On-Demand   Web Segment

International Litigation 2012

Recorded on: Jun. 18, 2012
Running Time: 01:13:21

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:29:43] Recent Developments [in International Litigation] Derek J.T. Adler ~ Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
Alexander Yanos ~ Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
Douglas W. Mateyaschuk ~ DLA Piper LLP (US)
Henry G. Burnett ~ King & Spalding LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:13:21] International Litigators Toolbox No. 1: When U.S. Discovery Rules Clash With Foreign Law (Including a Mock Argument Before District Court Judges) Laina C. Lopez ~ Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe LLP
Mark G. Hanchet ~ Mayer Brown LLP
Steven C. Bennett ~ Park Jensen Bennett LLP
Hon. Victor Marrero ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Hon. Robert M. Dow, Jr. ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:05] In-House Counsel's Perspective on Managing Global Litigation Stephen R. Reynolds ~ Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Alcatel-Lucent
Javier H. Rubinstein ~ Global General Counsel, PwC
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:26] Strategy in International Litigation John F. Baughman ~ Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
M. Christie Helmer ~ Miller Nash LLP
Nick Gray ~ Slaughter And May
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:04:42] International Litigators Toolbox No. 2: The Service of Process on Foreign Defendants and the Taking of Evidence in International Litigation John Fellas ~ Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP
David Zaslowsky ~ Baker & McKenzie LLP
Damien J. Byrne Hill ~ Herbert Smith LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
Taken from the Web Program International Litigation 2012 Recorded June 2012 in New York City

Lecture Topics


International Litigators Toolbox No. 1: When U.S. Discovery Rules Clash With Foreign Law (Including a Mock Argument Before District Court Judges)
[01:13:21]
  • Foreign privacy and confidentiality laws and regulations
  • Foreign blocking statutes
  • Strategies, doctrines and devices

The purchase price of this Web Program segment includes the following article from the Course Handbook available online:
  • Sedona Conference Issues International Principles on Discovery and Data Protection
    Steven C. Bennett
  • Practical Responses to the EU Privacy Versus U.S. Discovery Conflict
    Steven C. Bennett

Presentation Material


  • International Litigators Toolbox No. 1: When U.S. Discovery Rules Clash With Foreign Law (Including a Mock Argument Before District Court Judges)
    Steven C. Bennett
Speaker(s)
Steven C. Bennett ~ Park Jensen Bennett LLP
Hon. Robert M. Dow, Jr. ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois
Mark G. Hanchet ~ Mayer Brown LLP
Laina C. Lopez ~ Berliner, Corcoran & Rowe LLP
Hon. Victor Marrero ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the Credit Information box to the right of each product description for credit information specific to your state.


On-Demand Web Programs and Segments
 are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.


Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Related Items

Live Seminars  Live Seminars

International Arbitration 2015 (New York, NY) Jun. 10, 2015

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

International Arbitration 2014 Jun. 23, 2014

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

International Arbitration 2015  
International Arbitration 2014 John Fellas,
 
Print Share Email