On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Patent Law Institute (7th Annual)

Released on: Apr. 2, 2013
Running Time: 12:46:15

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:06:41] PTO Update Brian Hanlon ~ Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:59:46] Recent Cases Denise M. De Mory ~ Bunsow De Mory Smith & Allison LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:31] Breakout Session I: Litigation: Managing Patent Litigation: Containing Costs and Maintaining Efficiency Cynthia Bright ~ IP Litigation Counsel, Hewlett Packard Co
Robert J. Spar ~ Patent Prosecution and Practice Specialist, Director (Ret.) OPLA, USPTO,
Frances E. Marshall ~ Special Counsel for Intellectual Property, Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice
John M. White ~ Berenato & White, LLC; Director of Patent Professional Development, PLI,
Brian Hanlon ~ Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office
Matthew J. Bye ~ Senior Competition Counsel, Google Inc.
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:11] Breakout Session II: Litigation: Patent Damages – Keeping Up With the Changing Rules Scott M. Alter ~ Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Kimberly N. Van Voorhis ~ Morrison & Foerster LLP
Robert J. Spar ~ Patent Prosecution and Practice Specialist, Director (Ret.) OPLA, USPTO,
Dawn Hall ~ Managing Director - Forensic Consulting, FTI Consulting
John M. White ~ Berenato & White, LLC; Director of Patent Professional Development, PLI,
Brian Hanlon ~ Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:01] Breakout Session III: Litigation: Developments in Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation Roberta Jean Hanson ~ Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Nicholas Godici ~ Executive Advisor, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP
Robert R. Sachs ~ Fenwick & West LLP
Leonard Richard Svensson ~ Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP
Asim Bhansali ~ Keker & Van Nest LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:30:06] Dialogue Between the Bench and the Bar Hon. Patti B. Saris ~ District Judge, United States District Court, District of Massachusetts
Donald R. Dunner ~ Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Hon. Paul R. Michel (Ret.) ~ Chief Judge,
Carter G. Phillips ~ Sidley Austin LLP
John M. Whealan ~ Intellectual Property Advisory Board Associate Dean for Intellectual Property Law Studies, George Washington University Law School
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:31] Breakout Session IV: Litigation: Litigation Advice From the Bench Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley ~ Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California
Margaret M. Dunbar, M.S. ~ Senior Director, Intellectual Property and Legal Affairs, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute
Alison M. Tucher ~ Morrison & Foerster LLP
Leonard Richard Svensson ~ Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP
Daryl L. Joseffer ~ King & Spalding LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:01:06] Breakout Session V: Strategic/Transactional: Hot Topics in Technology Transfer and Licensing Margaret M. Dunbar, M.S. ~ Senior Director, Intellectual Property and Legal Affairs, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute
Nader A. Mousavi ~ Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Leonard Richard Svensson ~ Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP
Cheryl A. Fragiadakis ~ Technology Transfer Department Head, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:31] Litigating Against Non-Practicing Entities Philip W. Marsh ~ Agility IP Law
Andrew N. Thomases ~ Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:51] Patent Markets Ken Lustig ~ Vice President, Strategic Acquisitions, Divestitures and Client Engagement, Intellectual Ventures Management LLC
David Kaefer ~ General Manager, IP Licensing & Sales, Microsoft Corp
James A. Kovacs ~ , Deputy Director of Intel Licensing and Patent Acquisitions, Intel Corporation
Kevin Barhydt ~ VP, Head of Acquisitions and Analysis, RPX Corporation
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:58:36] Corporate Counsel Panel T.J. Angioletti ~ Associate General Counsel, Technology & Transactions, Netflix
Joseph T. FitzGerald ~ Senior Vice President of Public and Legal Affairs, Symantec Corporation
Allen M. Lo ~ Deputy General Counsel, Google, Inc.
Heath Hoglund ~ Chief Patent Counsel, Dolby
Steven A. McAuley ~ Vice President & Chief Patent Counsel, CRV, Boston Scientific Corporation
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:46] PTO Ethics and the AIA Eugene R. Quinn, Jr. ~ President and Founder, IPWatchdog.com, IPWatchdog, Inc.
On-Demand MP3 MP4

The Institute is designed to be of ultimate practice value to all three subgroups in the patent law community: patent prosecutors, patent litigators, and strategic/transactional lawyers.

Do not miss this unique opportunity to sharpen your practice skills and network with federal judges, USPTO officials, in-house counsel and outside patent lawyers.

Lecture Topics 
[Total time 12:46:15]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Program Overview* [00:06:38]
    Scott M. Alter, Douglas R. Nemec, John M. White
  • PTO Update [01:06:41]
    Brian Hanlon
  • Recent Cases [00:59:46]
    Denise M. De Mory
  • Breakout Session I: Litigation: Managing Patent Litigation [01:00:31]
    Cynthia Bright, Brian Hanlon, Robert J. Spar, John M. White, Frances E. Marshall, Matthew J. Bye
  • Breakout Session II: Litigation: Patent Damages - Keeping Up With the Changing Rules  [01:00:11]
    Brian Hanlon, Robert J. Spar, John M. White, Dawn Hall, Kimberly N. Van Voorhis, Scott M. Alter
  • Breakout Session III: Litigation: Developments in Pharma & Biotech Patent Litigation [01:00:01]
    Asim Bhansali, Nicholas Godici, Leonard Richard Svensson, Robert R. Sachs, Roberta Jean Hanson
  • Dialogue Between the Bench and the Bar [01:30:06]
    Donald R. Dunner, Hon. Paul R. Michel (Ret.), Carter G. Phillips, Hon. Patti B. Saris, John M. Whealan
  • Breakout Session IV: Litigation: Litigation Advice from the Bench  [01:00:31]
    Margaret M. Dunbar, M.S., Leonard Richard Svensson, Daryl L. Joseffer, Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley, Alison M. Tucher
  • Breakout Sessions V: Strategic/Transactional: Hot Topics in Technology Transfer and Licensing [01:01:06]
    Margaret M. Dunbar, M.S., Leonard Richard Svensson, Cheryl A. Fragiadakis, Nader A. Mousavi
  • Litigating Against Non-Practicing Entities [01:00:31]
    Andrew N. Thomases, Philip W. Marsh
  • Patent Markets [01:00:51]
    Kevin Barhydt, David Kaefer, Ken Lustig, James A. Kovacs
  • Corporate Counsel Panel [00:58:36]
    T.J. Angioletti, Joseph T. FitzGerald, Heath Hoglund, Allen M. Lo, Steven A. McAuley
  • PTO Ethics and the AIA [01:00:46]
    Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property: "Implementation of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act", May 16, 2012
    John M. White, David J. Kappos
  • Recent Cases
    Robert Neuner
  • 2012 Federal Circuit Review--The Road Less Traveled
    Denise M. De Mory, Aaron R. Hand
  • Managing Patent Litigation
    Cynthia Bright
  • AIA Phase II (Effective September 16, 2012) Summary
    John M. White
  • Six "Small" Proposals for SSOs Before Lunch: Remarks As Prepared for the ITU-T Patent Roundtable, Geneva, Switzerland, October 10, 2012
    Frances E. Marshall, Renata Hesse
  • Patent Infringement Remedies--An Overview and Update
    Kimberly N. Van Voorhis, Dawn Hall
  • Prosecution Breakout Part II--AIA: Inter Partes Review
    John M. White
  • ANDA Litigation and Biosimilars Litigations: How Will Post-Grant Review and Inter Partes Review Proceedings Alter Litigation Strategy for These Actions?
    Dorothy R. Auth, Ph.D.
  • Antitrust Issues in ANDA Litigation
    Asim Bhansali, Paula L. Blizzard
  • Final Rules Implementing the America Invents Act
    Stephen G. Kunin
  • Section 102 Under the AIA
    Leonard Richard Svensson
  • Into the "Murky Morass": The Uncertain State of Patentable Subject Matter in the United States
    Erika Harmon Arner
  • Order Denying Motion to Compel Following in Camera Review, Alzheimer's Institute of America v. Elan Corporation PLC, et al., No. C-10-482-EDL, (USDC, NDCA, EDL, September 19, 2011)
    Douglas R. Nemec
  • Order Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Compel, Datel Holdings Ltd v. Microsoft Corporation, No. C-09-05535 EDL, (USDC, NDCA, EDL, July 29, 2011)
    Douglas R. Nemec
  • Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part NetApp's Motion to Compel and Granting in Part and Denying in Part Outstanding Issues Sun Seeks from NetApp, Sun Microsystems Inc. v. Network Appliance, No. C-08-01641 EDL, (USDC, NDCA, EDL, Dec. 21, 2009)
    Douglas R. Nemec
  • Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Without Prejudice Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Responses to Interrogatory No. 10, Overture Services, Inc. v. Google Inc., No. C-02-1991 CRB (EDL), (USDC, NDCA, EDL, January 8, 2004)
    Douglas R. Nemec
  • Chemical/Pharma Cases and AIA Concerns
    Leonard Richard Svensson, Gerald M. Murphy, Jr.
  • The State of Joint Infringement Law After the Federal Circuit's Decisions in Akamai & McKesson
    Daryl L. Joseffer
  • Litigating Against Non-Practicing Entities
    P. Anthony Sammi
  • Bio Cases and AIA Concerns
    Leonard Richard Svensson, Gerald M. Murphy, Jr.
  • Accessing Technologies from Universities and National Labs
    Cheryl A. Fragiadakis, Nader A. Mousavi
  • Patent Local Rules--A Summary & Comparison
    Douglas R. Nemec
  • The Evolving Patent Marketplace: Ex Post Patent Transactions, The Evolving IP Marketplace: Aligning Patent Notice and Remedies with Competition, March 2011, Federal Trade Commission
    William E Cohen
  • The Invisible Hand: Monetizing Patents in the 21st Century
    Marc A. Ehrlich, Richard Ludwin
  • What Keeps In-House Counsel Up at Night?
    Scott M. Alter
  • Ethics and OED 2012: Practitioner Discipline at the USPTO
    Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.
  • Ethics and OED 2010: Practitioner Discipline at the USPTO
    Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.
  • Index to Patent Law Institute (7th Annual)

Presentation Material

  • PTO Update
    Brian Hanlon
  • Recent Cases
    Denise M. De Mory
  • Implementing the AIA Pre & Post-Grant, Part I: Derivation Proceedings, Third Party Submissions; Supplemental Examination
    Robert J. Spar
  • Managing Patent Litigation: Containing Costs and Maintaining Efficiency
    Cynthia Bright
  • Standards and Essential Patents
    Frances E. Marshall
  • Patent Damages - Keeping Up With The Changing Rules
    Dawn Hall, Kimberly N. Van Voorhis
  • Navigating The New Induced Infringement: Tips and Practical Consideration
    Scott M. Alter
  • Developments in Pharma and Biotech Patent Litigation
    Asim Bhansali
  • Implementing the AIA: First to File: The New 102 Timelines and Deadlines!
    Nicholas Godici
  • Implementing the AIA: First to File: The New 102 Timelines and Deadlines!
    Leonard Richard Svensson
  • Patent-Eligible Subject Matter: Implications for the Biotech, Medical Device and Software Industries
    Roberta Jean Hanson
  • Patent-Eligible Subject Matter: Implications for the Biotech, Medical Device and Software Industries
    Robert R. Sachs
  • Dialogue Between the Bench and the Bar
    Donald R. Dunner
  • Chemical/Pharma Cases and AIA Concerns; Bio Cases and AIA Concerns
    Leonard Richard Svensson
  • Joint Infringement post Akamai/McKesson  
    Daryl L. Joseffer, Alison M. Tucher
  • Hot Topics in Technology Transfer and Licensing
    Cheryl A. Fragiadakis, Nader A. Mousavi
  • Litigating Against Non-Practicing Entities
    Philip W. Marsh
  • Litigating Against Non-Practicing Entities
    Andrew N. Thomases
  • PTO Ethics and the AIA
    Eugene R. Quinn, Jr.
Co-Chair(s)
Scott M. Alter ~ Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Douglas R. Nemec ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
John M. White ~ Berenato & White, LLC; Director of Patent Professional Development, PLI,
Speaker(s)
T.J. Angioletti ~ Associate General Counsel, Technology & Transactions, Netflix
Kevin Barhydt ~ VP, Head of Acquisitions and Analysis, RPX Corporation
Asim Bhansali ~ Keker & Van Nest LLP
Cynthia Bright ~ IP Litigation Counsel, Hewlett Packard Co
Matthew J. Bye ~ Senior Competition Counsel, Google Inc.
Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley ~ Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of California
Donald R. Dunner ~ Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Joseph T. FitzGerald ~ Senior Vice President of Public and Legal Affairs, Symantec Corporation
Cheryl A. Fragiadakis ~ Technology Transfer Department Head, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Nicholas Godici ~ Executive Advisor, Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP
Dawn Hall ~ Managing Director - Forensic Consulting, FTI Consulting
Brian Hanlon ~ Director, Office of Patent Legal Administration, United States Patent and Trademark Office
Roberta Jean Hanson ~ Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Heath Hoglund ~ Chief Patent Counsel, Dolby
Daryl L. Joseffer ~ King & Spalding LLP
David Kaefer ~ General Manager, IP Licensing & Sales, Microsoft Corp
James A. Kovacs ~ , Deputy Director of Intel Licensing and Patent Acquisitions, Intel Corporation
Allen M. Lo ~ Deputy General Counsel, Google, Inc.
Ken Lustig ~ Vice President, Strategic Acquisitions, Divestitures and Client Engagement, Intellectual Ventures Management LLC
Philip W. Marsh ~ Agility IP Law
Frances E. Marshall ~ Special Counsel for Intellectual Property, Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice
Steven A. McAuley ~ Vice President & Chief Patent Counsel, CRV, Boston Scientific Corporation
Denise M. De Mory ~ Bunsow De Mory Smith & Allison LLP
Nader A. Mousavi ~ Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
Margaret M. Dunbar, M.S. ~ Senior Director, Intellectual Property and Legal Affairs, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute
Carter G. Phillips ~ Sidley Austin LLP
Eugene R. Quinn, Jr. ~ President and Founder, IPWatchdog.com, IPWatchdog, Inc.
Robert R. Sachs ~ Fenwick & West LLP
Hon. Patti B. Saris ~ District Judge, United States District Court, District of Massachusetts
Robert J. Spar ~ Patent Prosecution and Practice Specialist, Director (Ret.) OPLA, USPTO,
Leonard Richard Svensson ~ Birch, Stewart, Kolasch & Birch, LLP
Andrew N. Thomases ~ Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
Alison M. Tucher ~ Morrison & Foerster LLP
Kimberly N. Van Voorhis ~ Morrison & Foerster LLP
John M. Whealan ~ Intellectual Property Advisory Board Associate Dean for Intellectual Property Law Studies, George Washington University Law School

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina8, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.
Minnesota  approves live webcasts ONLY

The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.

1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Related Items

Live Seminars  Live Seminars

Patent Litigation 2013 (New York, NY) Nov. 11 - 12, 2013
Patent Litigation 2013 (Chicago, IL) Oct. 9 - 10, 2013
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2013 (San Francisco, CA) Jun. 5, 2013

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

Patent Litigation 2012 Oct. 12, 2012
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012 Jun. 20, 2012

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Patent Litigation 2013  
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2013 Ian N. Feinberg, Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP
Gary M. Hnath, Mayer Brown LLP
 
Patent Law Institute (7th Annual) Scott M. Alter, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Douglas R. Nemec, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
John M. White,
 
Patent Litigation 2012 Christopher K. Hu, Dickstein Shapiro LLP
Jeanne M. Gills, Foley & Lardner LLP
Edward G. Poplawski, Sidley Austin LLP
 
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012 Ian N. Feinberg, Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP
Gary M. Hnath, Mayer Brown LLP
 
Patent Law Institute (6th Annual) Scott M. Alter, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
Douglas R. Nemec, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
John M. White,
 
Print Share Email