On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Supreme Court Review (16th Annual): October 2013 Term

Released on: Aug. 12, 2014
Running Time: 06:21:10

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[00:54:37] Overview of the October 2013 Term: The Court Focuses on First Amendment Freedoms Professor Marci A Hamilton ~ Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University
Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Law Office of Leon Friedman
Professor Michael C Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
Joan Biskupic ~ Editor in Charge, Legal Affairs, Reuters News
Kannon K Shanmugam ~ Williams & Connolly LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:01:58] Freedom of Speech Professor Marci A Hamilton ~ Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University
Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Law Office of Leon Friedman
Professor Burt Neuborne ~ Inez Milholland Professor of Civil Liberties, Founding Legal Director, Brennan Center of Justice, New York University School of Law
Professor Michael C Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
Joan Biskupic ~ Editor in Charge, Legal Affairs, Reuters News
Kannon K Shanmugam ~ Williams & Connolly LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:58:37] Freedom of Religion Professor Marci A Hamilton ~ Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University
Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Law Office of Leon Friedman
Professor Burt Neuborne ~ Inez Milholland Professor of Civil Liberties, Founding Legal Director, Brennan Center of Justice, New York University School of Law
Professor Michael C Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Joan Biskupic ~ Editor in Charge, Legal Affairs, Reuters News
Kannon K Shanmugam ~ Williams & Connolly LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:58:48] Separation of Powers Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Law Office of Leon Friedman
Professor Michael C Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:54] Criminal Procedure Professor Marci A Hamilton ~ Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University
Professor Martin A. Schwartz ~ Professor of Law, Touro Law Center
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
Professor Sherry F Colb ~ Professor of Law, Charles Evans Hughes Scholar, Cornell Law School
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:11:11] Litigation Issues: Civil Rights Litigation and Business Interests Professor Marci A Hamilton ~ Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University
Professor Martin A. Schwartz ~ Professor of Law, Touro Law Center
Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Law Office of Leon Friedman
Professor Michael C Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
On-Demand MP3 MP4

At PLI’s 16th Annual Supreme Court Review program, a distinguished faculty of constitutional scholars, Supreme Court advocates, and a Supreme Court journalist will analyze and discuss the leading Supreme Court decisions of the October 2013 Term for their precedential, doctrinal and, where appropriate, societal significance.


Lecture Topics [Total time 06:21:10]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.


  • Introduction* [00:15:05]
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Professor Martin A. Schwartz
  • Overview of the October 2013 Term: The Court Focuses on First Amendment Freedoms [00:54:37]
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Joan Biskupic, Professor Leon Friedman, Professor Marci A. Hamilton, Professor Michael C. Dorf, Kannon K. Shanmugam
  • Freedom of Speech [01:01:58]
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Professor Leon Friedman, Professor Michael C. Dorf, Professor Burt Neuborne, Kannon K. Shanmugam, Joan Biskupic, Professor Marci A. Hamilton
  • Freedom of Religion [00:58:37]
    Professor Leon Friedman, Professor Marci A. Hamilton, Professor Michael C. Dorf, Professor Burt Neuborne, Kannon K. Shanmugam, Joan Biskupic
  • Separation of Powers [00:58:48]
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Professor Leon Friedman, Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • Criminal Procedure [01:00:54]
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Professor Martin A. Schwartz, Professor Sherry F. Colb, Professor Marci A. Hamilton
  • Litigation Issues: Civil Rights Litigation and Business Interests [01:11:11]
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Professor Martin A. Schwartz, Professor Leon Friedman, Professor Michael C. Dorf, Professor Marci A. Hamilton

Presentation Material


  • 16th Annual Supreme Court Review: October 2013 Term - Table of Contents, Schedule, Faculty Bios
  • Supreme Court Term in Review: October Term 2013
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky
  • A Harbinger of Things to Come
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky
  • Supreme Court Decisions, 2013-14 Term
    Professor Leon Friedman
  • Just Shy of Bribery: The Roberts Court Embraces Francis Underwood's View of Washington
    Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • Madison's Music: Lost and Found
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky
  • Sectarianism and the Establishment Clause
    Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • The Insatiable Demand for Extreme Religious Liberty Under the RFRAs, Part I
    Professor Marci A. Hamilton
  • The Insatiable Demand for Extreme Religious Liberty Under the RFRAs, Part II
    Professor Marci A. Hamilton
  • The Supreme Court Ducks a Treaty Power Question but Raises Broader Questions
    Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • Did the Supreme Court Err by Rejecting Political Deadlock as a Basis for Recess Appointments?
    Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • Selected Criminal Procedure Decisions, United States Supreme Court - October 2013 Term (October 2013-June 2014)
    Professor Martin A. Schwartz
  • The U.S. Supreme Court Considers Anonymous Tips: Part One
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • The U.S. Supreme Court Considers Anonymous Tips: Part Two
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • U.S. Supreme Court Considers When Heroin Dealing "Results" in Death: Part One
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • U.S. Supreme Court Considers When Heroin Dealing "Results" in Death - Part Two
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • A Murder Case Highlights an Odd Exception to the Sixth Amendment
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • The U.S. Supreme Court's View of Consent in Fernandez v. California
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • Burrage v. United States and the Role of Harm Causation in Culpability
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • Minnesota Court Rules that First Amendment Protects Encouraging a Suicide
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • U.S. Supreme Court Considers Whether the Fourth Amendment Allows Reasonable Mistakes of Substantive Law: Part One
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • U.S. Supreme Court Considers Whether the Fourth Amendment Allows Reasonable Mistakes of Substantive Law: Part Two
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • The U.S. Supreme Court Narrows States' Discretion to Execute the Intellectually Disabled
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • The Supreme Court Decides Riley v. California and Updates the Fourth Amendment
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • The Dilemma of Humane Execution and Humane Slaughter
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • Do Brown v. Plata and Hall v. Florida Mark an Emerging Jurisprudence of Constitutional Risk?
    Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • Civil Rights Litigation: Supreme Court October 2013 Term (October 2013 to June 2014)
    Professor Martin A. Schwartz
  • Selected Business Cases
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky
Co-Chair(s)
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
Professor Martin A. Schwartz ~ Professor of Law, Touro Law Center
Speaker(s)
Joan Biskupic ~ Editor in Charge, Legal Affairs, Reuters News
Professor Sherry F. Colb ~ Professor of Law, Charles Evans Hughes Scholar, Cornell Law School
Professor Michael C. Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Law Office of Leon Friedman
Professor Marci A. Hamilton ~ Paul R. Verkuil Chair in Public Law, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, Yeshiva University
Professor Burt Neuborne ~ Inez Milholland Professor of Civil Liberties, Founding Legal Director, Brennan Center of Justice, New York University School of Law
Kannon K. Shanmugam ~ Williams & Connolly LLP

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the Credit Information box to the right of each product description for credit information specific to your state.


On-Demand Web Programs and Segments
 are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.


Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Print Share Email
"Great panelists and excellent, energetic presentation."
- 2013 Attendee

“As it is every year, great program. Thank you very much for taking the time to put it together.”
– 2013 webcast attendee

“This was a great program. Very thought-provoking.”
- 2013 webcast attendee