On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Current Developments in Federal Civil Practice 2016

Released on: Mar. 1, 2016
Running Time: 06:15:11

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:04:11] Motion Practice Developments Sandra S Park ~ Senior Staff Attorney, American Civil Liberties Union
Hon. Cheryl L Pollak ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Hon. Stephen C Robinson (Ret.) ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Hon. James L Cott ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:06:02] Discovery and the Federal Rules Hon. Cheryl L Pollak ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Hon. Stephen C Robinson (Ret.) ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Scott Brown ~ Stroz Friedberg LLC
Hon. James L Cott ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:59:26] Evidence Update Hon. Cheryl L Pollak ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Jacob Hollinger ~ McDermott Will & Emery LLP
Hon. Stephen C Robinson (Ret.) ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Hon. James L Cott ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:02:54] Trial Issues Gregory P Joseph ~ Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC
Jonathan L Frank ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Hon. Stephen C Robinson (Ret.) ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Hon. Steven I Locke ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:57:27] Ethics Update Gregory P Joseph ~ Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC
Jonathan L Frank ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Hon. Stephen C Robinson (Ret.) ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Hon. Steven I Locke ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Jennifer A Paradise ~ General Counsel, White & Case LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:03:40] Case Law Developments Gregory P Joseph ~ Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC
Jonathan L Frank ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Hon. Stephen C Robinson (Ret.) ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Hon. Steven I Locke ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
On-Demand MP3 MP4

Are you up-to-date on the important developments in federal civil practice and the implications of these developments for your cases? At Current Developments in Federal Civil Practice 2016, a distinguished faculty of trial lawyers and judges will review and offer their insights into significant recent developments, including the new amendments to the Federal Rules which took effect on December 1, 2015. The program will focus on the practical application of these developments for best pretrial and trial practices.

This program will be helpful both to the new lawyer who needs to learn the federal rules, as well as the experienced trial attorney who needs an update on the most recent federal issues and decisions.


Lecture Topics [Total time 06:15:11]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.


  • Introduction* [00:01:31]
    Jonathan L. Frank
  • Motion Practice Developments [01:04:11]
    Sandra S. Park, Hon. James L. Cott, Hon. Cheryl L. Pollak, Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Ret.)
  • Discovery and the Federal Rules [01:06:02]
    Scott Brown, Hon. James L. Cott, Hon. Cheryl L. Pollak, Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Ret.)
  • Evidence Update [00:59:26]
    Jacob Hollinger, Hon. Cheryl L. Pollak, Hon. James L. Cott, Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Ret.)
  • Trial Issues [01:02:54]
    Gregory P. Joseph, Hon. Steven I. Locke, Jonathan L. Frank, Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Ret.)
  • Ethics Update [00:57:27]
    Jennifer A. Paradise, Hon. Steven I. Locke, Gregory P. Joseph, Jonathan L. Frank, Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Ret.)
  • Case Law Developments [01:03:40]
    Jonathan L. Frank, Hon. Steven I. Locke, Gregory P. Joseph, Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Ret.)

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:


  • COMPLETE COURSE HANDBOOK
  • Motion Practice Developments and Update
    Sandra S. Park
  • Select E-Discovery Cases from 2015
    Scott Brown
  • Evidence Update—December 2015
    Jacob Hollinger
  • Important Case Law Developments in Civil Practice
    Jonathan L. Frank, Lauren E. Aguiar
  • Professional Responsibility Developments in Federal Civil Practice
    Jennifer A. Paradise
  • What Every Judge and Lawyer Needs to Know About Electronic Evidence: Authentication
    Gregory P. Joseph
  • New Law of Electronic Spoliation—Rule 37(e)
    Gregory P. Joseph

Presentation Material


  • Motion Practice Developments
    Sandra S. Park
  • Current Developments in Federal Civil Practice: Discovery and the Federal Rules
    Scott Brown
  • Evidence Update
    Jacob Hollinger
  • Trial Issues
    Gregory P. Joseph
  • Trial Issues
    Gregory P. Joseph
  • Developments in Federal Civil Practice
    Jennifer A. Paradise
  • Developments in Federal Civil Practice
    Jennifer A. Paradise
  • Developments in Federal Civil Practice
    Jennifer A. Paradise
  • Case Law Developements
    Jonathan L. Frank, Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Ret.)
  • Case Law Developments
    Jonathan L. Frank, Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Ret.)
Chairperson(s)
Jonathan L. Frank ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Speaker(s)
Scott Brown ~ Stroz Friedberg LLC
Hon. James L. Cott ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Jacob Hollinger ~ McDermott Will & Emery LLP
Gregory P. Joseph ~ Joseph Hage Aaronson LLC
Hon. Steven I. Locke ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Jennifer A. Paradise ~ General Counsel, White & Case LLP
Sandra S. Park ~ Senior Staff Attorney, American Civil Liberties Union
Hon. Cheryl L. Pollak ~ United States Magistrate Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Hon. Stephen C. Robinson (Ret.) ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-traditional” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of non-traditional programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s transitional on-demand web programs can be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys. Only professional practice and law practice management credits may be earned via transitional on-demand web programs. Ethics and skills credits may not be earned via on-demand web programs.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “non-traditional” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of non-traditional programs per reporting period.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 3 on-demand credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “A/V” credit. Attorneys are limited to 22.5 credits of A/V programs per reporting period.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand web programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.


CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand web programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.


Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand web programs qualify as “QAS Self-Study” credit. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at cleadministrator@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at cleadministrator@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand web programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

Compliance Certification Board (CCB):  PLI’s on-demand web programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Candidates are limited to 10 self-study credits per 12-month period, and certification holders are limited to 20 self-study credits per 2-year renewal period.

IIEI Recertification:  PLI’s on-demand web programs may qualify for the Continuing Education Units (CEUs) necessary to fulfill the Certified U.S. Export Compliance Officer® (CUSECO) continuing education requirements.

 

Related Items

Live Seminars  Live Seminars

Current Developments in Federal Civil Practice 2017 (New York, NY) Feb. 16, 2017

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Current Developments in Federal Civil Practice 2017  
Current Developments in Federal Civil Practice 2016 Jonathan L Frank, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
 
Print Share Email
"Terrific program. Erudite and insightful presenters."
- 2015 Webcast Attendee

"The jurists were terrific. Very practical viewpoint."
- 2015 Attendee

"The presenters were excellent and the presentation was very interesting."
- 2015 Webcast Attendee


  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • GooglePlus
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2016 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.