On-Demand   Web Segment

California Eviction Defense: Protecting Low-Income Tenants 2013 (Free)

Recorded on: Mar. 14, 2013
Running Time: 01:00:50

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:00:50] Fee Waivers, Requests for Jury Trials, and Appellate Division Writs Christian Abasto ~ Director of Litigation, Public Law Center
Phong S Wong ~ Pro Bono Director, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles
On-Demand MP3 MP4
Taken from the Web Program California Eviction Defense: Protecting Low-Income Tenants 2013 recorded March, 2013 in San Francisco.

Lecture Topics  [01:00:50]

Fee Waivers, Requests for Jury Trials, and Appellate Division Writs 
[01:00:50]

This section will address how pro bono and legal services attorneys can get court fees waived and recoup certain transcript costs on behalf of their indigent clients. The session also will focus on successful jury trial and writ practice in unlawful detainer actions.

The purchase price of this segment includes the following article from the Course Handbook available online:
  • Government Code Sections 68630-68641
    Phong S. Wong
  • California Rules of Court, Rules 3.50-3.58
    Phong S. Wong
  • Sample FW-001 Request to Waive Court Fees; FW-003 Order on Court Fee Waiver
    Phong S. Wong
  • Fee Waiver Process Flowchart
    Phong S. Wong
  • What to Do When a Fee Waiver Application Is Denied
    Phong S. Wong
  • Increasing Court Access Through Fee-Waiver Reform: California's Model, Clearinghouse Review Journal of Poverty Law and Policy, July-August 2009, Volume 43, Numbers 3-4
    Phong S. Wong, Richard Rothschild
  • Sample Demand for Jury Trial
    Phong S. Wong
  • Sample Statement of the Case
    Phong S. Wong
  • Sample Defendants' Proposed Jury Instructions
    Phong S. Wong
  • Sample Defendant's Proposed Special Verdict Form
    Phong S. Wong
  • Sample Defendants' Proposed Exhibit List
    Phong S. Wong
  • Sample Defendants' Proposed Witness List
    Phong S. Wong
  • Sample Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
    Christian Abasto
  • Sample Applications for Ex Parte Order Temporarily Staying Execution of Judgment Pending Determination of Petition for Writ of Supersedeas; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declarations in Support Thereof
    Christian Abasto
  • Sample Notice of Petition and Petition for Stay of the Judgment Pending Appeal; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Declarations of Deana Tenant and Gary Doctor, M.D.; Proposed Order (Filed Concurrently)
    Christian Abasto
  • Sample Stay Requested; Petition for Writ of Supersedeas or Other Appropriate Stay Order; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Supporting Declarations and Verification
    Christian Abasto
  • Sample Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Injunction; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof
    Christian Abasto
  • Fee Waivers, Requests for Jury Trials, and Appellate Division Writs (Powerpoint Slides)
    Phong S. Wong, Christian Abasto

Presentation Material

  • Fee Waivers, Requests for Jury Trials, and Appellate Division Writs
    Phong S. Wong, Christian Abasto
Speaker(s)
Christian Abasto ~ Director of Litigation, Public Law Center
Phong S Wong ~ Pro Bono Director, Legal Aid Foundation of Los Angeles

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the Credit Information box to the right of each product description for credit information specific to your state.


On-Demand Web Programs and Segments
 are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.


Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Related Items

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

California Eviction Defense: Protecting Low-Income Tenants 2014 (Free) Mar. 26, 2014

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

California Eviction Defense: Protecting Low-Income Tenants 2014 S. L Martinez, Western Center on Law & Poverty
 
Print Share Email