Seminar  Program

35th Annual Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation


Select a Location:

Why You Should Attend

The law of Section 1983 is multifaceted, in some respects complex, and continues to develop.  To be an effective Section 1983 litigator, it is necessary to have an in-depth understanding of the various aspects of Section 1983 litigation and to stay abreast of the latest developments.  At PLI’s 35th Annual Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation program, a highly experienced and accomplished faculty will analyze the most important aspects of the law of Section 1983 as well as recent trends and developments.  The faculty includes federal appellate and district court judges, experienced Section 1983 plaintiff’s and defendant’s practitioners, a law school dean, and authors of texts and articles on the law of Section 1983.  

 

What You Will Learn

This year’s program covers a number of vital subjects, including:

  • Recent developments in Fourth Amendment law governing arrests, use of force, and searches
  • In-depth analysis of qualified immunity
  • Supervisory liability
  • Municipal liability (focus on custom and usage)
  • Demonstrative evidence in actions against law enforcement

 

Who Should Attend

The program is designed for all attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants in Section 1983 litigation.


PLI Group Discounts

Groups of 4-14 from the same organization, all registering at the same time, for a PLI program scheduled for presentation at the same site, are entitled to receive a group discount. For further discount information, please contact membership@pli.edu or call (800) 260-4PLI.

PLI Can Arrange Group Viewing to Your Firm

Contact the Groupcasts Department via email at groupcasts@pli.edu for more details.

Cancellations

All cancellations received 3 business days prior to the program will be refunded 100%. If you do not cancel within the allotted time period, payment is due in full. You may substitute another individual to attend the program at any time.

9:00 Opening Remarks



9:15 Claims Against Law Enforcement Officers: Arrests, Force, Searches and Speech

One of the nation’s leading constitutional scholars analyzes Supreme Court decisions of this past term governing challenges to arrests, police use of force and searches.
• Probable cause to arrest
• Police vehicle searches
• Cell phone tracking by law enforcement
• Excessive force claims

Speaker: Dean Erwin Chemerinsky

Panelists: Professor Emerita Karen M. Blum, Peter G. Farrell, Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, Professor Emeritus Martin A. Schwartz, Hon. James A. Wynn, Jr.



10:30 Break



10:45 Qualified Immunity: An In-Depth Analysis

• Meaning of clearly established law
• Summary judgement practice
• Qualified immunity when facts are in dispute
• Recent appellate decisions

Part A: The Law and Practice of Qualified Immunity
A federal circuit court judge analyzes recent appellate qualified immunity decisions concerning, inter alia, when law is clearly established, what is “fair notice”, and summary judgment qualified immunity practice. 

Part B: Qualified Immunity When Facts Are In Dispute
A leading expert on qualified immunity discusses the application of qualified immunity when facts are in dispute.

Speakers: Hon. James A. Wynn, Jr. (Part A), Professor Emerita Karen M. Blum (Part B)

District Court Perspective: Hon. Brenda K. Sannes

Panelists: Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Peter G. Farrell, Professor Alex Reinert, Professor Emeritus Martin A. Schwartz



11:45 Break



12:00 Supervisory Liability

An analysis of the fault and causation standards governing the liability of supervisory officials, presented by the attorney who argued a major case on this issue in the United States Supreme Court.
• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
• Post-Iqbal developments
• Causation and culpability issues
• Illustrative fact patterns

Speaker: Professor Alex Reinert

Panelists: Professor Emerita Karen M. Blum, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Peter G. Farrell, Zoe Salzman, Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, Professor Emeritus Martin A. Schwartz, Hon. James A. Wynn, Jr.



1:00 Lunch



2:00 Municipal Liability: Focus on Municipal Custom and Practice – A Discussion

The program chair will lead a discussion about the meaning of municipal custom and practice, including: 
• Claims alleging inadequate training and supervision
• When municipal liability claims require a showing of deliberate indifference
• Proof of municipal custom and practice
• Bifurcation of claims against the officer and municipality

Speaker: Professor Emeritus Martin A. Schwartz

Panelists: Professor Emerita Karen M. Blum, Frederick K. Brewington, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Peter G. Farrell, Professor Leon Friedman, Hon. James A. Wynn, Jr. 



3:15 Break



3:30 Demonstrative Evidence in Actions Against Law Enforcement

The law and practice of demonstrative evidence in Section 1983 actions  against law enforcement officers. An experienced Section 1983 litigator will present actual illustrations of her use of demonstrative evidence in federal court Section 1983 litigation.
• Importance of Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 403
• Preparation of demonstrative exhibits
• Strategic considerations

Speaker: Zoe Salzman

Commentator: Peter G. Farrell

Panelists: Professor Emerita Karen M. Blum, Frederick K. Brewington, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Genevieve Nelson, Professor Emeritus Martin A. Schwartz



4:45 Adjourn

Chairperson(s)
Martin A. Schwartz ~ Professor Emeritus of Law, Touro Law Center
Speaker(s)
Professor Karen M. Blum ~ Professor Emerita, Suffolk University Law School
Frederick K. Brewington ~ Law Offices of Frederick K. Brewington
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley School of Law
Peter G. Farrell ~ Deputy Chief, Special Federal Litigation Division, New York City Law Department, Office of the Corporation Counsel
Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law
Genevieve Nelson ~ Senior Counsel, Special Federal Litigation Division, New York City Law Department, Office of the Corporation Counsel
Professor Alex Reinert ~ Professor of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Zoe Salzman ~ Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP
Hon. Brenda K. Sannes ~ United States District Judge, Northern District of New York
Hon. James A. Wynn, Jr. ~ United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Program Attorney(s)
Janet L. Siegel ~ Senior Program Attorney, Practising Law Institute
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered. If two or more individuals wish to participate in a webcast and receive credit, PLI would be happy to provide a Groupcast – group viewing of a webcast. To schedule a Groupcast, please contact PLI at groupcasts@pli.edu.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

California:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Kansas:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Kentucky:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Louisiana:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Minnesota:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Mississippi:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Montana:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Nebraska:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional live webcasts can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Ethics credit, professional practice credit, and law practice management credit may be earned via transitional live webcasts. Skills credits may not be earned via live webcasts.

North Carolina:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

North Dakota:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Ohio:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

South Carolina:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live interactive” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live interactive programs.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

Wyoming:  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live webcasts.

CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “real-time” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via real-time programs.

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “interactive” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s live webcasts can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 points of distance learning programs per reporting period.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s live webcasts can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for live webcasts vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.

Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as the “Group-Internet-Based” (GIB) delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as "instructor-led" credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an SHRM professional can earn via instructor-led programs.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s live webcasts qualify as “live” training events. There is no limit to the number of credits a candidate or certification holder can earn via live programs.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (CAMS):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill CAMS credit requirements.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill SW CPE credit requirements.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s live webcasts may fulfill CFP credit requirements.

 

Why You Should Attend

The law of Section 1983 is multifaceted, in some respects complex, and continues to develop.  To be an effective Section 1983 litigator, it is necessary to have an in-depth understanding of the various aspects of Section 1983 litigation and to stay abreast of the latest developments.  At PLI’s 35th Annual Section 1983 Civil Rights Litigation program, a highly experienced and accomplished faculty will analyze the most important aspects of the law of Section 1983 as well as recent trends and developments.  The faculty includes federal appellate and district court judges, experienced Section 1983 plaintiff’s and defendant’s practitioners, a law school dean, and authors of texts and articles on the law of Section 1983.  

 

What You Will Learn

This year’s program covers a number of vital subjects, including:

  • Recent developments in Fourth Amendment law governing arrests, use of force, and searches
  • In-depth analysis of qualified immunity
  • Supervisory liability
  • Municipal liability (focus on custom and usage)
  • Demonstrative evidence in actions against law enforcement

 

Who Should Attend

The program is designed for all attorneys representing plaintiffs and defendants in Section 1983 litigation.


PLI Group Discounts

Groups of 4-14 from the same organization, all registering at the same time, for a PLI program scheduled for presentation at the same site, are entitled to receive a group discount. For further discount information, please contact membership@pli.edu or call (800) 260-4PLI.

PLI Can Arrange Group Viewing to Your Firm

Contact the Groupcasts Department via email at groupcasts@pli.edu for more details.

Cancellations

All cancellations received 3 business days prior to the program will be refunded 100%. If you do not cancel within the allotted time period, payment is due in full. You may substitute another individual to attend the program at any time.

9:00 Opening Remarks



9:15 Claims Against Law Enforcement Officers: Arrests, Force, Searches and Speech

One of the nation’s leading constitutional scholars analyzes Supreme Court decisions of this past term governing challenges to arrests, police use of force and searches.
• Probable cause to arrest
• Police vehicle searches
• Cell phone tracking by law enforcement
• Excessive force claims

Speaker: Dean Erwin Chemerinsky

Panelists: Professor Emerita Karen M. Blum, Peter G. Farrell, Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, Professor Emeritus Martin A. Schwartz, Hon. James A. Wynn, Jr.



10:30 Break



10:45 Qualified Immunity: An In-Depth Analysis

• Meaning of clearly established law
• Summary judgement practice
• Qualified immunity when facts are in dispute
• Recent appellate decisions

Part A: The Law and Practice of Qualified Immunity
A federal circuit court judge analyzes recent appellate qualified immunity decisions concerning, inter alia, when law is clearly established, what is “fair notice”, and summary judgment qualified immunity practice. 

Part B: Qualified Immunity When Facts Are In Dispute
A leading expert on qualified immunity discusses the application of qualified immunity when facts are in dispute.

Speakers: Hon. James A. Wynn, Jr. (Part A), Professor Emerita Karen M. Blum (Part B)

District Court Perspective: Hon. Brenda K. Sannes

Panelists: Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Peter G. Farrell, Professor Alex Reinert, Professor Emeritus Martin A. Schwartz



11:45 Break



12:00 Supervisory Liability

An analysis of the fault and causation standards governing the liability of supervisory officials, presented by the attorney who argued a major case on this issue in the United States Supreme Court.
• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
• Post-Iqbal developments
• Causation and culpability issues
• Illustrative fact patterns

Speaker: Professor Alex Reinert

Panelists: Professor Emerita Karen M. Blum, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Peter G. Farrell, Zoe Salzman, Hon. Brenda K. Sannes, Professor Emeritus Martin A. Schwartz, Hon. James A. Wynn, Jr.



1:00 Lunch



2:00 Municipal Liability: Focus on Municipal Custom and Practice – A Discussion

The program chair will lead a discussion about the meaning of municipal custom and practice, including: 
• Claims alleging inadequate training and supervision
• When municipal liability claims require a showing of deliberate indifference
• Proof of municipal custom and practice
• Bifurcation of claims against the officer and municipality

Speaker: Professor Emeritus Martin A. Schwartz

Panelists: Professor Emerita Karen M. Blum, Frederick K. Brewington, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Peter G. Farrell, Professor Leon Friedman, Hon. James A. Wynn, Jr. 



3:15 Break



3:30 Demonstrative Evidence in Actions Against Law Enforcement

The law and practice of demonstrative evidence in Section 1983 actions  against law enforcement officers. An experienced Section 1983 litigator will present actual illustrations of her use of demonstrative evidence in federal court Section 1983 litigation.
• Importance of Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 403
• Preparation of demonstrative exhibits
• Strategic considerations

Speaker: Zoe Salzman

Commentator: Peter G. Farrell

Panelists: Professor Emerita Karen M. Blum, Frederick K. Brewington, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Genevieve Nelson, Professor Emeritus Martin A. Schwartz



4:45 Adjourn

Chairperson(s)
Martin A. Schwartz ~ Professor Emeritus of Law, Touro Law Center
Speaker(s)
Professor Karen M. Blum ~ Professor Emerita, Suffolk University Law School
Frederick K. Brewington ~ Law Offices of Frederick K. Brewington
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Jesse H. Choper Distinguished Professor of Law, University of California, Berkeley School of Law
Peter G. Farrell ~ Deputy Chief, Special Federal Litigation Division, New York City Law Department, Office of the Corporation Counsel
Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law
Genevieve Nelson ~ Senior Counsel, Special Federal Litigation Division, New York City Law Department, Office of the Corporation Counsel
Professor Alex Reinert ~ Professor of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
Zoe Salzman ~ Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP
Hon. Brenda K. Sannes ~ United States District Judge, Northern District of New York
Hon. James A. Wynn, Jr. ~ United States Circuit Judge, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Program Attorney(s)
Janet L. Siegel ~ Senior Program Attorney, Practising Law Institute

New York City Seminar Location

PLI New York Center
, 1177 Avenue of the Americas, (2nd floor), entrance on 45th Street, New York, New York 10036. (800) 260-4754.

New York City Hotel Accommodations

Crowne Plaza Times Square Manhattan, 1605 Broadway (48th Street), New York, NY 10019 (212) 977-4000. When calling, mention Practising Law Institute. You can also make reservations online to access PLI's rates.

The Muse, 130 West 46th Street, New York, NY 10036. Please call reservations at 1-800-546-7866. When calling, please mention Practising Law Institute and Corporate Rate ID 786839408. In addition, you can book online at PLI Muse Hotel

Millennium Broadway Hotel, 145 West 44th Street, New York, NY 10036. Please call reservations at 1-800-622-5569. When calling, please mention Practising Law Institute. In addition, you can book online at PLI Millennium Hotel .

 Hyatt Times Square, 135 W. 45th Street, New York, NY 10036. For reservations, please call (646) 364-1234. When calling mention rate code CR56218 or Practising Law Institute.

General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama: PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

California:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Illinois: All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Iowa:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Kansas:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live programs.

Kentucky:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Louisiana:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Maine:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Minnesota:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Mississippi:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Missouri:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Montana:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Nebraska:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Nevada:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

New Mexico:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional live seminars can be used to fulfill the requirements for newly admitted attorneys. All credit categories may be earned via transitional live seminars.

North Carolina:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars

North Dakota:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Ohio:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania: PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

South Carolina:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Tennessee:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Vermont:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live interactive” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live interactive programs.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Wyoming:  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “real-time” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via real-time programs.

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “interactive” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC): PLI’s live seminars can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit. There is no limit to the number of points an attorney can earn via live seminars.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s live seminars can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” credit in all Australian jurisdictions. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via live seminars.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.

Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA): PLI’s live seminars qualify as the “Group-Live” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE): PLI’s live seminars may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as "instructor-led" credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an SHRM professional can earn via instructor-led programs.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s live seminars qualify as “live” training events. There is no limit to the number of credits a candidate or certification holder can earn via live programs.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists (CAMS):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill CAMS credit requirements.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill SW CPE credit requirements.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s live seminars may fulfill CFP credit requirements.

 

Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.