TreatiseTreatise

Legal Opinions in Business Transactions (2nd Edition)

 by Arthur Field, Jeffrey Smith
 
 Copyright: 2006

 Product Details >> 

Product Details

  • ISBN Number: 140240770X
  • Page Count: 640
  • Number of Volumes: 1
  •  
  • The purchase of PLI titles may include Basic Upkeep Service, whereby
    supplements, replacement pages and new editions may be shipped
    to you immediately upon publication for a 30-day examination. This
    service is cancelable at any time.

”Finally, an easy-to-read treatise on the basic tenets of legal opinions in business transactions.”
—Joseph Halliday, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York City

”Easy-to-find material relevant to your questions and an easy-to-read style.”
—Mike Sigal, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett


Featuring model sample opinions, PLI’s Legal Opinions in Business Transactions provides the knowledge, tools, and experienced counsel that enable you to craft rock-solid third-party opinion letters more easily and economically.

Referring to effective opinion guidelines developed through custom and approved by the TriBar Opinion Committee and the ABA, this practical, plain-English resource helps you master the opinion process by giving you a thorough understanding of the rights, obligations, and expectations of opinion givers, preparers, and recipients; the purpose, initiation, structure, terms, review, timing, delivery, and updating of third-party opinion letters, including how the law, facts, documents, exceptions, and assumptions are integrated; the function and components of interrelated and supporting opinions that combine to create opinion letters; and potential liabilities triggered by flaws in opinion letters, including pitfalls for opinion givers, preparers, and recipients.

Included is a new chapter for inexperienced attorneys, which provides a succinct overview of the principles, players, and procedures involved in creating opinion letters.

Updated annually or as needed, Legal Opinions in Business Transactions is an important working tool for every attorney who works with legal opinions.

Chapter 1: Third-Party Closing Opinions; Duties and Roles
  • § 1:1 : “Opinions” and “Opinion Letters”; “Opinion Givers”—“Opinion Recipients”; “Opinion Preparers”; “Opinion Request”—“Opinion Requirement”1-2
    • § 1:1.1 : Required Expertise1-2
    • § 1:1.2 : Scope1-3
    • § 1:1.3 : Overview of Significant Terminology1-3
    • § 1:1.4 : Opinion Preparer Concept1-5
  • § 1:2 : Closing Opinion Rationale: One Aspect of Business Due Diligence1-6
  • § 1:3 : Closing Opinion Needs Are Primarily a Business Question1-6
  • § 1:4 : Closing Opinion; the Opinion Letter As a Condition of Closing: “Agreement” Versus “Undertaking”1-8
  • § 1:5 : The Closing Opinion As the Only Available Advice on Effectiveness in a Dispute-Oriented Legal System1-10
  • § 1:6 : Client Is in Full Control of Closing Opinion Delivery to Third Party but Does Not Control Content of Closing Opinion1-11
  • § 1:7 : Closing Opinion Acceptability1-12
    • § 1:7.1 : The Two Faces of Closing Opinion Acceptability1-12
    • § 1:7.2 : Acceptability of the Opinion Giver1-13
    • § 1:7.3 : Acceptability of Opinion Letter Content: Opinion Limitations1-14
  • § 1:8 : Duty to a Third Party—The Recipient’s Right to Rely on Closing Opinions; Does Reliance Require That a Closing Opinion Be Given at the Client’s Request?1-16
  • § 1:9 : Customary Practice and the Extent of the Duty to Understand It; Customary Usage and Customary Diligence1-18
  • § 1:10 : The Empty Closing Opinion Problem1-20
  • § 1:11 : Avoiding Over-Exceptioning1-21
  • § 1:12 : Additional Opinions: Local Counsel; Specialized Counsel; Inside Counsel; “Additional Opinion Counsel”1-22
  • § 1:13 : Corporate Law Departments—Inside Counsel1-23
Chapter 2: Vocabulary and Usage in Closing Opinion Practice
  • § 2:1 : “It Is Our Opinion”: Stating and Limiting Opinions2-2
    • § 2:1.1 : Exceptions and Assumptions: “Exceptions” Include Opinion Limitations and Qualifications; Exception Form2-2
    • § 2:1.2 : When Is the Opinion “Unclear”?2-3
  • § 2:2 : The Significance of Vocabulary and Usage in Customary Practice2-4
  • § 2:3 : The (Un)Qualified Closing Opinion; the “Clean” Closing Opinion Ideal2-5
  • § 2:4 : Reasoned (or Explained) Opinions/Qualified and Unqualified2-6
  • § 2:5 : Standard Exceptions2-7
  • § 2:6 : “Stated” or “Specific” Exceptions2-8
  • § 2:7 : No “Updating” of Third-Party Closing Opinions2-8
  • § 2:8 : The “Opinion Pyramid” and the Separate Significance of Each Opinion2-9
  • § 2:9 : Parallel Options—The Traditional Starting Point for Closing Opinions Has Eroded2-10
  • § 2:10 : The “Umbrella” Opinion Versus the Unbundled Opinion2-11
  • § 2:11 : Spread of the Bankruptcy Exception and Equitable Principles Limitation Beyond the Remedies Opinion2-13
  • § 2:12 : Distinguishing Between “Future” Opinions and Performance Opinions2-14
    • § 2:12.1 : Need for Performance Opinion2-14
    • § 2:12.2 : Limits of Performance Opinions2-14
    • § 2:12.3 : The Many Faces of Future Opinions2-15
  • § 2:13 : The Use of Assumptions of Law2-16
  • § 2:14 : To My Knowledge/I Have No Knowledge2-16
    • § 2:14.1 : “To My Knowledge” As a Concept Related to Facts2-16
    • § 2:14.2 : “To My Knowledge” Fails As a Limitation2-16
    • § 2:14.3 : Negative Assurance2-17
  • § 2:15 : “Public Policy” Is Unacceptable As an Exception2-18
Chapter 3: Underlying Assumptions Shape Closing Opinion Practice
  • § 3:1 : Assumptions That Shape Opinion Practice3-2
  • § 3:2 : Customary Practice Is the Principal Basis for Closing Opinion Giving and Provides a Measure for Determining Whether There Is Liability to Third Parties3-2
  • § 3:3 : A Conservative Approach Is Required When Opinions Are Given to a Nonclient on Behalf of a Client3-5
    • § 3:3.1 : Restrictions Applicable to Opinions to Nonclients3-5
    • § 3:3.2 : Minimization of Opinions by Implication: The Limits of Opinion Giver Legal Knowledge3-7
    • § 3:3.3 : Avoiding Novel Opinion Forms3-9
    • § 3:3.4 : The Represented Closing Opinion Recipient3-9
    • § 3:3.5 : The Golden Rule3-10
    • § 3:3.6 : Current Oblique Customary Practice Statement: New Statement Suggested3-10
    • § 3:3.7 : Limitation on Further Use of a Closing Opinion Letter3-11
  • § 3:4 : The Preference for No-Exception Closing Opinions3-13
  • § 3:5 : Flexibility and the “Four Corners” Approach: Standard Customary Diligence3-13
  • § 3:6 : Closing Opinion Date and Practicality Limitations3-14
  • § 3:7 : Centrality of the “Law-Covered” Limitation3-16
  • § 3:8 : Fair Play in Closing Opinion Giving; the Misleading Closing Opinion3-16
  • § 3:9 : The Closing Opinion Recipient Has No Diligence Duty3-18
  • § 3:10 : Some Areas Excluded from Closing Opinion Coverage by Customary Practice3-19
  • § 3:11 : Closing Opinions Are Professional Judgments, Not Guarantees3-21
  • § 3:12 : The ABA Accord Alternative to Customary Practice3-21
Chapter 4: The Thought Process of the Closing Opinion Preparer--Emulating the Hypothetical Contemporaneous Court
  • § 4:1 : From Advocate to Objective Observer ;the Changed Mindset of the Opinion Preparer4-1
  • § 4:2 : The Predictive Quality of Opinions4-3
  • § 4:3 : The Time Frame for the Closing Opinion4-4
  • § 4:4 : Applying the Facts As Well As the Law to the Appropriate Time Frame4-5
  • § 4:5 : As to the Remedies Opinion and Other “Future Opinions,” “Future Facts” Must Be Used to Test Defenses4-5
  • § 4:6 : Governing Law to Be Applied4-8
  • § 4:7 : Knowledge of the Opinion Preparer4-9
Chapter 5: Establishing Facts and the Use of Factual Assumptions
  • § 5:1 : Central Role of Facts in Opinions5-2
  • § 5:2 : Truth, Facts, and the Limits of Commercially Reasonable Agreement-Based Fact Finding5-2
  • § 5:3 : Customary Diligence As to Facts5-4
  • § 5:4 : Supporting the Validity of the Commercially Reasonable Factual Search5-5
  • § 5:5 : The Patchwork Quilt of Facts and Assumptions5-6
  • § 5:6 : The Quality of the Patchwork—A Preference for Corporate Officer Certificates As to Client Information5-8
  • § 5:7 : The Acceptance of Client and Client-Related Representations5-9
  • § 5:8 : The Concept of “Establishing Facts”5-10
  • § 5:9 : The Formality of “Establishing Facts”5-11
  • § 5:10 : The “Appropriate Source” Requirement for Establishing Facts and the Automatic Deference to Filing Officers As the Appropriate Source5-12
  • § 5:11 : Unreliable Information and the “Irregular on Its Face” Limitation on Establishing Facts5-14
  • § 5:12 : The “Ultimate Fact” Limitation on Establishing Facts; Fact Certifications Tantamount to the Opinion to Be Given5-15
  • § 5:13 : Permitted Reliance on Ultimate Facts from Certain Public Agencies5-16
  • § 5:14 : Drafting—Reviewing Factual Certificates5-17
  • § 5:15 : Facts and the Opinion Giver’s Knowledge—A High-Risk Area5-17
  • § 5:16 : The Use of Assumptions As Fact Substitutes5-20
  • § 5:17 : Assumptions of Fact—Unstated and the Presumption of Regularity5-21
  • § 5:18 : Assumptions of Fact—Stated5-22
  • § 5:19 : Facts Available in the Opinion Giver’s Office5-22
  • § 5:20 : Opinion Preparers and the Handling of Factual Material5-23
Chapter 6: The Remedies Opinion
  • § 6:1 : Negotiation of Agreements and the Practical Value of the Remedies Opinion6-3
  • § 6:2 : Remedies Opinion and Enforceability Opinion Are Synonymous; The Opinion Is to Be Read As a Unit6-5
  • § 6:3 : Remedies Opinion Covers: Agreement Formation and Effectiveness of Undertakings6-5
  • § 6:4 : The Structure of Agreements: “Undertakings” Versus “Agreements”6-6
  • § 6:5 : Scope of the Term “Undertaking”6-6
  • § 6:6 : Remedies Opinion Covers Undertakings by the Client—Not the Opinion Recipient’s Undertakings6-7
  • § 6:7 : Meaning and Scope of the Remedies Opinion6-7
  • § 6:8 : Relating Scope to Timing6-8
  • § 6:9 : Legal Remedy Versus Practical Relief6-9
  • § 6:10 : Lack of Need to Define “Remedy”6-10
  • § 6:11 : The “Practical Realization” Limitation6-10
  • § 6:12 : An Inappropriate Form of Practical Realization Opinion6-11
  • § 6:13 : Acceptable Forms of the Remedies Opinion6-13
  • § 6:14 : Evolution of Remedies Opinion Custom6-13
  • § 6:15 : Remedies Opinion Exceptions; Agreement Exceptions and Specific Exceptions6-13
  • § 6:16 : Agreement Exceptions (Including Unstated Limitations) to Remedies Opinions6-15
    • § 6:16.1 : The Unavoidability of Agreement Exceptions Including Unstated Limitations6-15
    • § 6:16.2 : The So-Called “Bankruptcy Exception”6-15
    • § 6:16.3 : Equitable Principles (Including Reasonableness and Fair Dealing) Limitation6-18
      • [A] : Traditional Concepts of Equity6-20
      • [B] : Materiality6-20
      • [C] : Reasonableness, Good Faith, and Fair Dealing6-20
    • § 6:16.4 : Comity and the Allied Bank Case6-21
    • § 6:16.5 : Presidential Powers Under TWEA and IEEPA6-22
    • § 6:16.6 : Inherent Limitations on Governing Law6-23
  • § 6:17 : Specific Exceptions to Remedies Opinions6-24
  • § 6:18 : Formation of an Agreement6-24
  • § 6:19 : Violation of Foreign Law As an Opinion Exception6-25
  • § 6:20 : The Remedies Opinion and Arbitration6-26
  • § 6:21 : Submission to Jurisdiction Provisions6-26
  • § 6:22 : Economic Remedies—Liquidated Damages, Late Fees, Default Interest Rates—Reasonableness Test6-27
  • § 6:23 : Waiver of Right to Jury Trial; Charging Interest on Interest6-27
  • § 6:24 : Chosen Law6-28
Chapter 7: Agreement Characteristics, Opinions, and Multi-Jurisdictional Transactions
  • § 7:1 : Agreements and Forward-Looking Opinions7-2
  • § 7:2 : The Three Categories of Rights Addressed by Opinions7-3
  • § 7:3 : Chosen (Governing) Law Provisions7-4
  • § 7:4 : Choice of Law Rules Apply to Limit Chosen Law7-4
  • § 7:5 : The “One-State” Lawyer and Multi-Jurisdictional Transactions7-5
    • § 7:5.1 : Opinions by the Non-Admitted Lawyer7-7
    • § 7:5.2 : The Non-Admitted Lawyers’ Practice of Giving Delaware General Corporation Law Opinions7-7
    • § 7:5.3 : Most Non-Admitted Lawyers Do Not Give New York Financing Opinions; “Home Jurisdiction” Remedies Opinion Is Often Useful and Available from the Non-Admitted Lawyer7-8
    • § 7:5.4 : The Non-Admitted Lawyers’ Practice As to Limited Liability Company and Real Estate Opinions7-9
      • [A] : Real Estate7-9
      • [B] : Limited Liability Companies7-9
    • § 7:5.5 : The Non-Admitted Lawyer and Qualification to Do Business and Good Standing Opinions7-11
    • § 7:5.6 : Claims and No Conflict with Other Agreements Opinions in the Multi-State Setting7-11
  • § 7:6 : A Cost-Benefit Analysis for Multi-Jurisdictional Opinions7-11
Chapter 8: General Form of Third-Party Opinion Letters
  • § 8:1 : Brevity and the Absence of Surplusage; the Kitchen-Sink Opinion Problem8-3
  • § 8:2 : The Structure of the Opinion Letter8-3
  • § 8:3 : The Primacy of the “Laws-Covered” Language: Lack of Application of Laws-Covered Language to Litigation and to “No Breach or Default” Opinions8-5
  • § 8:4 : The Date—A Setting for the Opinion8-7
    • § 8:4.1 : The Opinion Date—Normally, the Closing Date8-7
    • § 8:4.2 : When the Opinion Date Is Not the Closing Date8-8
    • § 8:4.3 : Delivering an Opinion at a Distance8-9
  • § 8:5 : Reliance Rights8-10
    • § 8:5.1 : Reliance Rights of the Addressee8-10
    • § 8:5.2 : Reliance Rights of the Non-Addressees8-11
    • § 8:5.3 : Identification of Addressees and Others Entitled to Rely8-12
    • § 8:5.4 : Who Should Be the Addressee of a Local or Specialized Counsel’s Opinion That Is Relied On by the Opinion Giver?8-13
  • § 8:6 : The Opinion Requirement Source and Transaction Description8-13
  • § 8:7 : The Identification and Description of Activity of Counsel8-15
  • § 8:8 : Use of Defined Terms8-16
  • § 8:9 : Custom As to Deviations from Customary Practice8-17
  • § 8:10 : The General Rule That There Is No Limitation on Matters Investigated (Except As Stated)8-18
  • § 8:11 : Assumption As to the Authorization of the Other Side8-19
  • § 8:12 : Dealing with Multi-Jurisdictional and Specialized Law Situations8-20
    • § 8:12.1 : Limitations Applicable to Laws-Covered Limitation8-20
    • § 8:12.2 : Reliance on Local or Specialized Counsel; Concurrence and Satisfactory in Substance Versus Satisfactory in Form and Scope; Non-Reliance8-21
      • [A] : Reliance on Other Counsel8-21
      • [B] : Statement That Reliance Is Justified8-23
      • [C] : Statement of Concurrence8-23
  • § 8:13 : Signatures8-24
Chapter 9: Characteristic Third-Party Opinions
  • § 9:1 : The Three-Set Opinion Pattern9-3
  • § 9:2 : Identifying and Defining the Party Whose Status Is at Issue9-4
  • § 9:3 : Opinions as to Entity Status9-6
    • § 9:3.1 : Incorporated Status, Organization, and Valid Existence9-8
      • [A] : Incorporation9-9
      • [B] : Organization Requirements for Commencing Corporate Activity9-10
      • [C] : Valid Existence and the Continued Entitlement to Entity Status9-10
      • [D] : LLC and Other Non-Corporate Entity Opinions9-11
    • § 9:3.2 : Good Standing and Qualification to Do Business9-12
      • [A] : State Taxation Enforcement9-12
      • [B] : The Key Significance of the Certificates Themselves9-12
      • [C] : Formulating the “Doing Business” Opinion Request9-13
  • § 9:4 : Claims Including Litigation9-14
    • § 9:4.1 : Claims and the Corporate Due Diligence System9-15
    • § 9:4.2 : Litigation or Claims Concerning the Transaction9-16
    • § 9:4.3 : No-Investigation Opinions9-16
  • § 9:5 : Handling “Materiality” as an Opinion Term9-16
  • § 9:6 : Opinions About the Transaction9-17
    • § 9:6.1 : Contravention of Law9-17
    • § 9:6.2 : Breach of Other Agreements9-18
    • § 9:6.3 : Governmental Approvals9-19
    • § 9:6.4 : Corporate Power and Authority9-20
      • [A] : Corporate Power9-21
      • [B] : Corporate Authorization and Fiduciary Duty9-21
      • [C] : Other Entity Power and Authority9-24
    • § 9:6.5 : No Conflict with the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws9-24
    • § 9:6.6 : Conflict with Non-Corporate Entity Governing Documents9-25
Chapter 10: Closing Opinion Letters: The Role of Recipient's Counsel
  • § 10:1 : Recipient’s Counsel Owes a Duty to Its Client Only10-2
  • § 10:2 : Opinion Literature Regarding the Opinion Recipient and Its Counsel10-2
  • § 10:3 : Extent of the Duty of Recipient’s Counsel to Its Client10-3
  • § 10:4 : Varied Roles for Recipient’s Counsel10-4
  • § 10:5 : Acceptability of Counsel: Relation to Governing Law of Deal Documents10-7
  • § 10:6 : Acceptability of Closing Opinion Letter Content10-8
  • § 10:7 : Opinion Coverage10-9
    • § 10:7.1 : Information About the Opinion Giver’s Client10-10
    • § 10:7.2 : Is a Remedies Opinion Required?10-11
    • § 10:7.3 : Status; Power and Authorization Questions As to Regulated, Governmental, Subsidiary, and Fiduciary Parties10-11
    • § 10:7.4 : Supplementing Opinion Coverage to Deal with the Opinion Letter Laws-Covered Limitation10-11
  • § 10:8 : The Business Diligence Analysis of Opinions10-12
  • § 10:9 : A Preliminary Checklist for Assessing the Proposed Opinion10-13
    • § 10:9.1 : Customary Practice Meaning and Statement10-13
    • § 10:9.2 : Opinion Date10-13
    • § 10:9.3 : Acceptability of Counsel10-14
    • § 10:9.4 : Reliance by Opinion Recipient’s Counsel10-14
    • § 10:9.5 : Reliance by Non-Addressees10-14
    • § 10:9.6 : Laws-Covered Limitation10-14
    • § 10:9.7 : Performance Opinion10-14
    • § 10:9.8 : Acceptability of Knowledge Limitations10-14
    • § 10:9.9 : Negotiations on Materiality Limits10-15
    • § 10:9.10 : Opinion Signature10-15
    • § 10:9.11 : The Form of Bankruptcy Exception10-15
    • § 10:9.12 : Entity and Authorization Questions10-15
  • § 10:10 : Getting the Opinion Letter at or Before Closing10-15
Chapter 11: Opinion Preparer's Handling of Opinion Requests and the Overall Opinion Situation
  • § 11:1 : The Opinion Preparer’s Role11-1
  • § 11:2 : The Initial Opinion Request11-2
    • § 11:2.1 : Reviewing the Initial Opinion Request11-3
    • § 11:2.2 : An Opportunity to Educate the Opinion Recipient11-3
  • § 11:3 : When There Is Only a Non-Specific Opinion Request11-4
  • § 11:4 : Avoiding Delay and Anticipating Costs—Dealing with Issues and Other Counsel11-4
  • § 11:5 : The Time for a Detailed Response to the Refined Opinion Request11-5
  • § 11:6 : Granting Non-Addressees Reliance in an Opinion Letter11-6
  • § 11:7 : The Client’s Role in the Opinion Request Negotiation11-7
    • § 11:7.1 : Access to the Client and Reducing Opinion Costs11-7
  • § 11:8 : Last-Minute Exceptions Taken from Other Opinions11-8
  • § 11:9 : Anticipating the Final Comments of Opinion Recipient’s Counsel11-8
  • § 11:10 : Comments from Other Interested Parties11-9
Chapter 12: The Opinion Committee: Internal Standards for Opinion Giving
  • § 12:1 : Opinion Committees Are Common in Firms with a Substantial Corporate Practice12-1
  • § 12:2 : Specialization and the Opinion Committee12-2
  • § 12:3 : Multi-Jurisdictional and Transnational Law Practice, Law Firm Mergers, Lateral Partners and the Opinion Committee12-3
  • § 12:4 : Typical Opinion Committee Patterns12-4
    • § 12:4.1 : Educational Activities12-4
    • § 12:4.2 : Hotlines12-4
    • § 12:4.3 : Second-Partner Review12-4
    • § 12:4.4 : Reviewing the Unusual Opinion12-5
    • § 12:4.5 : Formal Versus Informal Opinion Consultation12-5
    • § 12:4.6 : Practice Leader Opinion Coordination12-6
  • § 12:5 : Opinion Review Partner (Lawyer) Role in Controlling Deal Liability12-6
  • § 12:6 : Self-Assessment Regarding Closing Opinions12-7
Chapter 13: Ethics and Professional Liability
  • § 13:1 : The Ethical Propriety of Third-Party Opinions13-2
    • § 13:1.1 : Fair and Objective but Not Independent13-2
    • § 13:1.2 : No Disclosure to a Third Party Since Duty to the Client Is Disclosed13-3
  • § 13:2 : Whose Opinion Is It—Opinion Giver’s or Opinion Preparer’s?13-3
  • § 13:3 : Privity, Near Privity, and Liability13-5
  • § 13:4 : Model Rule 2.313-6
  • § 13:5 : Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers,Sections 51 and 9513-6
  • § 13:6 : Customary Practice and Liability13-7
  • § 13:7 : Customary Practice Contemplates a National Custom Rather Than a Local-Practice Standard13-8
  • § 13:8 : Customary Practice—The Specialist and the “Below-Average” Lawyer13-9
  • § 13:9 : Client Confidentiality13-9
  • § 13:10 : Liability to a Client for Negligent Acceptance of an Opinion13-11
  • § 13:11 : Anti-Third-Party Legal Opinion Legislation—Rhode Island13-11
  • § 13:12 : Limiting Opinion Liability to Clients and Nonclients13-11
  • § 13:13 : Fraud and Opinions13-12
Chapter 14: Opinions About Non-Corporate Entities and Arrangements
  • § 14:1 : Introduction14-2
  • § 14:2 : Two Types of Non-Corporate Entity14-2
    • § 14:2.1 : Statutory Permission Entities14-2
    • § 14:2.2 : Common-Law Arrangements14-3
  • § 14:3 : Establishing Relevant Documentation14-4
    • § 14:3.1 : Statutory Permission Entities14-4
    • § 14:3.2 : Common-Law Entities14-4
  • § 14:4 : Status Opinions14-5
    • § 14:4.1 : Formation—Organization14-5
    • § 14:4.2 : Existence and Good Standing14-6
  • § 14:5 : Power and Authority14-6
    • § 14:5.1 : Power14-6
    • § 14:5.2 : Action14-7
    • § 14:5.3 : Other Opinions14-7
Chapter 15: Closing Opinions to Clients
  • § 15:1 : Introduction15-2
  • § 15:2 : Formal Letter Versus Informal Advice15-2
  • § 15:3 : Responsibility to the Client Depends on Context of Entire Engagement15-3
  • § 15:4 : Responsibility After Closing15-3
  • § 15:5 : Identifying the Client15-4
    • § 15:5.1 : Organization Is the Client, Not an Officer of It15-4
    • § 15:5.2 : All Members of the Group May Be Clients15-4
    • § 15:5.3 : Client Successors15-5
  • § 15:6 : Advice to Clients in the Regulatory Context15-5
    • § 15:6.1 : Primacy of Regulatory Context15-5
    • § 15:6.2 : Sarbanes-Oxley and the Regulation of Client Advice Under the Securities Laws15-5
  • § 15:7 : Limited Applicability of Third-Party Customary Practice to Opinions to Clients15-6
    • § 15:7.1 : Customary Usage15-6
    • § 15:7.2 : Customary Diligence15-6
  • § 15:8 : Significant Differences from Third-Party Opinions15-7
  • § 15:9 : Will Opinion to the Client Be Implied from a Third-Party Opinion?15-8
  • § 15:10 : Liability for an Opinion Negligently Given to a Client15-9
  • § 15:11 : Statute of Limitations Questions15-9
Chapter 16: Handling Liability Claims
  • § 16:1 : Introduction16-2
    • § 16:1.1 : Level of Experience16-2
    • § 16:1.2 : Critical Environment16-3
  • § 16:2 : Legal Malpractice Terminology16-4
    • § 16:2.1 : Legal Malpractice and Ethics Terminology16-4
      • [A] : Standard of Care and Standard of Conduct16-4
      • [B] : Legal Malpractice Versus Legal Ethics16-5
      • [C] : Perceived Errors Versus Actual Errors16-5
      • [D] : Potential Claims Versus Actual Claims16-6
    • § 16:2.2 : Legal Malpractice Insurance Terminology16-6
    • § 16:2.3 : Legal Malpractice Litigation Terminology16-7
      • [A] : Experts16-7
      • [B] : Motions to Dismiss16-7
      • [C] : Motions for Summary Judgment16-9
  • § 16:3 : Distinction Between Perceived Errors and Actual Errors16-9
  • § 16:4 : Confidentiality and Waiver16-10
  • § 16:5 : Remedial Actions, Consents and Admissions16-12
    • § 16:5.1 : Unilateral Action16-12
    • § 16:5.2 : Consent16-13
    • § 16:5.3 : Admissions16-13
    • § 16:5.4 : Statutes of Limitations16-13
  • § 16:6 : Location, Location, Location16-14
  • § 16:7 : Insurance Coverage Issues16-15
  • § 16:8 : Communications with Insurance Carriers16-16
  • § 16:9 : Selecting Defense Counsel16-16
  • § 16:10 : Practical Suggestions16-17
    • § 16:10.1 : Introduction16-17
    • § 16:10.2 : Responsiveness to Potential or Actual Claims16-18
    • § 16:10.3 : Advance Planning16-18
    • § 16:10.4 : Complaints by Private Third Parties16-19
    • § 16:10.5 : Complaints by the Client16-20
    • § 16:10.6 : Complaints by Governmental Entities16-21
    • § 16:10.7 : Selecting Consultative Experts and Testimonial Experts16-21
      • [A] : Consultative Experts16-21
      • [B] : Retaining Testimonial Experts16-22
      • [C] : Testimonial Expert’s Qualifications16-22
Chapter 17: Getting Started: An Outline for Those Beginning to Learn About Opinions
  • § 17:1 : Introduction17-1
  • § 17:2 : History17-1
  • § 17:3 : Vocabulary17-2
  • § 17:4 : Ethical Framework17-2
  • § 17:5 : The Opinion Giver’s Degree of Certainty17-2
  • § 17:6 : Liability to the Closing Opinion Recipient17-2
  • § 17:7 : The Customary Practice System17-3
  • § 17:8 : Basic Reading About Opinions17-3
  • § 17:9 : Realistic Limits on Legal Opinions—Time, Cost and Context17-3
  • § 17:10 : Opinion Letter Paragraphs Versus Opinions17-4
  • § 17:11 : The Opinion Letter As an Attempt to Transmit Information17-4
  • § 17:12 : Professional Risk and a Conservative Approach17-4
Chapter 18: Appendix A: ABA Guidelines II
Chapter 19: Appendix B: ABA Principles; And Appendix B1: Multi-Bar Statement on the Role of Customary Practice in the Preparation and Understanding of Third-Party Legal Opinions
Chapter 20: Appendix C: Third-Party "Closing" Opinions
Chapter 21: Appendix D: Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers Section 95
Chapter 22: Appendix E: Restatement (Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers Section 51
Chapter 23: Appendix F: Model Rule 2.3
Chapter 24: Appendix G: Restatement (Second) of the Law of Torts Section 299A
Chapter 25: Appendix H: Restatement (Second) of the Law of Torts Section 552
Chapter 26: Appendix I: TriBar U.C.C. Security Report
Chapter 27: Appendix J: ABA Closing Opinions of Inside Counsel Report
Chapter 28: Appendix K: Negative Assurance in Securities Offerings (2008 Revision)
Chapter 29: Appendix L: Third-Party Closing Opinions: Limited Liability Companies
Chapter 30: Appendix M: The Remedies Opinions: Deciding When to Include Exceptions and Assumptions
Chapter 31: Appendix N: Law Office Opinion Practice
Chapter 32: Appendix O: TriBar Opinion Committee: Duly Authorized Opinions on Preferred Stock
Chapter 33: Appendix P: TriBar Opinion Committee: Opinion in the Bankruptcy Context: Rating Agency, Structured Financing and Chapter 11 Transactions
Chapter 34: Appendix Q: Citibar Committee on Bankruptcy and Corporate Reorganizations (N.Y.): Preparation of Substantive Consolidation Opinions
Chapter 35: Appendix R: Third-Party "Closing" Opinions Section 1.9 Opinion Terminology
Chapter 36: Appendix S: Rule 4.1: Truthfulness In Statements to Others
Chapter 37: Forms 1-5
Chapter 38: Table of Authorities
Chapter 39: Index to Legal Opinions in Business Transactions

  Please click here to view the latest update information for this title: Last Update Information  
 


  Please click here to view the Table of Authorities: Table of Authorities  
 

Print Share Email
News & Expert Analysis

May 17, 2013

Unanimous SCOTUS Sides with Monsanto on Seeds

From: Patent Law Practice Center

On Monday, May 13, 2013, the United States Supreme...

May 13, 2013

Federal Circuit Makes Mess of Software Patents

From: Patent Law Practice Center

In what can only fairly be characterized as a pate...

May 8, 2013

A Conversation about Software Patents

From: Patent Law Practice Center

On March 25, 2013, I spoke on the record with Eric...