On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

TechLaw Institute 2018: The Digital Evolution

Released on: Mar. 12, 2018
Running Time: 09:14:55

This year’s program will provide attendees with the information they need to serve their clients in this ever-changing environment.  Attendees will learn about security issues affecting new technology; legal issues raised by the emerging “Internet of Things”, as well as by disruptive and sharing technologies.  Our speakers will share how companies can exploit all of the marketing possibilities that social media sites offer, while at the same time managing attendant risks.  Hear from industry experts how big data is driving the digital economy, and from regulators who will explain how these initiatives can threaten consumer rights and privacy.  Experts will also address ethical issues raised by new technology.

Lecture Topics [Total RunTime: 09:14:55]
Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.
  • Opening Remarks* [00:08:36]
    Marc S. Roth, James G. Snell
  • Emerging, Disruptive, and Sharing Technologies [01:01:14]
    John C. Yates
  • Current Privacy Developments [01:00:15]
    Dr. Lothar Determann, Laura D. Berger
  • The Internet of Things and the Wired Life [00:59:15]
    James G. Snell, Karen McGee, Scott Thurm
  • Emerging Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning [01:02:35]
    Dean W. Harvey
  • The Blockchain Revolution: Beyond Bitcoin [00:59:25]
    Lance Koonce, Gary Barnett
  • Evolving Legal Ethics: Portable Devices, the Cloud, and Social Media [00:59:15]
    Merri A. Baldwin, Amy L. Bomse
  • Cybersecurity, Hacking, and Data Breach [01:30:20]
    Joseph V. DeMarco, Justin Chang, Nancy Saltzman, Hugh Tower-Pierce, Edward Chang, Serena K. Lee
  • Reaching Consumers in a Digital World: Marketing, Advertising, and Social Media [01:34:00]
    Tsan Abrahamson, Marc S. Roth

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK

  • A Survey of the Emerging and Disruptive Technologies Evolving Regulations and Laws (January 5, 2018)
    John C. Yates
  • Adequacy of Data Protection in the USA: Myths and Facts, International Data Privacy Law, Vol. 6, Iss. 3 (August 2016)
    Lothar Determann
  • Lothar Determann, Brian Hengesbaugh and Michaela Weigl, The EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Versus Other EU Data Transfer Compliance Options
    Lothar Determann
  • Data Residency Rules Cutting Into Clouds: Impact and Options for Global Businesses and IT Architectures
    Lothar Determann
  • Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule, 16 C.F.R. § 312 (2013)
    Kristen Anderson, Laura D. Berger
  • Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule, 16 CFR Part 312, 78 Fed. Reg. 12 (January 17, 2013)
    Kristen Anderson, Laura D. Berger
  • Federal Trade Commission, Complying with COPPA: Frequently Asked Questions
    Kristen Anderson, Laura D. Berger
  • Federal Trade Commission, Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule: A Six-Step Compliance Plan for Your Business
    Kristen Anderson, Laura D. Berger
  • Federal Trade Commission, Staff Perspective, Businesses Can Help Stop Phishing and Protect their Brands Using Email Authentication (March 2017)
    Kristen Anderson, Laura D. Berger
  • Federal Trade Commission, Staff Report, Cross-Device Tracking (January 2017)
    Kristen Anderson, Laura D. Berger
  • James G. Snell and Christian Lee, Internet of Things: On the Cusp of a Litigation Explosion (November 7, 2017)
    James G. Snell
  • Dean W. Harvey and Michael Herrera, Emerging Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
    Dean W. Harvey
  • The Blockchain Revolution: Beyond Bitcoin (January 8, 2018)
    Lance Koonce
  • Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
    Lance Koonce
  • The Use of Cloud Computing, Mobile Devices and Social Media in the Practice of Law (January 11, 2018)
    Lucian T. Pera
  • Brief of Amici Curiae, Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association, Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, Inc., and National Sheriffs’ Association in Support of the Government, In re Apple v. FBI, No. CM 16-10-SP (C.D. Cal. 2016)
    Joseph V. DeMarco
  • U.S. v. Knowles, No. 16 Cr. 005 (PAE) (S.D.N.Y 2016)
    Joseph V. DeMarco
  • Reaching Consumers in a Digital World: Marketing, Advertising, and Social Media
    Marc S. Roth, Tsan Abrahamson
  • Federal Trade Commission, Staff Report, Blurred Lines: An Exploration of Consumers’ Advertising Recognition in the Contexts of Search Engines and Native Advertising (December 2017)
    Marc S. Roth, Tsan Abrahamson

Presentation Material


  • Emerging, Disruptive, and Sharing Technologies
    John C. Yates
  • Current Privacy Developments
    Dr. Lothar Determann
  • Current Privacy Developments (Handout)
    Dr. Lothar Determann
  • The Internet of Things and the Wired Life
    Karen McGee, James G. Snell, Scott Thurm
  • Emerging Issues in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning
    Dean W. Harvey
  • The Blockchain Revolution: Beyond Bitcoin
    Gary Barnett, Lance Koonce
  • Evolving Legal Ethics: Portable Devices, the Cloud, and Social Media
    Merri A. Baldwin, Amy L. Bomse
  • DIGITAL MARKETING & ADVERTISING 2018 EDITION the sky is not falling
    Tsan Abrahamson, Marc S. Roth
Co-Chair(s)
Marc S. Roth ~ Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
James G. Snell ~ Perkins Coie LLP
Speaker(s)
Tsan Abrahamson ~ Cobalt LLP
Merri A. Baldwin ~ Rogers Joseph O'Donnell
Gary Barnett ~ Former Deputy Director, Division of Trading and Markets, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Laura D. Berger ~ Attorney, Division of Privacy and Identity Protection, Federal Trade Commission
Amy L. Bomse ~ Arnold & Porter
Edward Chang ~ 2VP Cyber Risk Management, Bond & Specialty Insurance, Travelers
Justin Chang ~ Digital Realty Trust, L.P.
Joseph V. DeMarco ~ DeVore & DeMarco LLP
Dr. Lothar Determann ~ Baker & McKenzie LLP
Dean W. Harvey ~ Perkins Coie LLP
Lance Koonce ~ Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Serena K. Lee ~ Vice President, American Arbitration Association
Karen McGee ~ Group Counsel, Privacy and Security Legal , Intel Corporation
Nancy Saltzman ~ Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer, EXL
Scott Thurm ~ Business Editor, WIRED
Hugh Tower-Pierce ~ Two Sigma Investments LP
John C. Yates ~ Morris, Manning & Martin, LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Related Items

Live Programs  Live Programs

TechLaw Institute 2019: The Digital Evolution (New York, NY) Mar. 27 - 28, 2019
TechLaw Institute 2019: The Digital Evolution (San Francisco, CA) Mar. 4 - 5, 2019

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

TechLaw Institute 2019: The Digital Evolution James G. Snell, Perkins Coie LLP
Philip Blum, Broadcom Inc.
Marc S. Roth, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
 
TechLaw Institute 2018: The Digital Evolution James G. Snell, Perkins Coie LLP
Philip Blum, CA Technologies
Marc S. Roth, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
 
Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2019 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2019 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.