On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Think Like a Lawyer, Talk Like a Geek 2018: Get Fluent in Technology

Released on: Oct. 11, 2018
Running Time: 06:11:45

Your clients’ needs are constantly changing, due to the rapid evolution of technology.  On any given day, one client informs you that its retail website serves customers in the U.S. and Europe and collects useful data on those customers.  Another client wants to monetize its customer data and offer it to third parties who may use it for targeted marketing.  All your clients need legal advice on regulations applicable to their data, contracts for the licensing of the data and how to protect the information from increasingly effective hackers.  Meanwhile, your clients’ businesses and the legal profession itself require you to understand technology and technical vocabulary, as well as the relevant law.  Are you ready to lead the legal discussions of the future and spot all the issues which may impact your client? The lawyer who understands his or her client’s technology and can speak that language will stand out as a trusted counselor who can analyze and provide sound advice on technology issues.  As your client’s business changes to implement new technologies, the legal issues it encounters only multiply. A lawyer now has an obligation to understand the legal issues arising from his or her client’s adoption of rapidly changing technology and to practice law using such technology.  However, without some knowledge of the nuts and bolts of the technology clients are using, a lawyer will not provide effective and useful advice.

This unique program will give lawyers the necessary background to become more knowledgeable advocates in technology-related matters.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:11:45]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:07:32]
    Peter Brown, Lori E. Lesser
  • Blockchain And the Ultimate Secure Transaction [01:01:30]
    Christopher J.P. Mitchell, Jenny Cieplak, Aaron J. Wright
  • Artificial Intelligence – The Practical and Legal Impact on Businesses [00:54:00]
    Peter Brown, Mutisya Ndunda, Stephanie E. Niehaus, Sachin Bansal
  • Big Data and Advertising – The Current Practices and Legal Issues [01:00:50]
    Marc S. Roth, Kyle Antoian, Kathleen A. McGee, Jacqueline Connor
  • Digital Entertainment [01:13:43]
    Gena A. Feist, Amir R. Ghavi, Scott J.. Sholder
  • GDPR – The Experience of Corporate Counsel after Five Months [00:58:34]
    Harry A. Valetk, Tiffany Hartkemeyer, Wendy Feldman
  • Legal Ethics in 2018: New Technologies [00:55:32]
    Lori E. Lesser, James Q. Walker

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • “Smart Contracts”: A Smart Way to Automate Performance
    Simon Leefatt, Jenny Cieplak
  • Blockchain and the Ultimate Secure Transaction
    Christopher J.P. Mitchell
  • Artificial Intelligence Law—Judicial and Regulatory Trends
    Stephanie E. Niehaus, Zachary Adams, Michael W. Kelly, Huu Nguyen
  • Artificial Intelligence in the Workplace—Legal Challenges
    Stephanie E. Niehaus, Michael W. Kelly, Huu Nguyen
  • Artificial Intelligence: Addressing the Legal Risks and Avoiding the Tort, Commercial and IP Pitfalls in Usage and Agreements
    Stephanie E. Niehaus, Huu Nguyen
  • Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion? Understanding the Issues, Federal Trade Commission Report (January 2016)
    Marc S. Roth
  • Bringing Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality to the Law (Perspective), Big Law Business (November 15, 2016)
    Dennis C. Garcia
  • Federal Trade Commission 2017 Privacy and Data Security Update (January 2017–December 2017)
  • EU General Data Protection Regulation in 13 Game Changers (March 2018)
    Harry A. Valetk
  • Ethics in a High-Tech Legal World
    Lori E. Lesser, James Q. Walker
  • Ethics in a High-Tech Legal World (Hypotheticals)
    James Q. Walker, Lori E. Lesser

Presentation Material

  • A.G. Schneiderman Announces Results of "Operation Child Tracker"
  • Big Data: A Tool for Inclusion or Exclusion?
  • Data Brokers: A Call for Transparency and Accountability
  • New York Consolidated Laws, General Business Law - GBS Section 349
  • New York Executive Law Section 63 (12)
  • The California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018
  • Blockchain and the Ultimate Secure Transaction
    Christopher J.P. Mitchell
  • Blockchain and the Ultimate Secure Transaction
    Aaron J. Wright
  • Blockchain and the Ultimate Secure Transactions
    Jenny Cieplak
  • Artificial Intelligence - The Practical and Legal Impact on Businesses
    Mutisya Ndunda
  • Artificial Intelligence - The Practical and Legal Impact on Businesses
    Stephanie E. Niehaus
  • Big Data and Advertising - The Current Practices and Legal Issues
    Kyle Antoian, Jacqueline Connor, Kathleen A. McGee, Marc S. Roth
  • Digital Entertainment
    Gena A. Feist
  • GDPR - The Experience of Corporate Counsel after Five Months
    Kelly Ann Harris, Tiffany Hartkemeyer, Harry A. Valetk
  • Hypothetical
    Lori E. Lesser, James Q. Walker
  • Legal Ethics in 2018: New Technologies
    Lori E. Lesser, James Q. Walker
Co-Chair(s)
Peter Brown ~ Peter Brown & Associates PLLC
Lori E. Lesser ~ Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
Speaker(s)
Kyle Antoian ~ VP Strategic Partnerships, Epsilon
Sachin Bansal ~ Royal Bank of Canada
Jenny Cieplak ~ Crowell & Moring LLP
Jacqueline Connor ~ Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade Commission
Gena A. Feist ~ VP/Associate General Counsel, Take Two Interactive Software Inc
Wendy Feldman ~ Prudential Ins Co of America
Amir R. Ghavi ~ Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP
Tiffany Hartkemeyer ~ European Data Privacy Leader, Mercer
Kathleen A. McGee ~ Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Christopher J.P. Mitchell ~ Law Offices of Christopher J.P. Mitchell, PLLC
Mutisya Ndunda ~ CEO, Alpha Vertex
Stephanie E. Niehaus ~ Squire Patton Boggs LLP
Marc S. Roth ~ Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Scott J.. Sholder ~ Cowan DeBaets Abrahams & Sheppard LLP
Harry A. Valetk ~ Baker McKenzie.
James Q. Walker ~ Richards Kibbe & Orbe LLP
Aaron J. Wright ~ Founder/Director, Cardozo Blockchain Project/Tech Startup Clinic, Associate Clinical Professor of Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

Think Like a Lawyer, Talk Like a Geek 2019: Get Fluent in Technology (New York, NY) Sep. 26, 2019

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Think Like a Lawyer, Talk Like a Geek 2018: Get Fluent in Technology Peter Brown, Peter Brown & Associates PLLC
Lori E. Lesser, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
 
Think Like a Lawyer, Talk Like a Geek 2017: Get Fluent in Technology Peter Brown, Peter Brown & Associates PLLC
Lori E. Lesser, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.