On-Demand Learning

Patent

Recorded on: Jun. 7, 2012

IAN N. FEINBERG: I'm going to begin by introducing the first two speakers, one of them is not yet on the dias here. But he will come in at 10:00. I'm going to do it this way, because there isn't actually a break between the first two sessions. We go right from the first to the second. The break follows the second. The first speaker, who will talk to us on elements and burdens in a patent infringement case, is my partner, Elizabeth Day. Elizabeth ...

Recorded on: Jun. 6, 2013

SPEAKER 1: All right, now. JOSHUA M. MASUR: OK. Actually, it's funny because I think the reason that I'm here is that I'm one of the few people who, when they're told they are being asked to talk about complaints and answers for an hour, says only an hour? And in fact, it looks like I'm going to get a little more than an hour with you. So that will be even more fun. And I think we're going to continue the tradition that we've started already of ...

Recorded on: Feb. 9, 2012

GERALD M. MURPHY, JR.: OK, you hesitated, you lost. The next speaker is Barbara Mullin, and she's a partner in the Philadelphia office of Akin Gump. In terms of her background, she tries cases regularly in federal courts and arbitration panels and has argued before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. Her cases have involved diverse technological fields such as recombinant antibodies, medical devices and methods, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductor ...

Recorded on: Jan. 11, 2011

SPEAKER 1: All right. Welcome back. Last hour session here. The last session hit on this afternoon is on ethical considerations of reissue and ex parte and inter pates reexamination. So this gets you your one hour of CLE credits for ethics. And pleased to have Joanne Kim for this presentation. She's a partner-- OK, she's a partner at Akin Gump-- and for the rest of it, I have to put on my reading glasses here, I'm afraid. All right. So she represents ...

Recorded on: Sep. 28, 2012

SPEAKER 1: That is ethical issues in patent litigation. And our presenter today is John Steele, who is a returning presenter to us. John is a real man of steel because he always presents at 4 o'clock on the second day, which is the last presentation, and he does an excellent job. John's practice emphasizes legal ethics, the law of lawyering, and risk management, and he offers counseling opinion letters in expert witness engagements. He's taught approximately ...

Recorded on: Mar. 5, 2012

SPEAKER 1: And I suspect that the person that normally introduces our next panelist is not here, so perhaps I need to do that. This is the ethics panel, and I am quite pleased to be introducing Ken Brothers, who was a classmate of mine from GW Law School. Currently, Ken is a partner in the IP practice of Dickstein Shapiro in the Washington, D.C. office, and focuses his practice on IP trial and appellate litigation. KENNETH BROTHERS: This is the last ...

Recorded on: Feb. 24, 2011

JOHN M. WHITE: This is our last speaker of the day. And it's really the hour you've all been waiting for. These past few days, you sat patiently. Here it is. Ethics. That's right. It's the reason you go to any of these programs. It's the critical ethics hour. And it's because, truthfully, you all need it. No, actually, patent attorneys are the most ethical of any group of attorneys. In fact, thery're somewhat boringly ethical. But the reason I asked ...

Released on: May. 9, 2013

Taken from the briefing Europe's New Unitary Patent Regime: One Patent, One Court recorded April, 2013.Now that 24 EU member states have signed an international treaty establishing a European unified patent court, Europe’s dream of a unified patent system is moving closer to reality. If enough participating states ratify the agreement, the EU will get a new Unitary Patent right - taking effect via a single application throughout most of the EU - and ...

Recorded on: Jan. 11, 2011

SCOTT MCKEOWN: I'd like to introduce the first speaker who will speak on ex parte patent reexamination and patent reissue. The first speaker is Todd Baker, my partner at Oblon, Spivak. I should know Todd's background pretty well, but I'm going to read it anyway. Todd is also an attorney in our patent reexamine reissue group. Todd handles, much like myself, post grant proceedings handled at the PTO, unlike me he is also a specialist in interference ...

Recorded on: Sep. 28, 2012

EDWARD POPLAWSKI: Our next topic will be a mock expert direct and cross examination, and we have three participants. And in addition, I will serve as the preeminent jurist in this mock exercise. So to my right, first of all, is Andrea Weiss Jeffries. Andrea is a partner in Wilmer Hale's Los Angeles office with it's Litigation Controversy Department, and she's a member of the Intellectual Property Litigation Practice Group. She specializes primarily ...

Recorded on: Jan. 9, 2012

RICHARD RAYSMAN: My panel, the first panel, was the causes of license disputes. So the next panel is the next step, the fault lines in licensing agreements. Really, if it starts to fall apart what kinds of actions, what are the issues involved with that? The two speakers today on our next panel are Aaron Rubin. Aaron is counsel in the San Francisco office of Morrison and Foerster and a member of the firm's Technology Transactions Group. His practice ...

Recorded on: Apr. 10, 2013

Taken from the briefing Foreign Filing Best Practices: An Update on the Patent Cooperation Treaty recorded April, 2013.With today’s global industries and markets, foreign patent protection is an essential part of IP strategy. Since entering force in 1978, the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) has been a popular route for applicants acquiring patent rights in different countries because of the distinct advantages that the PCT offers versus ...

Recorded on: Jan. 9, 2012

GRANT KIM: That [? GN ?] is kind of tricky. RICHARD RAYSMAN: OK. Well, welcome back after our short break. And this is our final session in this program. And the session is on formal dispute resolution. What happens if any of these negotiations don't work trying to get a resolution and a licensing dispute goes to either suit or arbitration. We have two speakers. One of the speakers is Grant Kim, who's counsel to Morrison & Foerster. Grant has ...

Recorded on: May. 17, 2013

MARC ROTH: We'd like to invite everyone to please come back into the room. We'd like to get started for the afternoon session. We have two more panels this afternoon, and we're very excited about them. PETER BROWN: Three. Total of three. MARC ROTH: Three. Sorry. Three. So if everyone can please make their way back into the room it'd be much appreciated. OK. We can just get started. Our next session is actually one of the more interesting sessions ...

Recorded on: May. 17, 2013

Taken from the Web Program Information Technology Law Institute 2013: Privacy and Cybersecurity, Mobile Advertising, Digital Distribution, Social Media and the Third Industrial Revolution Recorded May, 2013 in San FranciscoHow Technology Is Creating the Third Industrial Revolution and Techniques to Finance New Businesses [00:59:29] The transformative potential of goods created with 3D printers Using technology to "print" samples, custom goods ...

Recorded on: Jul. 6, 2011

THOMAS L. CREEL: I might also say, those of you on the webcast, if you want to send questions in, please do. You can do that on the computer, and we'll answer them at an appropriate time here. So we now move from the preparation to the actual hearing itself. And it's our privilege to have Drew Wintringham here to discuss that, The Markman Hearing, Practical Tips and Strategies. Drew is a partner at DLA Piper, here in New York. He has a degree from ...

Recorded on: Apr. 13, 2012

ANNOUNCER: Give me a moment. I need my notes. So as I mentioned earlier, this segment we've got two presenters. And they are presenting on patent law developments. We have Victoria Maroulis. Victoria is a partner in the Silicon Valley office of Quinn Emanuel. And is co-chair of the firm's national life sciences practice. Her practice primarily focuses on IP litigation. And she has litigated and provided counseling for companies on a broad range of ...

Recorded on: Apr. 2, 2013

DAVID BARR: Everyone just a brief change in our schedule. We're going to be going forward with the in-house panel on pharma and biotech litigation for the 3:00 slot. And the panel on biotech and pharma licensing in Asia will take place at 4:00. So same subject matter, just flipping those two panels. So we're pleased and privileged to have today with us three in-house counsel to discuss a lot of the issues-- maybe in more depth than we were discussing ...

Recorded on: Jun. 6, 2013

Taken from the briefing Industrial Design, User Experience, and Maximizing Patent Protection recorded June, 2013.Innovations in product form and user interactivity is front-and-center in many of today’s R&D organizations.  More and more, attorneys are being challenged with protecting the user experience that sometimes transcends the individual elements of an invention.  In this session we explore how the user experience and ...

Recorded on: Sep. 28, 2012

SPEAKER 1:Well, good afternoon. We're ready to get started. Our next topic is infringement based on the acts of multiple parties. And our speaker on this topic is my colleague and former partner, Denise McKinsey. And Denise is with the Los Angeles office of Kirkland and Ellis, where she predominantly specializes in patent litigation. Among her accomplishments were being part of the Cornell University verses HP trial team on behalf of Cornell. And ...

Recorded on: Jan. 11, 2011

SCOTT: So we've got nothing coming in from the web. There's no more questions here. So I won't I spend too much time introducing Len. You've heard about him this morning. He's a partner at Birch Stewart specializing in the biotechnology and chemical group. He's based here in San Diego. Birch Stewart also has an office in DC. So Len's an OK guy, as far as us DC guys are concerned. But Len's going to talk about Inter Partes Reexamination Proceedings ...

Recorded on: Oct. 23, 2012

JOE YANG: So we're down to the ninth inning here. At this point, we have Anthony Greene joining us from New York. I hope you all-- when will they get to see him on the screen? SPEAKER 2: Should be coming up. JOE YANG: OK, so Anthony Greene will be joining us for the last segment of our program today. Anthony is a senior vice president at Herbert L. Jamison Company LLC, which has offices in New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Washington. He's ...

From the program: IP Enforcement and Litigation 2013: Criminal and Civil Update

Recorded on: Feb. 12, 2013

Taken from the Web Program IP Enforcement and Litigation 2013: Criminal and Civil Update recorded February, 2013 in New York. Lecture Topics  [01:02:00] Patent Enforcement Update  [01:02:00] The impact of new patent legislation on patent litigation Patent case law trends When and how to use ITC proceedings for patent or other IP enforcement Update on Proposed Amendments to ITC Rules of Practice and Procedure The ...

From the program: IP Issues in Business Transactions 2013

Released on: Mar. 12, 2013

This comprehensive program will provide an in-depth understanding of intellectual property issues that arise in corporate transactions, including the strategic role of intellectual property in a company and the many unique considerations that come into play. Learn how to assess intellectual property as a strategic asset and how to evaluate opportunities to monetize IP while avoiding costly missteps. Other essential topics addressed include IP portfolio ...

Recorded on: Mar. 20, 2013

DOUGLAS NEMEC: Welcome back, everybody. We'll get started with the first plenary session of the day. We're going to spend the next hour talking about litigation involving non-practicing entities, or patent-assertion entities, or patent trolls-- whatever term you prefer. When I started practicing-- it really wasn't all that long ago, in the 1990s-- these terms really didn't exist. Patent troll was a really unattractive patent lawyer, and a non-practicing ...