On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Trial by Jury 2018

Released on: Nov. 14, 2018
Running Time: 06:09:32
You won’t want to miss this popular program, in which the masters of the bar and the bench come together to give you valuable and useful insights on jury trials. We have assembled the most experienced and respected state and federal judges, as well as many distinguished litigators, to give you their perspectives on jury trials. There is no better way to learn about jury trial practice than from the attorneys who try the nation’s most important cases and the judges who preside over them.

Whether you are new to your career as a trial attorney or an experienced courtroom litigator, this course will give you a unique view into jury trials and the best way to handle them, from opening statements through closing arguments.  Our faculty will also dissect the ethical issues that often arise and the best ways to handle these situations. Join us to gain proven strategies and practical tools to successfully manage every phase of your next jury case.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:09:32]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:07:36]
    David R. Marriott
  • Picking the Best Possible Jury [01:02:52]
    Douglas A. Cawley, Hon. Jeffrey K. Oing, Hon. Loretta A. Preska, William F. Lee
  • Delivering an Effective Opening Statement [00:58:26]
    Hon. Richard J. Sullivan, Theodore V. Wells Jr., Morgan Chu, Brooke E. Cucinella
  • Conducting an Effective Direct/Redirect Examination [01:00:21]
    Hon. Richard M. Berman, David R. Marriott, John S. Siffert
  • Ethical Issues in Jury Trials [01:01:05]
    Hon. John Gleeson, Lawrence J. Zweifach, Jason Brown, David R. Marriott
  • Conducting an Effective Cross-Examination [00:58:32]
    Michael A. Jacobs, Evan R. Chesler, Hon. Edgardo Ramos, Hon. Lorna G. Schofield
  • Making a Compelling Closing Argument [01:00:37]
    Hon. Barry R. Ostrager, Gregory A. Markel, Hon. Gregory H. Woods, Hon. Kiyo A. Matsumoto

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Jury Selection: Suggestions for Picking Your Best Triers of Fact
    Stefan H. Atkinson, Richard M. Berman, David R. Marriott
  • Richard Waites, J.D., Ph.D., The Advocates—Jury and Trial Consultants, Mastering Voir Dire and Jury Selection in Accordance with ABA Formal Opinion No. 466
    David R. Marriott
  • Richard Waites, J.D., Ph.D., The Advocates—Jury and Trial Consultants, Working with Trial Consultants
    David R. Marriott
  • Caren Myers Morrison, Investigating Jurors on Social Media, Pace Law Review, Volume 35, Issue 1 (Fall 2014)
    David R. Marriott
  • Jury Questionnaire, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
    David R. Marriott
  • The Opening Statement: Charting a Path to Victory
    Richard J. Sullivan, David R. Marriott, Alison B. Miller
  • Lewis S. Wiener and Ronald W. Zdrojeski, Ch. 14: The Art of the Persuasive Opening Statement: Finding Your Inner Storyteller, American Bar Association, From the Trenches: Strategies and Tips from 21 of the Nation’s Top Trial Lawyers (December 2015)
    David R. Marriott
  • Ben Rubinowitz and Evan Torgan, From Opening to Summation, Making First Impressions Count, New York Law Journal (June 5, 2015)
    David R. Marriott
  • Transcript of Opening Statements, Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., C-11-01846 LHK (N.D. Cal. 2012)
    David R. Marriott
  • Direct to Success: How to Conduct an Effective Direct Examination
    Lauren R. Kennedy, David R. Marriott, John G. Gleeson
  • Rick R. Fuentes, Ph.D., Using Storytelling Techniques to Craft a Persuasive Legal Story, The Criminal Practice Report, Volume 11, No. 18
    David R. Marriott
  • Frank C. Jones and Chilton Davis Varner, Direct Examination: Making the Facts Understandable
    David R. Marriott
  • Jon R. Muth, Direct Examination: A Forgotten Art, Trial Practice, Michigan Bar Journal (May 2013)
    David R. Marriott
  • Trial Transcript, In re: Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 02-5571 (October 6, 2009)
    David R. Marriott
  • Richard Waites, A Practical Approach in Navigating Ethical Issues During Trial Preparation for Trial Attorneys and Trial Consultants
    David R. Marriott
  • Cross Examination: Nine Suggestions for Success
    Rebecca Rettig, Loretta A. Preska, David R. Marriott
  • Fred T. Friedman, UNC School of Government Trial, Cross-Examination Skills
    David R. Marriott
  • Robert MacFarlane, Fundamentals of the Art of Cross-Examination
    David R. Marriott
  • Transcript, Compuware Corporation v. International Business Machines Corporation, Case No. 02-CV-70906 (March 11, 2005)
  • Hon. Raymond J. Dearie, David R. Marriott and David Lisner, Closing to Win: Closing Argument: Suggestions for Effective Advocacy
    David R. Marriott
  • R.W. Howard Lightle, Closing Argument in a Civil Trial
    David R. Marriott
  • Edgar M. Elliott, IV, Closing Argument from the Defense Perspective
    David R. Marriott
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals v. Teva Pharmaceuticals, Civil No. 05-cv-1887-DMC (D.N.J. 2009)

Presentation Material

  • Trial by Jury (Introduction)
    David R. Marriott
  • Closing Arguments
    Gregory A. Markel
Chairperson(s)
David R. Marriott ~ Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Speaker(s)
Hon. Richard M. Berman ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jason Brown ~ Cohen & Gresser LLP
Douglas A. Cawley ~ McKool Smith, P.C.
Evan R. Chesler ~ Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Morgan Chu ~ Irell & Manella LLP
Brooke E. Cucinella ~ Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Hon. John Gleeson ~ Debevoise & Plimpton LLP
Michael A. Jacobs ~ Morrison & Foerster LLP
William F. Lee ~ Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP
Gregory A. Markel ~ Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Hon. Kiyo A. Matsumoto ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Hon. Jeffrey K. Oing ~ Associate Justice, Appellate Division, First Department, New York State Supreme Court
Hon. Barry Ostrager ~ Justice, New York County Supreme Court, Commercial Division
Hon. Loretta A. Preska ~ Senior District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Hon. Edgardo Ramos ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Hon. Lorna G. Schofield ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
John S. Siffert ~ Lankler Siffert & Wohl LLP
Hon. Richard J. Sullivan ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Theodore V. Wells Jr. ~ Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Hon. Gregory H. Woods ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court,Southern District of New York
Lawrence J. Zweifach ~ Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

Trial by Jury 2019 (New York, NY) Nov. 1, 2019

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Trial by Jury 2019  
Trial by Jury 2018 David R. Marriott, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2019 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2019 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.