On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs
  Also Available in:  On-Demand MP3 Audio On-Demand MP4 - Mobile Video Seg

Ethics and Conflicts of Interest in Law Practice 2017

Released on: Aug. 8, 2017
Running Time: 02:01:05

A practical review of how conflicts of interest in law practice arise and helpful approaches in managing them.

An experienced faculty, including law firm general counsel, will review current developments in conflicts of interest and their practical takeaways, delivering useful insights for attorneys of all backgrounds.  The agenda will address how to spot potential and actual conflicts, determine if such conflicts can be waived, as well as how to craft effective waivers.

Topics Include:

  • Relevant Rules of Professional Conduct
  • Recent developments in conflict-of-interest law
  • How to identify potential and actual conflicts
  • How to determine whether a conflict may be waived
  • How to craft effective conflict waivers

Special Features:

  • Earn up to two hours of ethics credit

Credit Available:

  • CLE, CPD
Lecture Topics [Total time 02:01:05]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Introduction* [00:02:32]
  • Ethics and Conflicts of Interest in Law Practice 2017 [01:58:33]
    Jennifer A. Paradise, Ellen L. Hayes, Julie A. Turner, James Q. Walker

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:


  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • New York Rules of Professional Conduct (Effective January 1, 2017)
  • Conflicts of Interest
    Jennifer A. Paradise
  • New York Bar Opinions
    Ellen L. Hayes, Jennifer A. Paradise, Julie A. Turner, James Q. Walker
  • NYCLA Committee on Professional Ethics Formal Opinion No. 724
    Ellen L. Hayes, James Q. Walker, Jennifer A. Paradise, Julie A. Turner
  • Kirk v. First Amendment Title Ins. Co., 183 Cal. App. 4th 776
    Jennifer A. Paradise, Ellen L. Hayes, Julie A. Turner, James Q. Walker
  • United States District Court Southern District of New York—Maricultura Del Norte, S. DE R.L. DE C.V., et al. v. Worldbusiness Capital, Inc., et al.
    Ellen L. Hayes, James Q. Walker, Julie A. Turner, Jennifer A. Paradise
  • Debevoise & Plimpton, LLP, Client Update: D.C. Circuit Upholds Privilege Protections in Compliance Investigations (July 3, 2014)
    Helen V. Cantwell

Presentation Material


  • Current Client and Former Client Conflicts and the Imputation Rule
    Ellen L. Hayes, Jennifer A. Paradise, Julie A. Turner, James Q. Walker
Chairperson(s)
Jennifer A. Paradise ~ General Counsel, White & Case LLP
Speaker(s)
Ellen L. Hayes ~ Linklaters LLP
Julie A. Turner ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
James Q. Walker ~ Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-traditional” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of non-traditional programs per reporting period.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 3 on-demand credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “A/V” credit. Attorneys are limited to 22.5 credits of A/V programs per reporting period.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as “QAS Self-Study” credit. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

Staying Out of Trouble 2018: Hot Topics in Ethics and Avoiding Professional Discipline (New York, NY) Dec. 20, 2018
Ethics for Corporate Lawyers 2018 (New York, NY) Dec. 20, 2018
Ethics and Conflicts of Interest in Law Practice 2018 (New York, NY) Aug. 7, 2018
The Attorney-Client Privilege and Internal Investigations 2018 (New York, NY) Aug. 7, 2018
Ethics in Discovery 2018 (New York, NY) Jun. 27, 2018
Ethics for In-House Corporate Counsel 2018 (New York, NY) Jun. 27, 2018
Staying Out of Trouble: Ethical Necessities 2018 (Chicago, IL) May. 14, 2018
Ethics for Financial Industry Lawyers 2018 (New York, NY) Mar. 12, 2018
Ethics for Commercial Litigators 2018 (New York, NY) Feb. 23, 2018
Ethics for the Negotiating Lawyer 2018 (New York, NY) Jan. 22, 2018
Ethics for Corporate Lawyers 2017 (New York, NY) Dec. 21, 2017
Staying Out of Trouble 2017: Hot Topics in Ethics and Avoiding Professional Discipline (New York, NY) Dec. 21, 2017

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

Ethics for Government Lawyers 2018 Mar. 8, 2018
The Attorney-Client Privilege and Internal Investigations 2017 Aug. 10, 2017
Ethics for In-House Corporate Counsel 2017 Jul. 17, 2017
Ethics for Discovery 2017 Jul. 14, 2017
Ethics for Government Lawyers 2017 Apr. 20, 2017
Ethics for Commercial Litigators 2017 Mar. 1, 2017
Ethics for Financial Industry Lawyers 2017 Feb. 22, 2017
Ethics for the Negotiating Lawyer 2017 Jan. 24, 2017
Ethics for Corporate Lawyers 2016 Jan. 3, 2017

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Staying Out of Trouble 2018: The Intra-Firm Attorney-Client Privilege and Ethics and Technology Quiz Show  
Staying Out of Trouble: Ethical Necessities 2018  
Ethics for the Negotiating Lawyer 2018  
Winter Ethics 2017 David G Keyko, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Ronald C Minkoff, Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, PC
 
Ethics in Context: August 2017 Jennifer A Paradise, White & Case LLP
Helen V Cantwell, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
 
Staying Out of Trouble: Ethical Necessities 2017 John C Koski, Dentons US LLP
 
Ethics for Financial Industry Lawyers 2017 Yasamine H Viehland, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Ethics Office
David Sarratt, Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Howard Schneider, Charles River Associates
Michael S Sackheim, Sidley Austin LLP
David Rabinowitz, Moses & Singer LLP
C. Evan Stewart, Cohen & Gresser LLP
 
Ethics for the Negotiating Lawyer 2017  
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • GooglePlus
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2017 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2017 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.