On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

20th Annual Commercial Real Estate Institute

Select a Location:

Improving the skills of identifying, appreciating and weighing your client’s leverage in negotiating the commercial real estate fundamentals (rents, vacancy rates and development activity) will be the focus of the 2018 Commercial Real Estate Institute. Practitioners with this understanding will find it easier to achieve and maintain a viable real estate practice where their advice adds value. This program helps practicing attorneys enhance those abilities while performing the traditional transactional skills, and while developing workout and enforcement skills, so that they can help their clients take advantage of their leverage and regain any lost footing more quickly.

Lecture Topics [Total time 12:34:30]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • OPENING REMARKS* [00:03:05]
    Richard C. Mallory
  • STATE OF THE MARKET AND PURCHASES, SALES AND CLOSING [01:52:10]
    Jodi B. Fedor, Danna M. Kozerski, Mark McGranahan
  • COMMERCIAL LEASING [01:32:05]
    Richard C. Mallory, Manuel Fishman
  • MORTGAGE FINANCING [01:30:15]
    Andrea L. Clay, David I. Paulson, Stephen P. Lieske
  • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION: A TOOLKIT FOR TRANSACTIONAL LAWYERS [01:30:10]
    Denis F. Shanagher, Robert Charles Ward
  • JOINT VENTURES [01:17:35]
    Beth Pennington, David A. Hamsher
  • ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS [01:15:20]
    Nicholas W. Targ
  • CONSTRUCTION ISSUES [01:16:20]
    Richard Van Duzer
  • THE IMPACT OF TAX REFORM ON COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE [01:16:05]
    Stephen Moskowitz
  • ETHICAL ISSUES FACING REAL ESTATE ATTORNEYS [01:01:25]
    Robert S. Miller, Carol M. Langford

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Purchases, Sales and Closing (August 2018)
    Jonathan L. Mechanic
  • Purchases, Sales and Closings
    Jodi B. Fedor, Danna M. Kozerski
  • Form of Purchase and Sale Agreement
    Danna M. Kozerski, Jodi B. Fedor
  • Form of Closing Checklist—Responsibility and Status Schedule
    Danna M. Kozerski, Jodi B. Fedor
  • Purchase and Sale Agreement Checklist
    Lawrence C. Eppley, Alexandra R. Cole
  • Purchases, Sales and Closing (PowerPoint slides)
    Lawrence C. Eppley, Alexandra R. Cole
  • Manuel Fishman and Lotus Fung, Reinforcing the Basics of a Landlord Consent to Assignment of Lease BRE DDR BR Whittwood v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach, 14 Cal. App. 5th 992 (2017)
    Manuel Fishman
  • Commercial Leases Overview
    Richard C. Mallory
  • Mezzanine Financing: The Basics (August 2018)
    Steven R. Davidson
  • Real Estate Financing Overview (July 26, 2018)
    Andrea L. Clay, David I. Paulson, Stephen P. Lieske
  • How to Make Your Real Estate Litigator Happy: A Mini-Compendium of Practical Suggestions (July 24, 2018)
    Michael A. Weinberg
  • The Real Estate Litigation Primer for the Transactional Lawyer (June 2018)
    Mitchell D. Haddad
  • Menachem J. Kastner and Ally Hack, Real Estate Transactions—Spotting Litigation Issues
    Menachem J. Kastner
  • Pros and Cons of Real Estate Joint Ventures for Developers and Sponsors
    Beth Pennington, David A. Hamsher
  • Real Estate Joint Ventures (PowerPoint slides)
    Beth Pennington, David A. Hamsher
  • Environmental and Land Use Issues for the Sophisticated Real Estate Practice (August 1, 2018)
    Philip E. Karmel
  • Enforceability Issues in Construction Contracts
    Daniel G. Rosenberg, Josh M. Leavitt
  • Construction Issues (PowerPoint slides)
    Daniel G. Rosenberg, Josh M. Leavitt
  • Investments and the New Tax Law, Forbes Real Estate Investor, April 2018
    Stephen M. Moskowitz
  • John T. Barry, Jeffrey B. Fugal, Edward J. Hannon, Patricia A. Hintz and Elizabeth G. Nowakowski, Tax Opportunities and Tax Traps for Real Estate Transactions, The Real Estate Finance Journal, Spring 2018
    Edward J. Hannon
  • Ethical Issues Facing Real Estate Attorneys (Substantive Article)
    Wendy J. Muchman, Mary K. Foster
  • Ethical Issues Facing Real Estate Attorneys
    Carol M. Langford, Robert S. Miller

Presentation Material

  • STATE OF THE MARKET AND PURCHASES, SALES AND CLOSING_Panel PowerPoint
    Mark McGranahan
  • MORTGAGE FINANCING_Panel PowerPoint
    Andrea L. Clay, Stephen P. Lieske, David I. Paulson
  • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION: A TOOLKIT FOR TRANSACTIONAL LAWYERS_Panel PowerPoint
    Denis F. Shanagher, Robert Charles Ward
  • JOINT VENTURES_Panel PowerPoint
    David A. Hamsher, Beth Pennington
  • ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS_Panel PowerPoint
    Nicholas W. Targ
  • CONSTRUCTION ISSUES_Panel PowerPoint
    Richard Van Duzer
  • THE IMPACT OF TAX REFORM ON COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE_Panel PowerPoint
    Stephen Moskowitz
Chairperson(s)
Richard C. Mallory ~ Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Speaker(s)
Andrea L. Clay ~ Polsinelli LLP
Jodi B. Fedor ~ Shartsis Friese LLP
Manuel Fishman ~ Buchalter
David A. Hamsher ~ Paul Hastings LLP
Danna M. Kozerski ~ Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass LLP
Carol M. Langford ~ Law Office of Carol M. Langford
Stephen P. Lieske ~ Allen Matkins Leck Gamble & Mallory LLP
Mark McGranahan ~ Cushman & Wakefield
Robert S. Miller ~ Lubin Olson & Niewiadomski LLP
Stephen Moskowitz ~ Moskowitz LLP
David I. Paulson ~ Jones Day
Beth Pennington ~ Pennington Lawson LLP
Denis F. Shanagher ~ Duane Morris LLP
Nicholas W. Targ ~ Holland & Knight LLP
Richard Van Duzer ~ Farella Braun & Martel LLP
Robert Charles Ward ~ Shartsis Friese LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Improving the skills of identifying, appreciating and weighing your client’s leverage in negotiating the commercial real estate fundamentals (rents, vacancy rates and development activity) will be the focus of the 2018 Commercial Real Estate Institute. Practitioners with this understanding will find it easier to achieve and maintain a viable real estate practice where their advice adds value. This program helps practicing attorneys enhance those abilities while performing the traditional transactional skills, and while developing workout and enforcement skills, so that they can help their clients take advantage of their leverage and regain any lost footing more quickly.

Lecture Topics [Total time 12:25:38]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • OPENING REMARKS* [00:01:52]
    Elliot L. Hurwitz
  • STATE OF THE MARKET AND PURCHASES, SALES AND CLOSING [01:48:57]
    Jonathan L. Mechanic, Ken McCarthy
  • COMMERCIAL LEASING [01:31:28]
    Jill Hayman, Ronald D. Sernau
  • MORTGAGE FINANCING [01:32:59]
    Diana M. Brummer, Kevin M. Kelly, Carson M. Leonard
  • REAL ESTATE LITIGATION: A TOOLKIT FOR TRANSACTIONAL LAWYERS [01:30:17]
    Mitchell D. Haddad, Menachem J. Kastner
  • JOINT VENTURES [01:17:38]
    Steven L. Wilner, John L. Mallinson
  • ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS [01:10:11]
    Philip E. Karmel
  • CONSTRUCTION ISSUES [01:15:32]
    Alexander Ferrini III
  • THE IMPACT OF TAX REFORM ON COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE [01:15:28]
    Stephen Millman
  • ETHICAL ISSUES FACING REAL ESTATE ATTORNEYS [01:01:16]
    Pery D. Krinsky

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Purchases, Sales and Closing (August 2018)
    Jonathan L. Mechanic
  • Purchases, Sales and Closings
    Jodi B. Fedor, Danna M. Kozerski
  • Form of Purchase and Sale Agreement
    Jodi B. Fedor, Danna M. Kozerski
  • Form of Closing Checklist—Responsibility and Status Schedule
    Danna M. Kozerski, Jodi B. Fedor
  • Purchase and Sale Agreement Checklist
    Lawrence C. Eppley, Alexandra R. Cole
  • Purchases, Sales and Closing (PowerPoint slides)
    Lawrence C. Eppley, Alexandra R. Cole
  • Manuel Fishman and Lotus Fung, Reinforcing the Basics of a Landlord Consent to Assignment of Lease BRE DDR BR Whittwood v. Farmers & Merchants Bank of Long Beach, 14 Cal. App. 5th 992 (2017)
    Manuel Fishman
  • Commercial Leases Overview
    Richard C. Mallory
  • Mezzanine Financing: The Basics (August 2018)
    Steven R. Davidson
  • Real Estate Financing Overview (July 26, 2018)
    Andrea L. Clay, Stephen P. Lieske, David I. Paulson
  • How to Make Your Real Estate Litigator Happy: A Mini-Compendium of Practical Suggestions (July 24, 2018)
    Michael A. Weinberg
  • The Real Estate Litigation Primer for the Transactional Lawyer (June 2018)
    Mitchell D. Haddad
  • Menachem J. Kastner and Ally Hack, Real Estate Transactions—Spotting Litigation Issues
    Menachem J. Kastner
  • Pros and Cons of Real Estate Joint Ventures for Developers and Sponsors
    Beth Pennington, David A. Hamsher
  • Real Estate Joint Ventures (PowerPoint slides)
    Beth Pennington, David A. Hamsher
  • Environmental and Land Use Issues for the Sophisticated Real Estate Practice (August 1, 2018)
    Philip E. Karmel
  • Enforceability Issues in Construction Contracts
    Josh M. Leavitt, Daniel G. Rosenberg
  • Construction Issues (PowerPoint slides)
    Josh M. Leavitt, Daniel G. Rosenberg
  • Investments and the New Tax Law, Forbes Real Estate Investor, April 2018
    Stephen M. Moskowitz
  • John T. Barry, Jeffrey B. Fugal, Edward J. Hannon, Patricia A. Hintz and Elizabeth G. Nowakowski, Tax Opportunities and Tax Traps for Real Estate Transactions, The Real Estate Finance Journal, Spring 2018
    Edward J. Hannon
  • Ethical Issues Facing Real Estate Attorneys (Substantive Article)
    Wendy J. Muchman, Mary K. Foster
  • Ethical Issues Facing Real Estate Attorneys
    Carol M. Langford, Robert S. Miller

Presentation Material

  • STATE OF THE MARKET AND PURCHASES, SALES AND CLOSING_PowerPoint Presentation 1
    Ken McCarthy
  • STATE OF THE MARKET AND PURCHASES, SALES AND CLOSING_PowerPoint Presentation 2
    Jonathan L. Mechanic
  • COMMERCIAL LEASING_PowerPoint Presentation
    Jill Hayman, Ronald D. Sernau
  • ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS_PowerPoint Presentation
    Philip E. Karmel
  • ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS_PowerPoint Presentation
    Alexander Ferrini III
  • THE IMPACT OF TAX REFORM ON COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE_PowerPoint Presentation
    Stephen Millman
Chairperson(s)
Elliot L. Hurwitz ~ Chief Commercial Counsel, Chicago Title Insurance Company
Speaker(s)
Diana M. Brummer ~ Goodwin Procter LLP
Alexander Ferrini III ~ Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP
Mitchell D. Haddad ~ Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Jill Hayman ~ Hunton Andrews Kurth
Philip E. Karmel ~ Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP
Menachem J. Kastner ~ Cozen O'Connor
Kevin M. Kelly ~ Senior Finance Counsel, Simon Property Group Inc.
Pery D. Krinsky ~ Krinsky PLLC
Carson M. Leonard ~ Alston & Bird LLP
John L. Mallinson ~ Managing Director, AIG Global Real Estate Investment Corp.
Ken McCarthy ~ Principal Economist, Americas Head of Applied Research, Cushman & Wakefield
Jonathan L. Mechanic ~ Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
Stephen Millman ~ Watson Farley & Williams LLP
Ronald D. Sernau ~ Proskauer Rose LLP
Steven L. Wilner ~ Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

21st Annual Commercial Real Estate Institute (New York, NY) Nov. 18 - 19, 2019
21st Annual Commercial Real Estate Institute (San Francisco, CA) Nov. 7 - 8, 2019
21st Annual Commercial Real Estate Institute (Chicago, IL) Oct. 23 - 24, 2019

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

21st Annual Commercial Real Estate Institute  
20th Annual Commercial Real Estate Institute Richard C. Mallory, Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Josh M. Leavitt, Much Shelist, P.C.
Elliot L. Hurwitz, Chicago Title Insurance Company
 
19th Annual Commercial Real Estate Institute Richard C. Mallory, Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Josh M. Leavitt, Much Shelist, P.C.
Elliot L. Hurwitz, Chicago Title Insurance Company
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2019 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2019 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.