Memorandum issued by the administration in February 2017.

Now, last month on March 15, 2018, the Fifth Circuit enters the fray with the Chamber of Commercedecision by determining that the regulation is unreasonable and is arbitrary and capricious, and by vacating the regulation (and the related exemptions) in its entirety.  In light of that decision, the parties to another case, National Association for Fixed Annuities v. US Department of Labor, agreed that the appeal to the DC Circuit in that case, where the district court below had upheld the regulation, would be dropped, thereby further increasing the likelihood that the key ongoing judicial activity regarding the regulation would center on the Chamber of Commerce case (although there are other pending cases as well).

So where do we go from here?  Will the DOL proceed in support‎ of the regulation?  And, if the DOL chooses not to appeal or otherwise contest the Fifth Circuit's opinion, is it simply "game over" for the regulation, regardless of what may happen in other courts?

These and other questions will be addressed by our panelists.  The panelists will also discuss pending activity by the Securities and Exchange Commission, initiatives at the state level and at organizations like the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, and how the market may react if the regulation does not survive.

Please join attorneys who have been at the forefront of the analysis surrounding the fiduciary regulation, and the lead attorney who argued the NAFA case referred to above.  The panel will consist of Philip D. Bartz of Bryan Cave LLP, who litigated the NAFA case, and Steven W. Rabitz of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP.  The discussion will be moderated by Andrew L. Oringer of Dechert LLP, who has hosted our series of Hot Topic Briefings on various ERISA cases as they are decided.

Topics to be addressed will include:

  • How did we get to where we are? (background)
  • What happens now? (procedurally)
  • Where do we go from here? (both in terms of the fate of the rule and the effect on the market)


Presentation Material

  • Chamber of Commerce v. US Department of Labor: Fifth Circuit Vacates ERISA's Fiduciary Rule – Where (if Anywhere) Do We Go From Here
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • Dechert NewsFlash: Chipping Away - Does the DOL's Fiduciary Rule Continue to Be on the Chopping Block?
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • Dechert NewsFlash: Drip Drip Drip - Is the DOL's Fiduciary Rule Slowly Going Down the Drain?
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • Dechert NewsFlash: ERISA's Fiduciary Rule Vacated - "When Congress Has Acted with a Scalpel, It Is Not for the Agency to Wield a Cudgel"
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • Dechert OnPoint: ERISA's Fiduciary Rule - Dead Yet? Game Over? Maybe, Maybe Not . . .
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • Dechert OnPoint: ERISA's Fiduciary Rule – Not Dead Yet, Not Dead . . . Ever?
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • Dept of Fin Serv: GOVERNOR CUOMO ANNOUNCES NEW CONSUMER PROTECTIONS FOR LIFE INSURANCE SALES
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • Law 360: DOL's Fiduciary Rule: Death By A Thousand Cuts?
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • Nevada Senate Bill No. 383–Senator Ford
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • NYS Dept of Fin Serv Proposed 1st Ammendment to 11 NYCRR 224
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • Outside-IN: The Amazing Vanishing DOL Fiduciary Rule?
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • Scott Trade Inc. Administrative Complaint
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
  • Strook Special Bulletin: IDES OF MARCH SPECIAL: 5TH CIRCUIT ASSASSINATES DOL FIDUCIARY RULE
    Philip D. Bartz, Andrew L. Oringer, Steven W. Rabitz
A
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017,  all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments do not qualify for credit.

Iowa:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional MP3 audio segments can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional MP3 audio segments. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via MP3 audio segments.

North Carolina:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via MP3 audio segments.

Wyoming:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6credits of self-study per reporting period.

CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits on MP3 audio segments vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.

Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select MP3 audio segments qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s MP3 audio segments may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s MP3 audio segments are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.