On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

TechLaw Institute 2017: The Digital Evolution

Released on: Mar. 9, 2017
Running Time: 09:24:25

We are in the midst of a digital evolution. Technology continues to evolve and disrupt at breakneck speed, outpacing existing laws and regulations. As a result, businesses face challenges on all fronts on a daily basis.  Employees working from home and on the road present new and unique challenges for employers. Data breaches are not a matter of if, but when, stealing precious hours of sleep from information and compliance managers and C-suite executives.  Household appliances, devices and vehicles are becoming wirelessly inter-connected, this expanding the ever-increasing ecosystem of “Internet of things.” New technologies are also impacting the way lawyers manage their practices resulting in increased and more complex ethical challenges. Marketing and advertising firms that seek to exploit these new technologies also face challenges and legal risks in navigating these unchartered new waters.

Courts, clients and colleagues expect lawyers to stay abreast of this evolution – and have the answers they raise.  Clients in particular demand sophisticated counsel that provide insight and value to help them solve their technology-related issues and grow their technology-reliant businesses.

This year’s TechLaw Institute 2017: The Digital Evolution will provide you with the information they need to serve their clients in this ever-changing environment.  You will learn about security issues affecting new technology; legal issues raised by the emerging “Internet of Things”, as well as by disruptive and sharing technologies.  Our speakers will share how companies can exploit all of the marketing possibilities that social media sites offer, while at the same time managing attendant risks.  Hear from industry experts how big data is driving the digital economy, and from regulators who will explain how these initiatives can threaten consumer rights and privacy.  You will hear about the virtual workspace, and how companies are grappling with the security, compliance, and employment issues that come with it.  Experts will also address ethical issues raised by new technology, and how that technology is altering the practice of law.

You will learn:

  • Issues relating to big data and data analytics
  • The emerging Internet of Things, and how it may change the legal landscape
  • Disruptive and sharing technologies and their impact on the legal landscape
  • How the virtual workspace is changing business
  • How hackers attack corporate computer systems and how to respond
  • Recent developments in technology litigation
  • The impact of new technologies on legal ethics
  • How technology is changing the way we practice law

This program is designed for technology and IP lawyers, in-house counsel and outside counsel, and all lawyers who need to stay current on the cutting edge of legal issues relating to technology.  Business professionals, computer professionals and information managers who need to keep up-to-date with the dramatic changes in this area will also find this program valuable.

Lecture Topics [Total time 09:24:25]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.


  • Introductory Remarks* [00:06:56]
    Marc S. Roth, James G. Snell
  • Emerging, Disruptive, and Sharing Technologies [01:03:29]
    John C. Yates, Keith Yandell, Laura C. Pirri
  • The Virtual Workplace [00:59:35]
    Esra A. Hudson, Scott Maples
  • Cloud Computing, SaaS, and Outsourcing [01:05:50]
    Keith L. Larney
  • Hot Topics in Tech Law Litigation [01:02:05]
    Tyler G. Newby, Michele Lee, Nikki S. Sokol
  • Cybersecurity, Hacking, and Data Breach [00:59:10]
    Joseph V. DeMarco, Justin Chang, Matthew Ahn, Elyse M. Dreyer, Matthew Parrella
  • Evolving Legal Ethics: Portable Devices, the Cloud, and Social Media [01:02:00]
    Pamela A. Bresnahan, Lucian T. Pera
  • The Internet of Things and the Wired Life [01:00:10]
    James G. Snell, Karen M. McGee
  • Emerging Issues in Big Data and Analytics [01:01:50]
    Christin McMeley, Laura D. Berger, Martin J Collins, Tristan Ostrowski
  • Reaching Consumers in a Digital World: Marketing, Advertising, and Social Media [01:03:20]
    Tsan Abrahamson, Marc S. Roth

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:


  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Emerging, Disruptive and Sharing Technologies: What Is the Sharing Economy and Where Is It Going? (December 10, 2016)
    John C. Yates
  • The Virtual Workplace (December 9, 2016)
    Joseph J. Lazzarotti
  • Cloud Computing, SaaS and Outsourcing
    Keith L Larney, Bonnie L Yeomans, Michelle Perez
  • Hot Issues in Tech Law Litigation
    Tyler G. Newby, Philip Blum, Manas Mohapatra
  • Brief of Amici Curiae, Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, Inc., and National Sheriffs’ Association in Support of the Government, In re Apple v. FBI, No. CM 16-10-SP (E.D. Cal. 2016)
    Joseph V. DeMarco
  • U.S. v. Knowles, No. 16 Cr. 005 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y 2016)
    Joseph V. DeMarco
  • The Use of Cloud Computing, Mobile Devices and Social Media in the Practice of Law (December 9, 2016)
    Pamela A. Bresnahan, Lucian T. Pera
  • Summary of 2016 Internet of Things Cases (January 2017)
    Christian Lee, James G. Snell
  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, Report to the President—Big Data and Privacy: A Technological Perspective (May 2014)
    Christin S. McMeley
  • The White House, Interim Progress Report, Big Data: Seizing Opportunities, Preserving Values (February 2015)
    Christin S. McMeley, Noga Rosenthal
  • Julie Brill, Commissioner, U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Speech, Keynote Address Before the 23rd Computers Freedom and Privacy Conference (June 26, 2013)
    Noga Rosenthal
  • Digital Advertising Alliance, Application of the Self-Regulatory Principles of Transparency and Control to Data Used Across Devices (November 2015)
    Noga Rosenthal
  • U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Press Release, FTC Warns Marketers That Mobile Apps May Violate Fair Credit Reporting Act (February 7, 2012)
    Noga Rosenthal
  • U.S. Federal Trade Commission, Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion? Understanding the Issues (January 2016)
    Noga Rosenthal
  • Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, European Commission, Statement on Statement of the WP29 on the impact of the development of big data on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of their personal data in the EU (September 16, 2014)
    Noga Rosenthal
  • Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP, Advertising Law Newsletter (January–November 2016)
    Marc S. Roth

Presentation Material


  • Emerging, Disruptive, and Sharing Technologies
    John C. Yates
  • The Virtual Workplace
    Esra A. Hudson, Scott Maples
  • Cloud Computing, SaaS, and Outsourcing
    Keith L. Larney
  • Hot Topics in Tech Law Litigation
    Michele Lee, Tyler G. Newby, Nikki S. Sokol
  • Evolving Legal Ethics: Portable Devices, the Cloud, and Social Media
    Pamela A. Bresnahan, Lucian T. Pera
  • The Internet of Things and the Wired Life
    Karen M. McGee, James G. Snell
  • Reaching Consumers in a Digital World: Marketing, Advertising, and Social Media
    Tsan Abrahamson, Marc S. Roth
Co-Chair(s)
Marc S. Roth ~ Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
James G. Snell ~ Perkins Coie LLP
Moderator(s)
Joseph V. DeMarco ~ DeVore & DeMarco LLP
Christin McMeley ~ Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Speaker(s)
Tsan Abrahamson ~ Cobalt LLP
Matthew Ahn ~ Senior Corporate Counsel, Oracle America, Inc.
Laura D. Berger ~ Attorney, Division of Privacy and Identity Protection, Federal Trade Commission
Pamela A. Bresnahan ~ Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP
Justin Chang ~ Digital Realty Trust, L.P.
Martin J. Collins ~ Senior Vice President, Corporate Development, Legal & Compliance, QuinStreet
Elyse M. Dreyer ~ Sotheby’s
Esra A. Hudson ~ Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
Keith L. Larney ~ VP & Managing Assistant General Counsel, CA Technologies
Michele Lee ~ Twitter Inc.
Scott Maples ~ Former Vice President, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary, Ruckus Wireless, Inc.
Karen M. McGee ~ Assistant Director, Privacy and Security , Intel Corporation
Tyler G. Newby ~ Of Counsel, Fenwick & West LLP
Tristan Ostrowski ~ Google Inc
Matthew Parrella ~ Chief, Computer Hacking/Intellectual Property United States Attorney’s Office Northern District of California , United States Attorneys Office
Lucian T. Pera ~ Adams and Reese LLP
Laura C. Pirri ~ Legal Director, Global Privacy and Data Protection, Twitter
Nikki S. Sokol ~ Associate General Counsel, Litigation, Facebook Legal
Keith Yandell ~ General Counsel , DoorDash, Inc.
John C. Yates ~ Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-traditional” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of non-traditional programs per reporting period.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 3 on-demand credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “A/V” credit. Attorneys are limited to 22.5 credits of A/V programs per reporting period.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as “QAS Self-Study” credit. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

Outsourcing 2018: ITO, BPO and Cloud (New York, NY) Nov. 1 - 2, 2018
Outsourcing 2018: ITO, BPO and Cloud (Chicago, IL) Oct. 1 - 2, 2018
TechLaw Institute 2018: The Digital Evolution (New York, NY) Mar. 28 - 29, 2018
TechLaw Institute 2018: The Digital Evolution (San Francisco, CA) Mar. 5 - 6, 2018

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

Outsourcing 2017: ITO, BPO and Cloud Nov. 9, 2017

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Outsourcing 2018: ITO, BPO and Cloud  
TechLaw Institute 2018: The Digital Evolution  
Outsourcing 2017: ITO, BPO and Cloud George Kimball, Wiggin & Dana LLP
William A Tanenbaum, Arent Fox LLP
John F Delaney, Morrison & Foerster LLP
Michael S Mensik, Baker & McKenzie LLP
Brad L Peterson, Mayer Brown LLP
 
TechLaw Institute 2017: The Digital Evolution James G Snell, Perkins Coie LLP
Philip Blum, CA Technologies
Marc S Roth, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • GooglePlus
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2017 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2017 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.