On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Health Care Technology 2017: Critical Issues in Cybercare, Digital Medicine, and Structuring Effective Agreements

Released on: Jun. 20, 2017
Running Time: 05:55:30

IT and Health Care are rapidly converging as a result of fast-paced innovation in health-focused information technology  and new regulatory and operational requirements faced by health care providers that are met by these innovations.   This requires institutions, IT companies and the lawyers who advise them, and investors to reevaluate and revise existing agreements, address intellectual property issues, and formulate new forms of agreements for new technology -- including remote, retail, personalized and assisted living health care.  Challenges posed by data security and cyber-attacks and privacy aspects of data sharing must be enhanced at the same time that data analytics,  mobile and cloud computing  are being used to improve patient outcomes, drug development and other aspects of the health care ecosystem.   This conference brings together legal experts from key legal areas to provide practical guidance so that lawyers can create value in advising clients on in health care IT legal fields.

You will learn:

  • An overview of HIPAA, HITECH, ACA and how the new legislation impacts the implementation of IT applications in Health Care
  • Best-of-Breed approaches to implementing health care IT and the legal implications that come with them.
  • Tips for advising client organizations as they consider and implement IT resources
  • A look at the future of IT in the health care industry

Attorneys representing health care organizations and life science companies or in-house counsel at health care organizations and life science companies will benefit from learning about the best practices for implementing healthcare IT.

Lecture Topics [Total time 05:55:30]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Welcome, Introductions and Overview* [00:03:31]
  • Negotiating Health Care IT Agreements [01:06:25]
    Diana McKenzie
  • Ransomware and Cyberattacks in the Health Care Industry [01:28:36]
    Amy S. Leopard
  • Health Care Institutions’ Role in Developing Emerging Technologies: Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, and New Interfaces [01:03:53]
    Wen Dombrowski, Nardo Manaloto, William A. Tanenbaum
  • Making Innovation Agreements Between Hospital and Technology Companies Work [01:12:47]
    William A. Tanenbaum, Steve Berman
  • Clinical Engineering in Health Care [01:00:18]
    Forest Blanton, Douglas A Grimm

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:


  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Negotiating Health Care IT Agreements (PowerPoint slides)
    Diana J.P. McKenzie
  • Licensor and Licensee Dealmaking Tips to Reduce Data Privacy and Security Risks
    Diana J.P. McKenzie
  • Joint Developments Raise Intellectual Property Concerns
    William A. Tanenbaum
  • Strategic Perspectives: Risks in Health Care IT Agreements and Recommendations to Avoid Them (May 16, 2016)
    William A. Tanenbaum
  • The “Internet of Things” Should Be the “Security of Things”
    William A. Tanenbaum
  • How Health Care Institutions Can Improve Data Security
    William A. Tanenbaum
  • Health Breach Notification Rule, 16 CFR 318
  • Three Critical IT Risks to Avoid in Mergers
    William A. Tanenbaum
  • Data Breach Webinar Series: Hot Topics in Healthcare (September 21, 2016)
    Travis Lloyd, Jordan Stivers, Amy S. Leopard
  • Start with Security: A Guide for Business (June 2015)
  • Your Money or Your Guests: Using IT Contracts to Protect Against Ransomware (February 7, 2017)
    Kimberly Wachen, William A. Tanenbaum
  • General Wellness: Policy for Low Risk Devices, Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (July 29, 2016)
  • Mobile Medical Applications: Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (February 9, 2015)
  • AMA Adopts Ethical Guidelines for Telemedicine, Finally
    Douglas A. Grimm, Annie Chang Lee
  • Addressing Legal Risks in Health Care IT Contracts
    Randall Stempler, William A. Tanenbaum

Presentation Material


  • Supplemental Materials
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Supplemental Materials
  • Negotiating Health Care IT Agreements
    Diana McKenzie
  • Ransomware and Cyberattacks in the Health Care Industry
    Amy S. Leopard
  • Ransomware and Cyberattacks in the Health Care Industry
    Amy S. Leopard
  • Health Care Institutions' Role in Developing Emerging Technologies: Artifical Intelligence, Internet of Things, and New Interfaces
    Wen Dombrowski, Nardo Manaloto, William A. Tanenbaum
  • Making Innovation Agreements Between Hospital and Technology Companies Work
    Steve Berman
  • Making Innovation Agreements Between Hospital and Technology Companies Work
    William A. Tanenbaum
  • Clinical Engineering in Health Care
    Forest Blanton, Douglas A Grimm
Chairperson(s)
William A. Tanenbaum ~ Polsinelli
Speaker(s)
Steve Berman ~ Montefiore Health System
Forest Blanton ~ Memorial Healthcare System
Wen Dombrowski ~ Catalaize
Douglas A. Grimm ~ Arent Fox LLP
Amy S. Leopard ~ Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Nardo Manaloto ~ Catalaize
Diana J.P. McKenzie ~ Information Technology & Outsourcing Practice Group, HunterMaclean
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 3 on-demand credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “A/V” credit. Attorneys are limited to 22.5 credits of A/V programs per reporting period.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as “QAS Self-Study” credit. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Share
Email
"Great presentation content and very useful practical practice examples." - 2016 Attendee

"Very impressive panelists/presentations, and particularly useful in terms of practical and actionable advice.  Well done." – 2016 Attendee


  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.