On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Trade Secrets 2013: What Every IP Attorney Should Know

Released on: Feb. 26, 2013
Running Time: 06:12:55

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:03:59] Trade Secrets Crash Course Prof. Sharon K. Sandeen ~ Hamline Law School
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:58:21] Protecting Your Client's Secrets David Klausner ~ Independent Computer Expert and Consultant, David Klausner, Inc., and Soflit
David E. Garrett ~ Managing Director, Stroz Friedberg
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:59:28] Litigation: When to File and What to Expect P. Anthony Sammi ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:02:34] Trade Secret Litigation Panel Hon. James P. Kleinberg ~ Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
Victoria A. Cundiff ~ Paul Hastings LLP
Allen J. Ruby ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Honorable James Ware ~ Mediator, Arbitrator, and Special Master, JAMS
Hon. Faith S. Hochberg ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, District of New Jersey
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:57:23] Controlling Costs in Litigation: Experts and Damages Panel Daniel L. Jackson ~ Managing Partner, AlixPartners
Christopher P. Gerardi ~ Senior Managing Director, FTI Consulting, Inc.
Daniel Cooper ~ President, LitStrat Inc.
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:01:52] Best Practices at Home and Abroad Panel Kathryn Rorem Coburn ~ Cooke Kobrick & Wu LLP
Prof. Sharon K. Sandeen ~ Hamline Law School
Laura Wen-yu Young ~ Wang & Wang, LLP
Stephen F. Lapham ~ Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel, Viewpointe
Bernard C. Shek ~ Senior Director, Litigation, SanDisk Corporation
On-Demand MP3 MP4

The "Big Three" categories of intellectual property are patents, copyrights and trademarks, but just as valuable is the fourth category of trade secrets.  If you work at a technology company or other company that creates or works with industry trade secrets - or if you counsel such a company - this course will teach you what you need to know to protect your valuable assets.

Lecture Topics  [Total time 06:12:55]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Program Overview* [00:09:18]
    P. Anthony Sammi
  • Trade Secrets Crash Course [01:03:59]
    Prof. Sharon K. Sandeen
  • Protecting Your Client's Secrets [00:58:21]
    David Klausner, David E. Garrett
  • Litigation: When to File and What to Expect [00:59:28]
    P. Anthony Sammi
  • Trade Secret Litigation Panel [01:02:34]
    Hon. Faith S. Hochberg, Allen J. Ruby, Hon. James Ware, Victoria A. Cundiff, Hon. James P. Kleinberg
  • Controlling Costs in Litigation: Experts and Damages Panel [00:57:23]
    Daniel Cooper, Christopher P. Gerardi, Daniel L. Jackson
  • Best Practices at Home and Abroad Panel [01:01:52]
    Prof. Sharon K. Sandeen, Stephen F. Lapham, Bernard C. Shek, Laura Wen-yu Young, Kathryn Rorem Coburn

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • The Evolution of Trade Secret Law and Why Courts Commit Error When They Do Not Follow the Uniform Trade Secrets Act, 33 Hamline L. Rev. 493 (2010)
    Prof. Sharon K. Sandeen
  • Data Security and the Human Factor
    David Klausner
  • Identifying and Disclosing Trade Secrets and Wrongful Conduct in Litigation: A Balancing Act
    P. Anthony Sammi
  • Knowing What to Ask for Can Help you Get It: How Advocates Can Work with Courts to Tailor Case-Specific Procedures and Remedies to Trade Secrets Disputes
    Victoria A. Cundiff
  • Juror Decision-Making Biases in Trade Secret Litigation
    Daniel Cooper
  • Trade Secret Damages--An Overview
    Christopher P. Gerardi, Daniel L. Jackson
  • Protecting Trade Secrets in China
    Laura Wen-yu Young
  • Index to Trade Secrets 2013

Presentation Material

  • Trade Secrets Crash Course
    Prof. Sharon K. Sandeen
  • Protecting Your Client's Secrets
    David Klausner, David E. Garrett
  • Litigation: When to File and What to Expect
    P. Anthony Sammi
  • Controlling Costs in Litigation: Experts and Damages Panel
    Daniel Cooper
  • Controlling Costs in Litigation: Experts and Damages Panel
    Christopher P. Gerardi
  • Best Practices at Home and Abroad Panel
    Laura Wen-yu Young
Chairperson(s)
P. Anthony Sammi ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Speaker(s)
Kathryn Rorem Coburn ~ Cooke Kobrick & Wu LLP
Daniel Cooper ~ President, LitStrat Inc.
Victoria A. Cundiff ~ Paul Hastings LLP
David E. Garrett ~ Managing Director, Stroz Friedberg
Christopher P. Gerardi ~ Senior Managing Director, FTI Consulting, Inc.
Hon. Faith S. Hochberg ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, District of New Jersey
Daniel L. Jackson ~ Managing Partner, AlixPartners
David Klausner ~ Independent Computer Expert and Consultant, David Klausner, Inc., and Soflit
Hon. James P. Kleinberg ~ Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara
Stephen F. Lapham ~ Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel, Viewpointe
Allen J. Ruby ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Prof. Sharon K. Sandeen ~ Hamline Law School
Bernard C. Shek ~ Senior Director, Litigation, SanDisk Corporation
Honorable James Ware ~ Mediator, Arbitrator, and Special Master, JAMS
Laura Wen-yu Young ~ Wang & Wang, LLP

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota 
approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Print Share Email