On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Cybersecurity 2018: Managing Cybersecurity Incidents

Select a Location:

Cyber attacks have wreaked havoc on organizations in every industry sector.  Senior management and boards of directors alike rank this issue to be of the highest concern – and for good reason.  From the consumer reporting agencies to technology companies to financial services organizations, cyber criminals have made it clear that no entity is immune.  In today’s interconnected world, cybercrime targets go beyond those that maintain personal information; many entities have been targets due to the business proprietary information they hold.  Media reports of the staggering number of increasingly sophisticated cyber attacks attest to an upward trend in cybercrime, and the events of the last few years have dwarfed earlier hacking incidents. 

There has been significant activity by the U.S. government to take measures designed to prevent or mitigate cybersecurity events.  The European Union also has taken significant action to respond to the serious threat posed by cyber criminals. China has also been active in this arena.

To keep up with the rapidly evolving legal landscape in this field, companies need to be informed not only about the risks they face, but also about policy pronouncements and legislation that could affect how they do business.  A thorough understanding of this area is particularly important for companies that have not previously been in cyber attackers’ crosshairs and need to consider strategies to confront these sophisticated and persistent threats.

The multiple challenges posed by cybersecurity issues demand an interdisciplinary approach.  Please join us for a robust discussion of the future of cybersecurity with leading experts in the field including law enforcement authorities, Chief Information Security Officers, cybersecurity lawyers and forensic experts.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:34:00]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:09:12]
    Lisa J. Sotto
  • The Cyber Threat Landscape [01:02:20]
    Eric M. Friedberg, Aristedes Mahairas
  • Cybersecurity: U.S. and Global Legal Landscape [01:00:05]
    William Min, Tracey E. Scraba
  • Cyber Attack Simulation [01:19:17]
    Stephen T. Gannon, Lisa J. Sotto, Gerasimos J. Stellatos
  • Managing the Risk: Cybersecurity Insurance and Risk to the Board [01:01:51]
    Walter J. Andrews, Alan Charles Raul
  • Cybersecurity: A Hacker's Perspective [00:58:23]
    Christie Terrill, Jay Kelath
  • Cybersecurity: Regulators and CISOs Speak [01:02:52]
    Adam Fletcher, Bob Lord, Ben Rossen

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Lisa J. Sotto and Ryan P. Logan, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, How to Safeguard Privacy and Data Security in Corporate Transactions (February 22, 2016)
    Lisa J. Sotto
  • Manufacturers Must Focus On Securing The Internet Of Things
    Aristedes Mahairas
  • Gerben Kleijn, Bishop Fox, AWS S3 Buckets Security (July 2018)
    Christie Terrill
  • Judith Branham and Chad Pinson, Stroz Friedberg, an Aon Company, Lawyers and Advisors: It’s Time for You to Strengthen Your Cybersecurity Defenses
    Bryan Hurd
  • Stroz Friedberg, an Aon Company, Achieving Cyber Resilience > Overview
    Bryan Hurd
  • Stroz Friedberg, an Aon Company, Cybersecurity in Higher Education: The Urgent Need to Mitigate Risk
    Bryan Hurd
  • PwC, Strengthening Digital Society Against Cyber Shocks
    Emily Stapf
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Privacy & Information Security Law Blog Posts
    Lisa J. Sotto
  • PwC, Revitalizing Privacy and Trust in a Data-Driven World
    Emily Stapf
  • Lisa J. Sotto and Aaron P. Simpson, A How-To Guide to Information Security Breaches, BNA, Inc., Privacy & Security Law Report (April 2, 2007)
    Lisa J. Sotto
  • MJ Keith, Bishop Fox, A Primer to Red Teaming (July 2018)
    Christie Terrill
  • Cybersecurity Governance: Questions Boards Should Ask Before It’s Too Late … and GCs Should Be Prepared to Answer (June 2018)
    Alan Charles Raul
  • Walter J. Andrews and Cary Steklof, The Insurance Industry’s Uncharted Waters: The Keys to Procuring Cyber Insurance and Reporting Claims (June 8, 2018)
    Walter J. Andrews
  • Stroz Friedberg, an Aon Company, 2018 Cybersecurity Predictions: A Shift to Managing Cyber as an Enterprise Risk (January 2018)
    Bryan Hurd
  • Alex DeFreese, Bishop Fox, How ‘Small’ Security Errors Lead to a Security Breach (July 2018)
    Christie Terrill
  • Lisa J. Sotto, Brittany M. Bacon and Jeffrey Dunifon, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Ransomware Attacks Raise Key Legal Considerations (June 27, 2017)
    Lisa J. Sotto
  • Complaint, FTC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
    Ben Rossen
  • Decision and Order, FTC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
    Ben Rossen
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, SEC Publishes New Guidance on Public Company Cybersecurity Disclosure (February 2018)
    Lisa J. Sotto

Presentation Material

  • Cybersecurity Attack Simulation
    Stephen T. Gannon, Lisa J. Sotto, Gerasimos J. Stellatos
  • Cybersecurity and Data Protection: Questions to Ask Before It’s Too Late
    Alan Charles Raul
  • Managing the Risk: Cybersecurity Insurance and Risk to the Board
    Walter J. Andrews
  • Cybersecurity: A Hacker's Perspective
    Jay Kelath, Christie Terrill
Chairperson(s)
Lisa J. Sotto ~ Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Speaker(s)
Walter J. Andrews ~ Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Adam Fletcher ~ Chief Information Security Officer, Blackstone
Eric M. Friedberg ~ Co-President, Stroz Friedberg, an Aon company
Stephen T. Gannon ~ EVP and General Counsel, Citizens Financial Group
Jay Kelath ~ Head of Product Security, Dow Jones & Company
Bob Lord ~ Chief Security Officer, Democratic National Committee
Aristedes Mahairas ~ Special Agent in Charge, Special Operations/Cyber Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation
William Min ~ Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy and Data Governance Officer, The Western Union Company
Alan Charles Raul ~ Sidley Austin LLP
Ben Rossen ~ Attorney, Division of Privacy & Identity Protection, Federal Trade Commission
Tracey E. Scraba ~ Vice President, Chief Privacy Officer, Aetna Inc
Gerasimos J. Stellatos ~ Principal, PwC
Christie Terrill ~ Bishop Fox
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Cyber attacks have wreaked havoc on organizations in every industry sector.  Senior management and boards of directors alike rank this issue to be of the highest concern – and for good reason.  From the consumer reporting agencies to technology companies to financial services organizations, cyber criminals have made it clear that no entity is immune.  In today’s interconnected world, cybercrime targets go beyond those that maintain personal information; many entities have been targets due to the business proprietary information they hold.  Media reports of the staggering number of increasingly sophisticated cyber attacks attest to an upward trend in cybercrime, and the events of the last few years have dwarfed earlier hacking incidents. 

There has been significant activity by the U.S. government to take measures designed to prevent or mitigate cybersecurity events.  The European Union also has taken significant action to respond to the serious threat posed by cyber criminals. China has also been active in this arena.

To keep up with the rapidly evolving legal landscape in this field, companies need to be informed not only about the risks they face, but also about policy pronouncements and legislation that could affect how they do business.  A thorough understanding of this area is particularly important for companies that have not previously been in cyber attackers’ crosshairs and need to consider strategies to confront these sophisticated and persistent threats.

The multiple challenges posed by cybersecurity issues demand an interdisciplinary approach.  Please join us for a robust discussion of the future of cybersecurity with leading experts in the field including law enforcement authorities, Chief Information Security Officers, cybersecurity lawyers and forensic experts.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:32:45]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks* [00:09:15]
    Lisa J. Sotto
  • The Cyber Threat Landscape [01:02:05]
    Bryan Hurd, Aristedes Mahairas
  • Cybersecurity: U.S. and Global Legal Landscape [00:59:20]
    William Min, Ryan Vinelli
  • Cyber Attack Simulation [01:18:25]
    Lisa J. Sotto, Emily Stapf
  • Managing the Risk: Cybersecurity Insurance and Risk to the Board [00:59:15]
    Walter J. Andrews, Alan Charles Raul
  • Cybersecurity: A Hacker's Perspective [01:01:30]
    Vincent Liu, Robert Ragan
  • Cybersecurity: Regulators and CISOs Speak [01:02:55]
    Patrick Heim, Jared Ho, Daniel Chiang

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Lisa J. Sotto and Ryan P. Logan, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, How to Safeguard Privacy and Data Security in Corporate Transactions (February 22, 2016)
    Lisa J. Sotto
  • Manufacturers Must Focus On Securing The Internet Of Things
    Aristedes Mahairas
  • Gerben Kleijn, Bishop Fox, AWS S3 Buckets Security (July 2018)
    Christie Terrill
  • Judith Branham and Chad Pinson, Stroz Friedberg, an Aon Company, Lawyers and Advisors: It’s Time for You to Strengthen Your Cybersecurity Defenses
    Bryan Hurd
  • Stroz Friedberg, an Aon Company, Achieving Cyber Resilience > Overview
    Bryan Hurd
  • Stroz Friedberg, an Aon Company, Cybersecurity in Higher Education: The Urgent Need to Mitigate Risk
    Bryan Hurd
  • PwC, Strengthening Digital Society Against Cyber Shocks
    Emily Stapf
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Privacy & Information Security Law Blog Posts
    Lisa J. Sotto
  • PwC, Revitalizing Privacy and Trust in a Data-Driven World
    Emily Stapf
  • Lisa J. Sotto and Aaron P. Simpson, A How-To Guide to Information Security Breaches, BNA, Inc., Privacy & Security Law Report (April 2, 2007)
    Lisa J. Sotto
  • MJ Keith, Bishop Fox, A Primer to Red Teaming (July 2018)
    Christie Terrill
  • Cybersecurity Governance: Questions Boards Should Ask Before It’s Too Late … and GCs Should Be Prepared to Answer (June 2018)
    Alan Charles Raul
  • Walter J. Andrews and Cary Steklof, The Insurance Industry’s Uncharted Waters: The Keys to Procuring Cyber Insurance and Reporting Claims (June 8, 2018)
    Walter J. Andrews
  • Stroz Friedberg, an Aon Company, 2018 Cybersecurity Predictions: A Shift to Managing Cyber as an Enterprise Risk (January 2018)
    Bryan Hurd
  • Alex DeFreese, Bishop Fox, How ‘Small’ Security Errors Lead to a Security Breach (July 2018)
    Christie Terrill
  • Lisa J. Sotto, Brittany M. Bacon and Jeffrey Dunifon, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Ransomware Attacks Raise Key Legal Considerations (June 27, 2017)
    Lisa J. Sotto
  • Complaint, FTC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
    Ben Rossen
  • Decision and Order, FTC v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
    Ben Rossen
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, SEC Publishes New Guidance on Public Company Cybersecurity Disclosure (February 2018)
    Lisa J. Sotto

Presentation Material

  • Cyber Attack Simulation
    Lisa J. Sotto, Emily Stapf
  • Cybersecurity and Data Protection: Questions to Ask Before It's Too Late...
    Alan Charles Raul
  • Managing the Risk: Cybersecurity Insurance and Risk to the Board
    Walter J. Andrews
  • Evolving Adversary Simulation
    Vincent Liu, Robert Ragan
Chairperson(s)
Lisa J. Sotto ~ Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Speaker(s)
Walter J. Andrews ~ Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
Daniel Chiang ~ Former Director, Security Risk, Oath
Patrick Heim ~ Operating Partner & CISO, ClearSky Security
Jared Ho ~ Senior Attorney, Division of Privacy and Identity Protection, Federal Trade Commission
Bryan Hurd ~ Vice President, Stroz Friedberg, an Aon Company
Vincent Liu ~ Bishop Fox
Aristedes Mahairas ~ Special Agent in Charge, Special Operations/Cyber Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation
William Min ~ Deputy General Counsel & Chief Privacy and Data Governance Officer, The Western Union Company
Robert Ragan ~ Bishop Fox
Alan Charles Raul ~ Sidley Austin LLP
Emily Stapf ~ Partner, Cybersecurity, PwC
Ryan Vinelli ~ Global Cybersecurity Counsel, Oath
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 9 credits of distance education per reporting period. Effective January 1, 2019, the limit of distance education per reporting period will increase from 9 to 18 credits.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “prerecorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of prerecorded programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  All PLI products can fulfill New Hampshire’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  All PLI products can fulfill Puerto Rico’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “video replay” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 video replay credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  All PLI products can fulfill Washington’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Australia (CPD-AUS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Australia’s CPD requirements. Credit limits for on-demand web programs vary according to jurisdiction. Please refer to your jurisdiction’s CPD information page for specifics.

Alberta (CPD-ALBERTA):  All PLI products can fulfill Alberta’s CPD requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Dubai (CLPD-DUBAI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill CLPD credit requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as the “QAS Self-Study” delivery method. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at plicredits@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at plicredits@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

SHRM Recertification (SHRM):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as "self-paced" credit. SHRM professionals are limited to 30 credits of self-paced programs per recertification period.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists Certification (CAMS):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CAMS credit.

New York State Social Worker Continuing Education (SW CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for SW CPE credit.

American Bankers Association Professional Certification (ABA):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill ABA credit requirements.

Certified Financial Planners (CFP):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CFP credit.

 

Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2018 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2018 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.