Seminar  Program

Advanced Patent Licensing 2018


Select a Location:

Why You Should Attend

In the current legal environment, with patent litigation on the decline (especially in the U.S.), patent licensing (and related transactions) are heating up. Experts in patent licensing will discuss how to negotiate patent license agreements, review examples of best (and, in some cases, worst) practices, and share current legal developments affecting patent licensing. Practical tips for structuring, negotiating and drafting patent licenses, with strategies for both the licensor and licensee, will be emphasized. 

 

Topics Include

• Tips on monetizing patents and/or resisting monetization invitations

• Exploring patent and/or license enforcement considerations

• Updates on the patent monetization environment in the U.S. and abroad

• Best practices from experts at Silicon Valley’s best companies/firms

• Discovering litigation trends from recent years affecting IP licensing generally

• Understanding how specific court cases have (in some ways) expanded and/or (in other ways) shrunken patenting, licensing, enforcement and/or patent challenge opportunities

• Learning how to update traditional patent licensing provisions in light of recent case law

• Identifying frequently contested provisions and how to negotiate them

 

Special Features

• Actual Agreements: analysis of patent license agreement provisions by 5 national experts

• Mock patent licensing negotiation

 

Who Should Attend

This program is geared toward those who need to offer patents for licensing, respond to patent licensing offers, draft and negotiate patent licenses, and enforce patent license agreements. In addition, intellectual property lawyers, corporate counsel, and others involved in the utilization of patents as business assets will benefit from attending.


PLI Group Discounts

Groups of 4-14 from the same organization, all registering at the same time, for a PLI program scheduled for presentation at the same site, are entitled to receive a group discount. For further discount information, please contact membership@pli.edu or call (800) 260-4PLI.

PLI Can Arrange Group Viewing to Your Firm

Contact the Groupcasts Department via email at groupcasts@pli.edu for more details.

Cancellations

All cancellations received 3 business days prior to the program will be refunded 100%. If you do not cancel within the allotted time period, payment is due in full. You may substitute another individual to attend the program at any time.

9:00 Opening Remarks

Mark S. Holmes, Joseph Yang



9:15 Opening the Negotiation; Strategic & Business Aspects of Structuring the Patent License Agreement Grant
  • Inviting the other side to negotiate
  • How to avoid declaratory judgments
  • Land mines v. safe harbors?
  • Licensed rights: list vs. capture period; patents vs. claims
  • Setting the license term: life of patents vs. the guillotine, etc.
  • The license grant: broad vs. narrow
  • License fee structures and other financial considerations
  • The interplay between license fees and license scope

Burch A. Harper, Robert P. Taylor



10:15 Networking Break

10:30 What’s Changed Since Last Year?: New Court Decisions Affecting Patent Licensing
  • Where is the pendulum now? – Big picture trends relative to prior years
  • The interplay among the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court
  • Litigating the AIA: court reactions to the PTAB’s delegated decision-making authority
  • Exhaustion – have we reached the end yet?
  • Pro-licensor developments vs. pro-license developments
  • Decisions affecting licensing opportunities, licensing practices, and enforcement/defense
  • Practice tips for prosecutors, licensing attorneys and litigators

Joseph Yang



11:30 A Deeper Look at Deal Dynamics & Terms: Analysis of a Patent License Agreement
  • Learn from experienced licensing attorneys using clauses taken from actual agreements
  • The 60-page license agreement: Want to learn where the land mines are?
  • Are you a deal killer? Sometimes you should be. Learn when.
  • Why would licensees want to pay for prosecution of licensor's patents?
  • When to sublicense and how to protect yourself
  • Not all licenses are created equal: how to get the upper hand
  • Are patent owners becoming more willing to indemnify against patent infringement?
  • You want to pay me in what currency? How to get royalties back to the States
  • When arbitration works. When it fails.
  • Fields of Use or Fields of Dreams? How territorial and use restrictions can maximize revenues
  • Why negotiating licenses are different from M&A and other transactions

Mark S. Holmes, Panel Leader; Suzanne Y. Bell, William H. Hamby, Winston E. Henderson, Meredith M. McKenzie



12:30 Lunch

1:30 A Deeper Look at Deal Dynamics & Terms: Analysis of a Patent License Agreement, Continued

2:30 Networking Break

2:45 What’s New in the World of Standards-Essential Patents & RAND Licensing, and Implications for Established & Emerging Industries
  • Recent legal decisions
  • Negotiation behavior: process/dynamics/obligations
  • RAND license terms: structure & royalty rate issues
  • What is reasonable?
  • What is non-discriminatory?
  • Comparing U.S., European and Asian perspectives
  • The role of SEPs and RAND in emerging industries

Joseph Yang, Panel Leader; Rick C. Chang, Khue V. Hoang



4:15 Issue Spotting & Live Mock Deal Negotiation of a Patent License: A Panel of Patent Licensing Specialists
  • Structuring the license grant
  • What happens when licensed products are made in one country and sold elsewhere (patent coverage, royalty base, tracking, etc.)?
  • Royalty, reporting, and other economic considerations
  • Reps and warranties and/or indemnity
  • Dispute resolution issues (choice of law, arbitration, etc.)
  • Statutory restrictions (competition law, misuse, grantbacks)
  • Industry-specific contrasts and pointers (e.g., electronics v. biopharma)
  • Other considerations

Joseph Yang, Panel Leader; Jake Handy, Nader A. Mousavi



5:45 Adjourn

Co-Chair(s)
Mark S. Holmes ~ CEO, PatentBridge LLC
Joseph Yang ~ PatentEsque Law Group, LLP
Speaker(s)
Suzanne Y. Bell ~ Covington & Burling LLP
Rick C. Chang ~ Foley & Lardner LLP
William H. Hamby ~ Corporate Counsel, Specialty Products Division, DowDuPont™
Jake Handy ~ Fenwick & West LLP
Burch A. Harper ~ Vice President and Deputy General Counsel for Intellectual Property, Kateeva, Inc.
Winston E. Henderson ~ Vice President, General Counsel, Nano Terra, Inc.
Khue V. Hoang ~ Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Meredith M. McKenzie ~ Vice President & Deputy General Counsel, IP, Juniper Networks, Inc.
Nader A. Mousavi ~ Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Robert P. Taylor ~ RPT Legal Strategies PC
Program Attorney(s)
Ivo Mijac ~ Senior Program Manager, California, PLI

San Francisco Seminar Location

PLI California Center, 685 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105. (800) 260-4754.

San Francisco Hotel Accommodations

Park Central Hotel, 50 Third Street, San Francisco, CA 94103. 415-974-6400. When calling, please mention PLI and SET#287179. In addition, you may book online at Park Central Hotel PLI.

Omni Hotel San Francisco, 500 California Street, San Francisco, CA 94104. 415-677-9494.  When calling, please mention Practising Law Institute.  You may also book online at PLI Omni 2018.

Due to high demand we recommend reserving hotel rooms as early as possible.

General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama: PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

California:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Illinois: All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Iowa:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Kansas:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live programs.

Kentucky:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Louisiana:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Maine:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Minnesota:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Mississippi:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Missouri:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Montana:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Nebraska:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Nevada:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

New Mexico:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional live seminars can be used to fulfill the requirements for newly admitted attorneys. All credit categories may be earned via transitional live seminars.

North Carolina:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars

North Dakota:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Ohio:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania: PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

South Carolina:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Tennessee:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Vermont:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live interactive” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live interactive programs.

Washington:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

West Virginia:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Wyoming:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “real-time” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via real-time programs.

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “interactive” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC): PLI’s live seminars can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of points an attorney can earn via live seminars.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s live seminars can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit in all Australian jurisdictions. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.

Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA): PLI’s live seminars qualify as the “Group-Live” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE): PLI’s live seminars may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as "instructor-led" credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an SHRM professional can earn via instructor-led programs.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” training events. There is no limit to the number of credits a candidate or certification holder can earn via live programs.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (CAMS):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill CAMS credit requirements.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill SW CPE credit requirements.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill CFP credit requirements.

 

Why You Should Attend

In the current legal environment, with patent litigation on the decline (especially in the U.S.), patent licensing (and related transactions) are heating up. Experts in patent licensing will discuss how to negotiate patent license agreements, review examples of best (and, in some cases, worst) practices, and share current legal developments affecting patent licensing. Practical tips for structuring, negotiating and drafting patent licenses, with strategies for both the licensor and licensee, will be emphasized. 

 

Topics Include

• Tips on monetizing patents and/or resisting monetization invitations

• Exploring patent and/or license enforcement considerations

• Updates on the patent monetization environment in the U.S. and abroad

• Best practices from experts at Silicon Valley’s best companies/firms

• Discovering litigation trends from recent years affecting IP licensing generally

• Understanding how specific court cases have (in some ways) expanded and/or (in other ways) shrunken patenting, licensing, enforcement and/or patent challenge opportunities

• Learning how to update traditional patent licensing provisions in light of recent case law

• Identifying frequently contested provisions and how to negotiate them

 

Special Features

• Actual Agreements: analysis of patent license agreement provisions by 5 national experts

• Mock patent licensing negotiation

 

Who Should Attend

This program is geared toward those who need to offer patents for licensing, respond to patent licensing offers, draft and negotiate patent licenses, and enforce patent license agreements. In addition, intellectual property lawyers, corporate counsel, and others involved in the utilization of patents as business assets will benefit from attending.


PLI Group Discounts

Groups of 4-14 from the same organization, all registering at the same time, for a PLI program scheduled for presentation at the same site, are entitled to receive a group discount. For further discount information, please contact membership@pli.edu or call (800) 260-4PLI.

PLI Can Arrange Group Viewing to Your Firm

Contact the Groupcasts Department via email at groupcasts@pli.edu for more details.

Cancellations

All cancellations received 3 business days prior to the program will be refunded 100%. If you do not cancel within the allotted time period, payment is due in full. You may substitute another individual to attend the program at any time.

9:00 Opening Remarks

Mark S. Holmes, Joseph Yang



9:15 Opening the Negotiation; Strategic & Business Aspects of Structuring the Patent License Agreement Grant
  • Inviting the other side to negotiate
  • How to avoid declaratory judgments
  • Land mines v. safe harbors?
  • Licensed rights: list vs. capture period; patents vs. claims
  • Setting the license term: life of patents vs. the guillotine, etc.
  • The license grant: broad vs. narrow
  • License fee structures and other financial considerations
  • The interplay between license fees and license scope

Burch A. Harper, Robert P. Taylor



10:15 Networking Break

10:30 What’s Changed Since Last Year?: New Court Decisions Affecting Patent Licensing
  • Where is the pendulum now? – Big picture trends relative to prior years
  • The interplay among the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court
  • Litigating the AIA: court reactions to the PTAB’s delegated decision-making authority
  • Exhaustion – have we reached the end yet?
  • Pro-licensor developments vs. pro-license developments
  • Decisions affecting licensing opportunities, licensing practices, and enforcement/defense
  • Practice tips for prosecutors, licensing attorneys and litigators

Joseph Yang



11:30 A Deeper Look at Deal Dynamics & Terms: Analysis of a Patent License Agreement
  • Learn from experienced licensing attorneys using clauses taken from actual agreements
  • The 60-page license agreement: Want to learn where the land mines are?
  • Are you a deal killer? Sometimes you should be. Learn when.
  • Why would licensees want to pay for prosecution of licensor's patents?
  • When to sublicense and how to protect yourself
  • Not all licenses are created equal: how to get the upper hand
  • Are patent owners becoming more willing to indemnify against patent infringement?
  • You want to pay me in what currency? How to get royalties back to the States
  • When arbitration works. When it fails.
  • Fields of Use or Fields of Dreams? How territorial and use restrictions can maximize revenues
  • Why negotiating licenses are different from M&A and other transactions

Mark S. Holmes, Panel Leader; Suzanne Y. Bell, William H. Hamby, Winston E. Henderson, Meredith M. McKenzie



12:30 Lunch

1:30 A Deeper Look at Deal Dynamics & Terms: Analysis of a Patent License Agreement, Continued

2:30 Networking Break

2:45 What’s New in the World of Standards-Essential Patents & RAND Licensing, and Implications for Established & Emerging Industries
  • Recent legal decisions
  • Negotiation behavior: process/dynamics/obligations
  • RAND license terms: structure & royalty rate issues
  • What is reasonable?
  • What is non-discriminatory?
  • Comparing U.S., European and Asian perspectives
  • The role of SEPs and RAND in emerging industries

Joseph Yang, Panel Leader; Rick C. Chang, Khue V. Hoang



4:15 Issue Spotting & Live Mock Deal Negotiation of a Patent License: A Panel of Patent Licensing Specialists
  • Structuring the license grant
  • What happens when licensed products are made in one country and sold elsewhere (patent coverage, royalty base, tracking, etc.)?
  • Royalty, reporting, and other economic considerations
  • Reps and warranties and/or indemnity
  • Dispute resolution issues (choice of law, arbitration, etc.)
  • Statutory restrictions (competition law, misuse, grantbacks)
  • Industry-specific contrasts and pointers (e.g., electronics v. biopharma)
  • Other considerations

Joseph Yang, Panel Leader; Jake Handy, Nader A. Mousavi



5:45 Adjourn

Co-Chair(s)
Mark S. Holmes ~ CEO, PatentBridge LLC
Joseph Yang ~ PatentEsque Law Group, LLP
Speaker(s)
Suzanne Y. Bell ~ Covington & Burling LLP
Rick C. Chang ~ Foley & Lardner LLP
William H. Hamby ~ Corporate Counsel, Specialty Products Division, DowDuPont™
Jake Handy ~ Fenwick & West LLP
Burch A. Harper ~ Vice President and Deputy General Counsel for Intellectual Property, Kateeva, Inc.
Winston E. Henderson ~ Vice President, General Counsel, Nano Terra, Inc.
Khue V. Hoang ~ Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Meredith M. McKenzie ~ Vice President & Deputy General Counsel, IP, Juniper Networks, Inc.
Nader A. Mousavi ~ Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Robert P. Taylor ~ RPT Legal Strategies PC
Program Attorney(s)
Ivo Mijac ~ Senior Program Manager, California, PLI
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered. If two or more individuals wish to participate in a webcast and receive credit, PLI would be happy to provide a Groupcast – group viewing of a webcast. To schedule a Groupcast, please contact PLI at groupcasts@pli.edu.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

California:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Kansas:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Kentucky:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Louisiana:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Minnesota:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Mississippi:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Montana:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Nebraska:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional live webcasts can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Ethics credit, professional practice credit, and law practice management credit may be earned via transitional live webcasts. Skills credits may not be earned via live webcasts.

North Carolina:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

North Dakota:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Ohio:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

South Carolina:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live interactive” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live interactive programs.

Washington:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

West Virginia:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Wyoming:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “real-time” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via real-time programs.

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “interactive” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s live webcasts can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 points of distance learning programs per reporting period.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s live webcasts can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for live webcasts vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.

Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as the “Group-Internet-Based” (GIB) delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as "instructor-led" credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an SHRM professional can earn via instructor-led programs.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” training events. There is no limit to the number of credits a candidate or certification holder can earn via live programs.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (CAMS):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill CAMS credit requirements.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill SW CPE credit requirements.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill CFP credit requirements.

 

Related Items

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

Advanced Patent Licensing 2017 Oct. 5, 2017

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Advanced Patent Licensing 2018  
Advanced Patent Licensing 2017 Mark S Holmes, PatentBridge LLC
Joseph Yang, PatentEsque Law Group, LLP
 
Share
Email
Really just a top quality program with quality speakers.”
Richard Malagiere, The Law Offices of Richard Malagiere, P.C.


  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.