On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Advanced Copyright Law Annual Review 2014

Released on: Apr. 18, 2014
Running Time: 05:58:28

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:02:04] The First Sale Doctrine: Implications for Digital Rights in Print and Music Lisa T. Simpson ~ Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:57:09] Fair Use and Transformativeness Kim J. Landsman ~ Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:55:56] Current Statutory Termination Issues in Print and Music Jessica R. Friedman ~ Attorney at Law
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:58:30] Internet Piracy Developments Ed McCoyd ~ Executive Director for Digital, Environmental & Accessibility Affairs, Association of American Publishers
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:02:58] Public Performance Rights in the Digital Age Lateef Mtima ~ Professor of Law and Director, Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice, Howard University School of Law
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:57:18] Key Copyright Litigation Issues Nancy J. Mertzel ~ Schoeman Updike Kaufman Stern & Ascher LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4

Copyright law has become an increasingly complex area in the face of new technologies and new ways of doing business. To help you keep up-to-date and provide the sophisticated, pragmatic legal advice your clients expect, PLI has brought together a group of leading experts on copyright law. The speakers in this advanced seminar will address critical issues in copyright law, drawing on their extensive experience and judgment. Current issues will be examined in the context of developed law and proposals and prospects for future change. Important litigation and licensing issues will be reviewed, as well as the impact of new technology, fair use developments, and other major issues.

Lecture Topics 
[Total time 05:58:28]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Introduction* [00:04:33]
    Richard Dannay
  • The First Sale Doctrine: Implications for Digital Rights in Print and Music [01:02:04]
    Lisa T. Simpson
  • Fair Use and Transformativeness [00:57:09]
    Kim J. Landsman
  • Current Statutory Termination Issues in Print and Music [00:55:56]
    Jessica R. Friedman
  • Internet Piracy Developments [00:58:30]
    Ed McCoyd
  • Public Performance Rights in the Digital Age [01:02:58]
    Lateef Mtima
  • Key Copyright Litigation Issues [00:57:18]
    Nancy J. Mertzel

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • Copyright Injunctions and Fair Use: Enter eBay—Four-Factor Fatigue or Four-Factor Freedom?
    Richard Dannay
  • Factorless Fair Use? Was Melville Nimmer Right?
    Richard Dannay
  • The First Sale Doctrine: Implications for Digital Rights in Print and Music
    Lisa T. Simpson
  • Does Cariou v. Prince Represent the Apogee or Burn-out of Transformativeness in Fair Use Jurisprudence? A Plea for a Neo-Traditional Approach
    Kim J. Landsman
  • Current Statutory Termination Issues in Print and Music
    Jessica R. Friedman
  • The “Disquieter” Doctrine: German Law and Responsibilities of File-Sharing Websites
    Ed McCoyd
  • The Eye of the Beholder: Applying Copyright Law to DVR Technology
    Lateef Mtima
  • Key Copyright Litigation Issues
    Nancy J. Mertzel

Presentation Material

  • The First Sale Doctrine: Implications for Digital Rights in Print and Music
    Lisa T. Simpson
  • Fair Use and Transformativeness
    Kim J. Landsman
  • Current Statutory Termination Issues in Print and Music
    Jessica R. Friedman
  • Internet Piracy Developments
    Ed McCoyd
Chairperson(s)
Richard Dannay ~ Past President, The Copyright Society of the U.S.A., Cowan, Liebowitz & Latman, P.C.
Speaker(s)
Jessica R. Friedman ~ Attorney at Law
Kim J. Landsman ~ Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP
Ed McCoyd ~ Executive Director for Digital, Environmental & Accessibility Affairs, Association of American Publishers
Nancy J. Mertzel ~ Schoeman Updike Kaufman Stern & Ascher LLP
Lateef Mtima ~ Professor of Law and Director, Institute for Intellectual Property and Social Justice, Howard University School of Law
Lisa T. Simpson ~ Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the Credit Information box to the right of each product description for credit information specific to your state.


On-Demand Web Programs and Segments
 are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.


Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Print Share Email