On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Expert Witness 2015

Released on: Jul. 13, 2015
Running Time: 03:16:49

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[00:59:04] Role of Expert Witnesses in Complex Litigation Blair G Connelly ~ Latham & Watkins LLP
Daniel L Berger ~ Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
Paul Hinton ~ Principal, The Brattle Group
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:01:35] Expert Reports and Depositions Edward H Rosenthal ~ Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, PC
Mary Gail Gearns ~ Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Faten Sabry ~ Senior Vice President, Ph.D., Bankruptcy Practice Chair, NERA Economic Consulting
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:58:48] Expert Witnesses at Trial Hon. Vincent L Briccetti ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Kenneth I Schacter ~ Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Linda C Imes ~ Spears and Imes LLP
William A Isaacson ~ Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4

For many attorneys, searching for, retaining, and using expert witnesses can be a daunting experience. Don't miss out on the critical benefits conferred by the effective use of expert witnesses in complex litigation.  Our faculty of experienced litigators and expert witnesses will demystify the challenges of selecting, preparing, and using experts. You will come away with practical tools to handle the myriad of issues involved with expert witness preparation and testimony.

Litigators at all levels of practice and experience should find this program useful.  In-house counsel who are involved in or supervise litigation will also find this program of interest.


Lecture Topics [Total time 03:16:49]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.


  • Opening Remarks and Introduction* [00:17:22]
    Kenneth I. Schacter
  • Role of Expert Witnesses in Complex Litigation [00:59:04]
    Daniel L. Berger, Blair G. Connelly, Paul Hinton
  • Expert Reports and Depositions [01:01:35]
    Mary Gail Gearns, Edward H. Rosenthal, Faten Sabry
  • Expert Witnesses at Trial [00:58:48]
    Hon. Vincent L. Briccetti, Linda C. Imes, Kenneth I. Schacter, William A. Isaacson

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:


  • Examination of Expert Witnesses at Trial
    Blair G. Connelly, David M. Cohen, Kenneth I. Schacter
  • Proving Causation Through Expert Witnesses in Complex Litigation (March 6, 2015)
    Celeste R. Coco-Ewing
  • Be an Expert in Working with Economic Experts, The Civil Practice & Procedure Committee’s Young Lawyers Advisory Panel: Perspectives in Antitrust, Section of Antitrust Law, Vol. 3, No. 3 (December 16, 2014)
    Paul Hinton, Andrew E. Abere, Michelle A. Cleary
  • Defending an Expert Deposition
    Mary Gail Gearns, Kenneth I. Schacter
  • Daubert and the Discounted Cash Flow Method
    Kenneth I. Schacter, Richard Taffet, Allan Swisher
  • Expert Q&A on Trends in Daubert Challenges
    Mary Gail Gearns, Kenneth I. Schacter
  • Expert Disclosure Obligations and Protections Under Rule 26
    Edward H. Rosenthal
  • The Use of Expert Testimony to Determine Materiality (April 17, 2015)
    Linda C. Imes, Alicia K. Amdur
  • Impact of the 2010 Amendments to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 on Privileges Applicable to Consulting, Reporting and Dual Capacity Experts (April 17, 2015)
    Linda C. Imes, Alicia K. Amdur

Presentation Material


  • Role of Expert Witnesses in Complex Litigation
    Daniel L. Berger, Blair G. Connelly, Marcy R. Harris, Paul Hinton
  • Depositions of Expert Witnesses
    Mary Gail Gearns
  • Expert Reports and Depositions
    Faten Sabry
  • Expert Witnesses and Reports
    Edward H. Rosenthal
Chairperson(s)
Kenneth I. Schacter ~ Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Speaker(s)
Daniel L. Berger ~ Grant & Eisenhofer P.A.
Hon. Vincent L. Briccetti ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Blair G. Connelly ~ Latham & Watkins LLP
Mary Gail Gearns ~ Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Marcy Ressler Harris ~ Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
Paul Hinton ~ Principal, The Brattle Group
Linda Imes ~ Spears and Imes LLP
William A. Isaacson ~ Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
Edward H. Rosenthal ~ Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz, PC
Faten Sabry ~ Senior Vice President, Ph.D., Bankruptcy Practice Chair, NERA Economic Consulting
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-traditional” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of non-traditional programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-traditional” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of non-traditional programs per reporting period.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 3 on-demand credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “A/V” credit. Attorneys are limited to 22.5 credits of A/V programs per reporting period.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as “QAS Self-Study” credit. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at cleadministrator@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at cleadministrator@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

IIEI Recertification:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may qualify for the Continuing Education Units (CEUs) necessary to fulfill the Certified U.S. Export Compliance Officer® (CUSECO) continuing education requirements.

 

Related Items

Live Seminars  Live Seminars

Expert Witness 2017 (New York, NY) Jun. 13, 2017

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

Expert Witness 2016 Jul. 28, 2016

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Expert Witness 2017  
Expert Witness 2016 Kenneth I Schacter, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
 
Expert Witness 2015 Kenneth I Schacter, Morgan Lewis & Bockius LLP
 
Print Share Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • GooglePlus
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2016 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.