On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Supreme Court Review (15th Annual): October 2012 Term

Released on: Aug. 13, 2013
Running Time: 06:25:25

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:25:45] Overview of the October 2012 Term: The Court Focuses on Equality Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Law Office of Leon Friedman
Professor Burt Neuborne ~ Inez Milholland Professor of Civil Liberties, Founding Legal Director, Brennan Center of Justice, New York University School of Law
Professor Theodore M. Shaw ~ Professor of Law, Columbia Law School; Of Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright;, Former Director-Counsel & President, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
Professor Michael C. Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
Joan Biskupic ~ Editor in Charge, Legal Affairs, Reuters News
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:26] Race and the Constitution: Voting Rights and Affirmative Action Professor Burt Neuborne ~ Inez Milholland Professor of Civil Liberties, Founding Legal Director, Brennan Center of Justice, New York University School of Law
Professor Theodore M. Shaw ~ Professor of Law, Columbia Law School; Of Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright;, Former Director-Counsel & President, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
Professor Michael C. Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
Joan Biskupic ~ Editor in Charge, Legal Affairs, Reuters News
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:58:49] Individual Liberties: Freedom of Speech and Marriage Equality Professor Martin A. Schwartz ~ Professor of Law, Touro Law Center
Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Law Office of Leon Friedman
Professor Burt Neuborne ~ Inez Milholland Professor of Civil Liberties, Founding Legal Director, Brennan Center of Justice, New York University School of Law
Professor Theodore M. Shaw ~ Professor of Law, Columbia Law School; Of Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright;, Former Director-Counsel & President, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
Professor Michael C. Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
Joan Biskupic ~ Editor in Charge, Legal Affairs, Reuters News
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:15:47] Criminal Procedure Professor Martin A. Schwartz ~ Professor of Law, Touro Law Center
Professor Theodore M. Shaw ~ Professor of Law, Columbia Law School; Of Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright;, Former Director-Counsel & President, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
Professor Sherry F. Colb ~ Professor of Law, Charles Evans Hughes Scholar, Cornell Law School
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:46:37] Litigation and Dispute Resolution Issues: Class Actions, Arbitration and Title VII Civil Rights Claims Professor Martin A. Schwartz ~ Professor of Law, Touro Law Center
Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Law Office of Leon Friedman
Professor Theodore M. Shaw ~ Professor of Law, Columbia Law School; Of Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright;, Former Director-Counsel & President, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.
Professor Michael C. Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Professor Thomas W. Merrill ~ Charles Evans Hughes Professor of Law, Columbia University School of Law
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:56:11] Business and Property Interests Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Law Office of Leon Friedman
Professor Michael C. Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
Professor Thomas W. Merrill ~ Charles Evans Hughes Professor of Law, Columbia University School of Law
On-Demand MP3 MP4
A distinguished faculty, including constitutional scholars, a law school dean, and a Supreme Court journalist, will analyze, discuss, and debate the leading Supreme Court decisions of the October 2012 Term. The faculty represents a variety of constitutional views and perspectives, and the decisions will be analyzed for their precedential, doctrinal, and, where appropriate, their societal and litigation significance.

Lecture Topics 
[Total time 06:25:25]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Introduction* [00:01:50]
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Professor Martin A. Schwartz
  • Overview of the October 2012 Term: The Court Focuses on Equality [01:25:45]
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Joan Biskupic, Professor Michael C. Dorf, Professor Leon Friedman, Professor Burt Neuborne, Professor Theodore M. Shaw
  • Race and the Constitution: Voting Rights and Affirmative Action [01:00:26]
    Professor Burt Neuborne, Professor Theodore M. Shaw, Joan Biskupic, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • Individual Liberties: Freedom of Speech and Marriage Equality [00:58:49]
    Professor Burt Neuborne, Professor Theodore M. Shaw, Joan Biskupic, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Professor Michael C. Dorf, Professor Leon Friedman, Professor Martin A. Schwartz
  • Criminal Procedure [01:15:47]
    Professor Sherry F. Colb, Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Professor Theodore M. Shaw, Professor Martin A. Schwartz
  • Litigation and Dispute Resolution Issues: Class Actions, Arbitration and Title VII Civil Rights Claims [00:46:37]
    Professor Theodore M. Shaw, Professor Michael C. Dorf, Professor Leon Friedman, Professor Thomas W. Merrill, Professor Martin A. Schwartz
  • Business and Property Interests [00:56:11]
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Professor Michael C. Dorf, Professor Leon Friedman, Professor Thomas W. Merrill

Presentation Material

  • Supreme Court Review: October Term 2012
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky
  • Supreme Court Term in Review: The Court Affects All of Us
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky
  • Overview of the October 2012 Term: The Court Focuses on Equality
    Professor Leon Friedman
  • The Supreme Court Rejects Arizona's Requirement that Voters Prove Their Citizenship - For Now
    Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • Justice Scalia's Long Campaign Against "Racial Entitlements" Takes an Unexpected Turn
    Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • Race and the Constitution: Voting Rights and Affirmative Action
  • The Troubling Emergence of Novelty-Skepticism on the Supreme Court
    Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • United States v. Windsor and a Thought on Hollingsworth v. Perry
    Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • Taking Hearers Seriously
    Professor Burt Neuborne
  • Selecter Criminal Procedure Decisions, United States Supreme Court October 2012 Term (October 2012-June 2013)
    Professor Martin A. Schwartz
  • A Unanimous Supreme Court Ruling Underscores the Limits of Habeas Corpus as a Remedy for State Prisoners
    Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • Evans v. Michigan: The Supreme Court Mulls Over Double Jeopardy, Again
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • Salinas v. Texas in the U.S. Supreme Court: Does the Fifth Amendment Protect the Right to Remain Silent? (Part One)
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • Salinas v. Texas in the U.S. Supreme Court: Does the Fifth Amendment Protect the Right to Remain Silent? (Part 2)
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • Do People Under Arrest Have a Privac Right in Their DNA? The U.S. Supreme Court Hears Argument in Maryland v. King (Part 1)
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • Do People Under Arrest Have a Privacy Right in Their DNA? The U.S. Supreme Court Hears Argument in Maryland v. King (Part 2)
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • The Road to Justice Scalia is Paved with (Some) Intentions: The Supreme Court Decides Maryland v. King
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • The U.S. Supreme Court Considers Dog Sniffs and the Fourth Amendment (Part 1)
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • The U.S. Supreme Court Considers Dog Sniffs and the Fourth Amendment (Part 2)
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • The U.S. Supreme Court Declares Warrantless Dog Sniffs of Private Front Porches Unconstitutional, Or Does It? A Closer Look at Florida v. Jardines
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • The U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Blood Tests for Drunk Driving Suspects Require a Search Warrant: A Wise Decision?
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • What Does the Sixth Amendment Right to Jury Trial Protect?: The Supreme Court Decides Alleyne v. United States
    Professor Sherry F. Colb
  • Two Recent Supreme Court Cases Sow Confusion About the Standard for Certifying Class Actions
    Professor Michael C. Dorf
  • American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant
  • Oxford Health Plans LLC v. Sutter
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center v. Nassar
  • Vance v. Ball State University
  • McBurney v. Young
  • Some Good News for Human Rights Lawyers in the Supreme Court's Interpretation of the Alien Tort Statute
  • Of "Singles" Without Baseball: Corporations as Frozen Relational Moments
  • Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District
  • Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. Bartlett
  • Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
  • Federal Trade Commission v. Actavis, Inc.
    Dean Erwin Chemerinsky, Professor Michael C. Dorf, Professor Leon Friedman, Professor Thomas W. Merrill
Co-Chair(s)
Dean Erwin Chemerinsky ~ Dean and Distinguished Professor of Law, Raymond Pryke Professor of First Amendment Law, University of California, Irvine School of Law
Professor Martin A. Schwartz ~ Professor of Law, Touro Law Center
Speaker(s)
Joan Biskupic ~ Editor in Charge, Legal Affairs, Reuters News
Professor Sherry F. Colb ~ Professor of Law, Charles Evans Hughes Scholar, Cornell Law School
Professor Michael C. Dorf ~ Robert S. Stevens Professor of Law, Cornell Law School
Professor Leon Friedman ~ Joseph Kushner Distinguished Professor of Civil Liberties Law, Hofstra University School of Law, Law Office of Leon Friedman
Professor Thomas W. Merrill ~ Charles Evans Hughes Professor of Law, Columbia University School of Law
Professor Burt Neuborne ~ Inez Milholland Professor of Civil Liberties, Founding Legal Director, Brennan Center of Justice, New York University School of Law
Professor Theodore M. Shaw ~ Professor of Law, Columbia Law School; Of Counsel, Norton Rose Fulbright;, Former Director-Counsel & President, NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the Credit Information box to the right of each product description for credit information specific to your state.


On-Demand Web Programs and Segments
 are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.


Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Print Share Email