On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Developments in Antitrust Law & Regulation 2018

Released on: Apr. 20, 2018
Running Time: 12:52:43

This year’s program will examine recent developments in several key areas of antitrust reflected in recent decisions as well as vigorous enforcement in the US and around the world.  Panels or nationally known practitioners and senior government enforcement officials will report on and explore developments in competitor relationships, including cartels and other per se antitrust violations as well as the antitrust implications of joint ventures and other competitor collaborations; the legality of various vertical restraints on customers and suppliers;  current merger analysis and enforcement; standards for compliance with U.S. price discrimination laws; and the strategies and priorities of the antitrust enforcers, including increased cooperation among U.S. and foreign competition authorities.

Lecture Topics [Total RunTime: 12:52:43]
Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:03:58]
    Saul P. Morgenstern, Yvonne S. Quinn, Harvey I. Saferstein
  • Current Issues in Monopolization [01:26:01]
    Daniel G. Swanson
  • Antitrust Considerations in Acquisitions and Mergers [01:17:24]
    Yvonne S. Quinn
  • Relationships among Competitors:  Lawful Collaborations, Unreasonable Restraints and Cartels [01:33:03]
    Saul P. Morgenstern
  • Ethical Issues in Antitrust Investigations [01:01:25]
    Laura S. Shores
  • What Lawyers Need to Know About International Antitrust Law [01:13:31]
    Lisl J. Dunlop
  • Current Legal Problems at the Interface of IP Law and Competition Law [01:14:56]
    Robert P. Taylor
  • Evolving Standards on Resale Price Maintenance, Tying and Other Vertical Restraints [01:00:56]
    Craig G. Falls
  • Discrimination in Price and Promotions [01:15:23]
    Harvey M. Applebaum, Harvey I. Saferstein
  • Enforcement Issues and Opportunities for Antitrust Practitioners [01:45:09]
    Heather S. Tewksbury, Patricia A. Conners, Bernard (Barry) A. Nigro Jr., William H. Efron
  • The Intersection Between Antitrust, Ethics, and Compliance [01:00:56]
    Theodore L. Banks

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:


COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK

  • Daniel G. Swanson and Cynthia E. Richman, Monopolization and Attempted Monopolization (2018)
    Daniel G. Swanson
  • U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, Horizontal Merger Guidelines (August 19, 2010)
    Yvonne S. Quinn
  • Saul P. Morgenstern, Margaret A. Rogers, Travis Clark, Jesse Feitel, and Leah Harrell, Cartels and Other Horizontal Relationships (February 22, 2018)
    Saul P. Morgenstern
  • Ethical Considerations in Antitrust Investigations (February 22, 2018)
    Laura S. Shores
  • U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, Antitrust Guidelines for International Enforcement and Cooperation (January 13, 2017)
    Lisl J. Dunlop
  • International Competition Network, Press Release, The International Competition Network Approves New Work on Effective Competition Enforcement and Advocacy (May 12, 2017)
    Lisl J. Dunlop
  • International Competition Network, Summary of ICN Work Product: 2016–2017 (May 10–12, 2017)
    Lisl J. Dunlop
  • Intellectual Property Rights Meet Antitrust Law: Outcomes Without Principles (February 20, 2018)
    Robert P. Taylor
  • Evolving Standards on Resale Price Maintenance, Tying and Other Vertical Restraints
    Craig G. Falls
  • Robinson-Patman Act: Buyer Liability, Discrimination in Promotional Allowances and Services, and Brokerage (January 2018)
    Harvey M. Applebaum
  • State Antitrust Enforcement (April 2018)
    Patricia A. Conners
  • Legal Ethics, Antitrust and Compliance (February 1, 2018)
    Theodore L. Banks
  • An Overview and Update of the Federal and State Law of Price Discrimination
    Harvey I. Saferstein

Presentation Material


  • Current Issues in Monopolization
    Daniel G. Swanson
  • Antitrust Considerations in Acquisitions and Mergers
    Yvonne S. Quinn
  • Relationships among Competitors: Lawful Collaborations, Unreasonable Restraints and Cartels
    Saul P. Morgenstern
  • Ethical Issues in Antitrust Investigations
    Laura S. Shores
  • What Lawyers Need to Know About International Antitrust Law
    Lisl J. Dunlop
  • Current Legal Problems at the Interface of IP Law and Competition Law
    Robert P. Taylor
  • Evolving Standards on Resale Price Maintenance, Tying and Other Vertical Restraints
    Craig G. Falls
  • Discrimination in Price and Promotions
    Harvey M. Applebaum, Harvey I. Saferstein
  • The Intersection Between Antitrust, Ethics, and Compliance
    Theodore L. Banks
Co-Chair(s)
Saul P. Morgenstern ~ Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
Yvonne S. Quinn ~ Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Harvey I. Saferstein ~ Vice President, General Counsel , Sportsman Cap and Bag
Speaker(s)
Harvey M. Applebaum ~ Covington & Burling LLP
Theodore L. Banks ~ President, Compliance & Competition Consultants, LLC, Scharf Banks Marmor LLC
Patricia A. Conners ~ Chief Deputy, Office of the Attorney General of Florida
Lisl J. Dunlop ~ Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
William H. Efron ~ Director, Northeast Region, Federal Trade Commission
Craig G. Falls ~ Dechert LLP
Bernard (Barry) A. Nigro Jr. ~ Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division, US DOJ
Heather S. Nyong’o ~ WilmerHale
Laura S. Shores ~ Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
Daniel G. Swanson ~ Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
Robert P. Taylor ~ RPT Legal Strategies PC
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

Developments in Antitrust Law & Regulation 2019 (New York, NY) Apr. 10 - 11, 2019

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Developments in Antitrust Law & Regulation 2019  
Developments in Antitrust Law & Regulation 2018 Yvonne S. Quinn, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Saul P. Morgenstern, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer LLP
Harvey I. Saferstein, Sportsman Cap and Bag
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.