On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Banking Law Institute 2017

Released on: Dec. 8, 2017
Running Time: 07:06:16
In addition to the credits listed to the right, this program also offers credit for ABA professional certification. Banking Law Institute 2017 has been approved for 1.25 CAFP, 7.5 CRCM, 5 CSOP credits. This statement should not be viewed as an endorsement of this program or its sponsor.

Banking law and regulation is never complete, but the landscape achieved what may be considered relative stability in the recent post crisis years.  Yet with a new political environment came renewed calls for overhauling current regulations, leaving the future of the regulatory environment harder to assess and plan around. 

New developments in financial regulatory agency leadership and priorities are giving the financial industry reason to prepare for major changes, but until that possibility matures into a reality, industry players mostly continue to plod on, contending with the current legal and regulatory framework while keeping an eye on key areas that could see significant updates. 

The Federal Reserve Board continues to adjust its capital planning and stress-testing requirements depending institution size and scope.  Proposed reforms to capital planning requirements are a hot point of discussion with the industry waiting to see how a final, stricter "Basel IV" standard will manifest.

The industry continues to balance its business interest in and defensive response to new fintech products and services, posing both an increasing challenge and unique opportunity for the industry establishment.  Lurking in the shadows, cybersecurity remains a growing concern as banks and financial institutions continue to stand as prime targets for hacks, ransomware and other data breaches. 

The Banking Law Institute continues to serve as an authoritative forum for industry experts to share their insights on the major legal and regulatory concerns for all industry participants.  This is the program for lawyers and industry professionals to attend for a timely review of what matters in the field.    

Lecture Topics [Total time 07:06:16]
Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.


  • Introduction* [00:06:20]
    William J. Sweet, Jr., Lee A. Meyerson
  • Regulatory Developments in Banking [01:02:50]
    William D. Haas, Randall D. Guynn, Kieran J. Fallon, Benjamin W. McDonough
  • FinTech and Regulation of the Digital Future [00:58:19]
    Beth Knickerbocker, Jessie Cheng, Brian K. Victor, Daniel Gorfine
  • Foreign Banking Organizations [01:02:28]
    Derek M. Bush, Betty Whelchel, Michael F. Coyne, Richard Coffman
  • M&A in the Banking Sector [00:58:58]
    Alison M. Thro, Elizabeth A. Cooper, Mitchell S. Eitel, Sean D. Carmody
  • Cybersecurity Threats to the Banking Sector [00:58:15]
    Donald L. Vieira, Shawn Henry, Adam Hickey
  • Shareholder Activism [00:59:33]
    Arthur B. Crozier, Lauren D. Gojkovich, Nicholas G. Demmo, Amy Lissauer
  • Consumer Financial Enforcement [00:59:27]
    Jonice Gray Tucker, Nicholas Smyth, Brian Montgomery, Donna Murphy, Malini Mithal

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:


  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Materials from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
    William J. Sweet, Jr.
  • Financial Services Regulatory Reform in 2017: A reference tool to be updated from time to time (October 2, 2017) (PowerPoint slides)
    Randall D. Guynn
  • Status of Financial Regulatory Leadership Changes (October 2, 2017)
    Randall D. Guynn
  • How Payments Law Can Help Drive Innovation
    Jessie Cheng
  • Semiannual Report on Banking Applications Activity: July 1–December 31, 2016
    Alison M. Thro
  • Implementation of a New Process for Requesting Guidance from the Federal Reserve Regarding Bank and Nonbank Acquisitions and Other Proposals (July 11, 2012)
    Alison M. Thro
  • State Member Bank Branching Considerations (April 5, 2013)
    Alison M. Thro
  • Enhancing Transparency in the Federal Reserve’s Applications Process (February 24, 2014)
    Alison M. Thro
  • Supervisory Concerns Related to Shareholder Protection Arrangements (December 3, 2015)
    Alison M. Thro
  • Executive Order 13772: U.S. Supervision and Regulation of International Banks: Recommendations for the Report of the Treasury Secretary (April 28, 2017)
    Sally A. Miller
  • New York State Cybersecurity Regulations for Financial Institutions are Tough, Critical, and Reach Beyond State Borders (August 29, 2017)
    Shawn Henry
  • Mergers and Acquisitions: Cybersecurity Due Diligence (April 18, 2016)
    Shawn Henry
  • Top 5 Cybersecurity Mistakes Companies Make and How to Avoid Them (November 24, 2015)
    Shawn Henry
  • Critical Infrastructure: One More Thing to Give Thanks For—and Protect (November 22, 2016)
    Shawn Henry
  • BlackRock Releases 2017–2018 Governance Engagement Priorities (March 2017)
    Lauren D. Gojkovich
  • Investor Coalition Publishes U.S. Stewardship Code (January 2017)
    Lauren D. Gojkovich
  • Vanguard Announcements Highlight Significant Shifts Relating to Environmental Proposals, Board Diversity and CEO-Led Engagement (September 2017)
    Lauren D. Gojkovich

Presentation Material

  • Financial Agency Transition: Practising Law Institute
    Kieran J. Fallon
  • Financial Services Regulatory Reform in 2017
    Randall D. Guynn
  • States of Financial Regulatory Leadership Changes
    Randall D. Guynn
  • Shareholder Activism
    Amy Lissauer
Co-Chair(s)
Lee A. Meyerson ~ Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
William J. Sweet, Jr. ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Speaker(s)
Derek M. Bush ~ Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
Sean D. Carmody ~ Centerview Partners LLC
Jessie Cheng ~ Counsel, International Monetary Fund
Richard Coffman ~ Institute of International Bankers
Elizabeth A. Cooper ~ Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Michael F. Coyne ~ MUFG Americas
Arthur B. Crozier ~ Chairman, Innisfree M&A Incorporated
Nicholas G. Demmo ~ Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz
Mitchell S. Eitel ~ Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Kieran J. Fallon ~ Senior Deputy General Counsel, The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.
Lauren D. Gojkovich ~ Principal, CamberView Partners, LLC
Daniel Gorfine ~ U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Randall D. Guynn ~ Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
William D. Haas ~ Deputy Comptroller, Midsize Bank Supervision; Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, U.S. Department of the Treasury
Shawn Henry ~ CrowdStrike
Adam Hickey ~ United States Department of Justice
Beth Knickerbocker ~ Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Amy Lissauer ~ Managing Director, Evercore
Benjamin W. McDonough ~ Senior Counsel, Federal Reserve Board
Malini Mithal ~ Acting Associate Director, Division of Financial Practices, Federal Trade Commission
Brian H. Montgomery ~ New York State Department of Financial Services
Donna Murphy ~ Director for Community and Consumer Law, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
Nicholas Smyth ~ Pennsylvania Office of Attorney General
Alison M. Thro ~ Federal Reserve Board
Jonice Gray Tucker ~ BuckleySandler LLP
Brian K. Victor ~ Vice President & Associate General Counsel, Social Finance, Inc.
Donald L. Vieira ~ Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
Betty Whelchel ~ U.S. Head of Public Policy & Regulatory Affairs, BNP Paribas
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

Banking Law Institute 2019 (New York, NY) Nov. 12, 2019
Banking Law Institute 2018 (New York, NY) Nov. 30, 2018

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Banking Law Institute 2019  
Banking Law Institute 2018  
Banking Law Institute 2017 William J. Sweet, Jr., Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Lee A. Meyerson, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.