Seminar  Seminar

Patent Law Institute (7th Annual)


Why you should attend

The Institute is designed to be of ultimate practice value to all three subgroups in the patent law community: patent prosecutors, patent litigators, and strategic/transactional lawyers. The two-day schedule includes seven plenary sessions of interest to all patent lawyers and five breakout sessions in each of the three subgroups.

You design the two-day schedule that best meets your professional needs.

Do not miss this unique opportunity to sharpen your practice skills and network with federal judges, USPTO officials, in-house counsel and outside patent lawyers.

What you will learn

Plenary sessions include:

  • Keynote Address by Hon. Margaret A. (Peggy) Focarino, Commissioner of Patents
  • A dialogue with prominent members of the bench and bar, including former Federal Circuit Chief Judge Paul R. Michel
  • Key buyers, sellers and brokers of patent assets divulge inner workings of the patent marketplace
  • U.S. District Court judges provide insight on patent law and litigation
  • The practice impact of the America Invents Act, and recent Supreme Court and Federal Circuit decisions
  • Corporate counsel discuss critical issues that keep them awake at night

Plus customize your Institute by choosing from 15 breakout sessions!

Prosecution Breakout Track:  three sessions focused on the avalanche of USPTO rules implementing the America Invents Act (AIA) and other important PTO actions; and two sessions focused on the AIA and chemical and biotechnical patent prosecution. This year, and until further notice, the USPTO is all about AIA implementation. You can expect many on-the-fly adjustments as to AIA implementation, so this is your chance to be current across the board.

Litigation Breakout Track: containing patent litigation costs; developments in pharma and biotech patent litigation; advice from the bench; litigating against non-practicing entities; and developments in patent damages.

Strategic/Transactional Breakout Track: hear about key issues concerning patent standards and “essential patents”; patent-eligible subject matter in view of Prometheus and its progeny; joint infringement from attorneys involved in Akamai and other key decisions; and hot tech transfer topics affecting your practice.

Special Features

  • Patent system perspectives from industry and a District Court judge
  • Earn one hour of Ethics credit!

Who should attend

Patent litigators, patent prosecutors and patent transactional lawyers, both in-house and outside counsel, should not miss PLI’s Patent Law Institute. In just two days, you will hear all of the recent developments you need to know and learn how to adjust your practice to the new environment.

Day One:  9:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.

Morning Session:  9:00 a.m. - 12:30 p.m.

(Plenary Sessions)

9:00  Program Overview

Scott M. Alter, Douglas R. Nemec, John M. White

9:15  PTO Update

  • Implementing the AIA
  • Expectations

Brian Hanlon

10:15  Recent Cases

  • Prometheus
  • Caraco
  • Myriad
  • Akamai/McKesson
  • The latest patent cases bound for the Supreme Court
  • Other decisions of consequence from the Federal Circuit

Denise De Mory

11:15  Networking Break

11:30
(Breakout Tracks)

Breakout: Litigation*

Managing Patent Litigation: Containing Costs and Maintaining Efficiency

  • Tips on efficient management of outside counsel
  • Alternative fee arrangements
  • Best practices with litigation vendors and consultants
  • Avoiding e-discovery nightmares

Cynthia Bright

Breakout: Prosecution

Implementing the AIA Pre & Post-Grant, Part I: Derivation Proceedings, Third-Party Submissions; Supplemental Examination

  • The PTO as post-grant arbiter of validity
  • Derivation – the interference remnant of old 35 USC 102(f)
  • Third-party action before and after issue: more latitude
  • The “cleansing” effect of Supplemental Examination

Brian Hanlon, Robert J. Spar, John M. White

Breakout: Strategic & Transactional

Standards and Essential Patents

  • Antitrust considerations concerning “essential patents” and FRAND issues
  • Effectiveness of current standards setting and associated patent licensing systems
  • Recent cases and issues

Matthew J. Bye, Frances E. Marshall

12:30  Lunch Break

Afternoon Session:  1:45 p.m. - 5:30 p.m.

1:45

(Breakout Tracks Continued)

Breakout: Litigation*

Patent Damages – Keeping Up With the Changing Rules

  • Perspectives on the sea change in damages analysis
  • Constructing – or deconstructing – a reasonable royalty case
  • Proving lost profits, price erosion, and other "but for" damages
  • Getting the most from your damages/economic expert

Dawn Hall, Kimberly N. Van Voorhis

Breakout: Prosecution

Implementing the AIA Post Grant, Part II: The "Windows" Post-Grant Review; Inter Partes Review

  • Avoiding litigation or pre-empting litigation
  • The instant dispute resolved at the PTO: Post-Grant Review
  • The “after-the-fact” remedy of Inter Partes Review

Brian Hanlon, Robert J. Spar, John M. White

Breakout: Strategic & Transactional

Navigating The New Induced Infringement: Tips and Practical Considerations

  • Willful blindness considerations after Global-Tech v. SEB
  • Effect of Bard v. Gore on practical willful infringement considerations
  • Are opinions of counsel still important?

Scott M. Alter

2:45

Breakout: Litigation*

Developments in Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation

  • AIA one year and counting – has it impacted pharma and biotech litigation?
  • The continuing drama around reverse payment pharma settlements
  • The evolving FDA guidance and rules for follow-on biologics
  • The role of Section 101 challenges in pharma and biotech litigation

Asim Bhansali

Breakout: Prosecution

Implementing the AIA: First to File: The New 102 Timelines and Deadlines!

  • First to do what…exactly: file or publish?
  • When a grace period is not really a grace period
  • The novelty exceptions to prior art; or how to extend your term

Nicholas Godici, Leonard Richard Svensson

Breakout: Strategic & Transactional

Patent-Eligible Subject Matter: Implications for the Biotech, Medical Device and Software Industries

  • Long and short-term effects of the Supreme Court’s Mayo v. Prometheus and Bilski v. Kappos decisions
  • Drafting strategic applications in an uncertain world
  • Impact of recent Federal Circuit and district court decisions

Roberta Jean Hanson, Robert R. Sachs

3:45  Networking Break

4:00  Dialogue Between the Bench and the Bar

  • A frank discussion between the former Chief Judge of the Federal Circuit and leading members of the bench and patent appellate bar on hot patent topics affecting your practice

A video of the NYC presentation

5:30  Adjourn

Day Two:  9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.

Morning Session:  9:00 a.m. - 12:15 p.m
.

9:00
(Breakout Tracks)

Breakout: Litigation*

Litigation Advice From the Bench
  • A rare opportunity for an interactive discussion with a sitting Federal judge
  • Tried and tested approaches to containing e-discovery
  • What kinds of evidence really matter – how to avoid rabbit holes
  • Advice on effective advocacy in complex cases

Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley

Breakout: Prosecution

Chemical/Pharma Cases and AIA Concerns
  • Staying with PTO practice in light of CAFC and Supreme Court decisions
  • KSR still evolving in Chem/Pharma
  • Taking advantage of new 102 Novelty exceptions

Margaret M. Dunbar, Leonard Richard Svensson

Breakout: Strategic & Transactional

Joint Infringement post Akamai/McKesson

  • The new case law
  • Open questions
  • Practical consequences for drafting claims and structuring one's conduct

Daryl L. Joseffer, Alison M. Tucher

10:00

Breakout: Prosecution

Bio Cases and AIA Concerns

  • Staying with PTO practice post Myriad, Prometheus, and Classen
  • New approaches to protection
  • Taking advantage of new 102 Novelty exceptions

Margaret M. Dunbar, Leonard Richard Svensson

Breakout: Strategic & Transactional*

Hot Topics in Technology Transfer and Licensing

  • University tech transfer issues
  • Performance, royalty and other provisions

Cheryl A. Fragiadakis, Nader A. Mousavi

11:00  Networking Break

11:15  Litigating Against Non-Practicing Entities

  • What is different about litigating against an NPE and why does it matter?
  • Proven strategies for defeating NPEs
  • Special considerations regarding remedies
  • Dealing with joint defense groups

Philip W. Marsh, Andrew N. Thomases

12:15  Lunch Break

Afternoon Session:  1:45 p.m. - 5:00 p.m.

1:45  Plenary: Patent Markets

  • Established and evolving IP monetization models
  • Effects of changing legal and economic environments

Kevin Barhydt, David Kaefer, James Kovacs, Ken Lustig

2:45  Corporate Counsel Panel

  • Effects of court decisions and USPTO activity
  • Concerns regarding newly enacted legislation
  • The economy . . .
  • Other patent issues weighing on the minds of corporate counsel

T.J. Angioletti, Joseph T. FitzGerald, Heath Hoglund, Allen M. Lo, Steven A. McAuley

3:45  Networking Break

4:00  PTO Ethics and the AIA

  • Statute of limitations tolling under the AIA and PTO rules
  • The new ethical reality of first-to-file
    - Mistakes may be catastrophic; malpractice issues
    - Streamline client intake; setting expectations
    - Informed consent early and often
    - "Best practices" advice; new “grace” period
    - OED decisions and investigations; defining trouble
Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.

5:00  Adjourn

*  Live Webcast of breakout session
Co-Chair(s)
Scott M. Alter ~ Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Douglas R. Nemec ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
John M. White ~ Berenato & White, LLC; Director of Patent Professional Development, PLI,
Speaker(s)
T.J. Angioletti ~ Associate General Counsel, Technology & Transactions, Netflix
Kevin Barhydt ~ VP, Head of Acquisitions and Analysis, RPX Corporation
Asim Bhansali ~ Keker & Van Nest LLP
Cynthia Bright ~ IP Litigation Counsel, Hewlett Packard Co
Matthew J. Bye ~ Senior Competition Counsel, Google Inc.
Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley ~ Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California
Donald R. Dunner ~ Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Joseph T. FitzGerald ~ Senior Vice President of Public and Legal Affairs, Symantec Corporation
Cheryl A. Fragiadakis ~ Technology Transfer Department Head, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Nicholas Godici ~ Executive Advisor, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP
Dawn Hall ~ Managing Director - Forensic Consulting, FTI Consulting
Brian Hanlon ~ Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office
Roberta Jean Hanson ~ Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Heath Hoglund ~ Chief Patent Counsel, Dolby
Daryl L. Joseffer ~ King & Spalding LLP
David Kaefer ~ General Manager, IP Licensing & Sales, Microsoft Corp
James A. Kovacs ~ , Deputy Director of Intel Licensing and Patent Acquisitions, Intel Corporation
Allen M. Lo ~ Deputy General Counsel, Google, Inc.
Ken Lustig ~ Vice President, Strategic Acquisitions, Divestitures and Client Engagement, Intellectual Ventures Management LLC
Philip W. Marsh ~ Agility IP Law
Frances E. Marshall ~ Special Counsel for Intellectual Property, Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice
Steven A. McAuley ~ Vice President & Chief Patent Counsel, CRV, Boston Scientific Corporation
Denise M. De Mory ~ Bunsow De Mory Smith & Allison LLP
Nader A. Mousavi ~ Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Margaret M. Dunbar, M.S. ~ Senior Director, Intellectual Property and Legal Affairs, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute
Carter G. Phillips ~ Sidley Austin LLP
Eugene R. Quinn, Jr. ~ President and Founder, IPWatchdog.com, IPWatchdog, Inc.
Robert R. Sachs ~ Fenwick & West LLP
Hon. Patti B. Saris ~ District Judge, United States District Court, District of Massachusetts
Robert J. Spar ~ Patent Prosecution and Practice Specialist, Director (Ret.) OPLA, USPTO,
Leonard Richard Svensson ~ Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP
Andrew N. Thomases ~ Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
Alison M. Tucher ~ Morrison & Foerster LLP
Kimberly N. Van Voorhis ~ Morrison & Foerster LLP
John M. Whealan ~ Intellectual Property Advisory Board Associate Dean for Intellectual Property Law Studies, George Washington University Law School
Program Attorney(s)
John M. Mola ~ Director of California Operations, Practising Law Institute

San Francisco Seminar Location

PLI California Center, 685 Market Street, San Francisco, California 94105. (415) 498-2800.

San Francisco Hotel Accommodations

The Palace Hotel, 2 New Montgomery Street, San Francisco, California 94105. Call (800) 917-7456 seven days a week from 6:00 am to 12:00 am (PDT) and mention you are attending this program at Practising Law Institute to receive the preferred rate. For online reservations, go to www.sfpalace.com/pli to receive the preferred rate.

Due to high demand we recommend reserving hotel rooms as early as possible.

PLI programs qualify for credit in all states that require mandatory continuing legal education for attorneys. Please be sure to check with your state and the credit calculator to the right for details.


Please check the CLE Calculator above each product description for CLE information specific to your state.

Special Note: In New York, newly admitted attorneys may receive CLE credit only for attendance at "transitional" programs during their first two years of admission to the Bar. Non-traditional course formats such as on-demand web programs or recorded items, are not acceptable for CLE credit. Experienced attorneys may choose to attend and receive CLE credit for either a transitional course or for one geared to experienced attorneys.  All product types, including on-demand web programs and recorded items, are approved for experienced attorneys.

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.

Credit will be granted only to the individual on record as the purchaser unless alternative arrangements (prearranged groupcast) are made in advance.

Related Items

Live Seminars  Live Seminars

Patent Litigation 2013 (New York, NY) Nov. 11 - 12, 2013
Patent Litigation 2013 (Chicago, IL) Oct. 9 - 10, 2013

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2013 Jun. 19, 2013
Patent Litigation 2012 Oct. 12, 2012

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Patent Litigation 2013  
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2013 Ian N. Feinberg, Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP
Gary M. Hnath, Mayer Brown LLP
 
Patent Law Institute (7th Annual) Scott M. Alter, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Douglas R. Nemec, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
John M. White,
 
Patent Litigation 2012 Christopher K. Hu, Dickstein Shapiro LLP
Jeanne M. Gills, Foley & Lardner LLP
Edward G. Poplawski, Sidley Austin LLP
 
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012 Ian N. Feinberg, Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP
Gary M. Hnath, Mayer Brown LLP
 
Patent Law Institute (6th Annual) Scott M. Alter, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Douglas R. Nemec, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
John M. White,
 
Item# 41878
Location:  San Francisco, CA
We are sorry, but this program is no longer available for purchase online. For more information please call our Customer Service Department at (800) 260-4PLI.

Seminar attendance includes course handbook and associated course materials. A downloadable course handbook will also be available several days prior to the program start for your review.