On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Government Investigations 2013: The Role of Electronic Information in Investigation and Response

Released on: Apr. 18, 2013
Running Time: 03:08:20

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:07:55] The Scope of Government Investigations and Limits on Government Investigations David C. Shonka ~ Acting General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission
Sarah D. Himmelhoch ~ Senior Litigation Counsel for E-Discovery, Environment & Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice
Allison C. Stanton ~ Director of E-Discovery, Office of the Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice -- Civil Division
Kathleen T. Toomey ~ Deputy Director, Professional Development Office, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice
Valerie Szczepanik ~ Assistant Director, Asset Management Unit, Division of Enforcement, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Ronald J. Hedges ~ Former United States Magistrate Judge, Ronald J. Hedges, LLC
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[02:00:25] Responding to Government Requests for ESI: Providing Information, Handling the Investigation, and Ending the Case David C. Shonka ~ Acting General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission
Manfred J. Gabriel ~ Principal, KPMG LLP/Forensic Technology Services
Maura R. Grossman ~ Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
Ronald J. Hedges ~ Former United States Magistrate Judge, Ronald J. Hedges, LLC
Peter C. Harvey ~ Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Hon. John M. Facciola ~ Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Justin P. Murphy ~ Crowell & Moring LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
Organizations create and store a growing volume of information on a daily basis. That information is used in all facets of an organization’s business. When government regulators seek access to that information, many questions can arise. Exactly what information might the government seek? What limits, if any, are there on the government’s request for electronically stored information? How might electronic information be reviewed prior to production and, when the review is completed, how might that information be produced? How are privileges and confidential information protected during an investigation? How can an organization negotiate effectively with the government over the production of electronic information?

Our faculty, which includes judges, regulators, and counsel experienced in government investigations, will answer these questions as they address the cutting-edge issues involved in how the government may seek, produce, and use electronic information in investigations.

Lecture Topics 
[Total time 03:08:20]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • The Scope of Government Investigations and Limits on Government Investigations [01:07:55]
    David C. Shonka, Sarah D. Himmelhoch, Valerie Szczepanik, Allison C. Stanton, Kathleen T. Toomey, Ronald J. Hedges
  • Responding to Government Requests for ESI: Providing Information, Handling the Investigation, and Ending the Case [02:00:25]
    Hon. John M. Facciola, Maura R. Grossman, Justin P. Murphy, Manfred J. Gabriel, David C. Shonka, Peter C. Harvey, Ronald J. Hedges

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • Navigating Government Civil Law Enforcement Investigations
    David C. Shonka
  • Government Investigations and ESI: Relevant Case Law
    Ronald J. Hedges
  • Social Media Evidence in Criminal Proceedings: An Uncertain Frontier
    Justin P. Murphy
  • Selected Regulations and Sample Forms
    Ronald J. Hedges
  • Regulations and Agency Guidance
    Ronald J. Hedges
  • Index to Government Investigations 2013
Chairperson(s)
Ronald J. Hedges ~ Former United States Magistrate Judge, Ronald J. Hedges, LLC
Speaker(s)
Hon. John M. Facciola ~ Magistrate Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Manfred J. Gabriel ~ Principal, KPMG LLP/Forensic Technology Services
Maura R. Grossman ~ Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz
Peter C. Harvey ~ Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
Sarah D. Himmelhoch ~ Senior Litigation Counsel for E-Discovery, Environment & Natural Resources Division, U.S. Department of Justice
Justin P. Murphy ~ Crowell & Moring LLP
David C. Shonka ~ Acting General Counsel, Federal Trade Commission
Allison C. Stanton ~ Director of E-Discovery, Office of the Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice -- Civil Division
Valerie Szczepanik ~ Assistant Director, Asset Management Unit, Division of Enforcement, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Kathleen T. Toomey ~ Deputy Director, Professional Development Office, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota 
approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Print Share Email