On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs
  Also Available in:  On-Demand MP3 Audio On-Demand MP4 - Mobile Video Seg

The Attorney-Client Privilege and Internal Investigations 2012

Released on: Aug. 28, 2012
Running Time: 01:58:09

Lecture Topics  [Total time 01:58:09]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • The Attorney-Client Privilege and Internal Investigations [01:58:09]
    Katherine M. Choo, Andrew J. Ceresney, George S. Canellos, Christina B. Dugger

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • New York Rules of Professional Conduct
  • The Legal Profession and Conflicts: Ain't No Mountain High Enough?
    C. Evan Stewart
  • In-House Counsel As Whistleblower: A Rat with a Remedy?
    C. Evan Stewart
  • Documents and Lawyers: Oil and Water?
    C. Evan Stewart
  • With Apologies to the Jackson Five: One Bad Apple Can Spoil the Whole Bunch!
    C. Evan Stewart
  • Caveat Corporate Litigator: The First Circuit Sets Back the Attorney Work Product Doctrine
    C. Evan Stewart
  • Thus Spake Zarathustra (And Other Cautionary Tales for Lawyers)
    C. Evan Stewart
  • Just When Lawyers Thought It Was Safe to Go Back Into the Water
    C. Evan Stewart
  • Ethics and Issues Relating to Attorney Work Product and Federal Rule of Evidence 502
    David S. Versfelt
  • Appendix
    David S. Versfelt
  • Ethics and In-House Corporate Counsel
    Carole L. Basri
  • The Ethical Difficulties of Court-Ordered Inspections of Social Networking Accounts
    Stephen D. Brody
  • Model Rule for the Lawyer As Third-Party Neutral
    Helena Tavares Erickson
  • Conflicts of Interest, What Are They, and Must They All Be Disclosed?
    Robert B. Davidson
  • The Attorney-Client Privilege and Internal Investigations: Privilege Issues in Structuring an Investigation and Interviewing Witnesses
    Mary Beth Hogan, Andrew J. Ceresney
  • "The Perils and Possibilities of the Joint Defense Agreement"
    Andrew J. Ceresney
  • "Disclosure of Internal Corporate Deliberations"
    Andrew J. Ceresney
  • "Attorney-Client Privilege and Issues for Corporate Counsel"
    Andrew J. Ceresney
  • "Investigations Foreign and Domestic: Choice-Of-Law and Discovery"
    Andrew J. Ceresney
  • "Dealing with Former Employees in Internal Investigations"
    Andrew J. Ceresney
  • "Privacy in the Workplace: An Oxymoron?"
    Andrew J. Ceresney
  • "Attorney Consultation in Presence of Spouse: Preserving Privilege"
    Andrew J. Ceresney
  • "Should Corporations Self-Report Wrongdoing?"
    Andrew J. Ceresney
  • "Whistleblower Reforms in Dodd-Frank Act"
    Andrew J. Ceresney
  • "The Origins of 'Upjohn' Warnings"
    Andrew J. Ceresney
  • "Preserving Privilege Over Internal Investigations in Derivative Litigation"
    Andrew J. Ceresney
Chairperson(s)
Andrew J. Ceresney ~ Co-Director, Division of Enforcement, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Speaker(s)
George S. Canellos ~ Co-Director, Division of Enforcement, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Katherine M. Choo ~ Chief Investigative & Anti-Corruption Counsel, General Electric Company
Christina B. Dugger ~ First Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Eastern District of New York

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota 
approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Related Items

Live Seminars  Live Seminars

Ethics for Corporate Lawyers 2014 (New York, NY) Dec. 15, 2014
Staying Out of Trouble: What Every Attorney Must Know About Ethics 2014 (New York, NY) Dec. 15, 2014
Ethics and Conflicts of Interest in Law Practice 2014 (New York, NY) Aug. 12, 2014
Attorney-Client Privilege and Internal Investigations 2014 (New York, NY) Aug. 12, 2014
Ethics for Discovery 2014 (New York, NY) Jul. 21, 2014
Ethics for In-House Corporate Counsel 2014 (New York, NY) Jul. 21, 2014
Ethics for Transactional Lawyers 2014 (Chicago, IL) Apr. 30, 2014
Staying Out of Trouble: What Every Attorney Must Know About Ethics 2014 (Chicago, IL) Apr. 30, 2014
Ethics for Commercial Litigators 2014 (New York, NY) Apr. 16, 2014
Ethics for the Negotiating Lawyer 2014 (New York, NY) Apr. 11, 2014
Ethics for Transactional Lawyers 2014 (New York, NY) Feb. 21, 2014
Ethics for Corporate Lawyers 2013 (New York, NY) Dec. 17, 2013
Staying Out of Trouble: What Every Attorney Must Know About Ethics 2013 (New York, NY) Dec. 17, 2013

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

Ethics for Discovery 2013 Aug. 5, 2013
Ethics for In-House Corporate Counsel 2013 Aug. 5, 2013
Ethics for Commercial Litigators 2013 Jul. 11, 2013
Ethics for Transactional Lawyers 2013 Apr. 1, 2013
Ethics for the Negotiating Lawyer 2013 Jan. 25, 2013
Staying Out of Trouble: What Every Attorney Must Know About Ethics 2012 Dec. 31, 2012
Ethics for Corporate Lawyers 2012 Dec. 31, 2012

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Winter Ethics 2014-2015  
Ethics for Transactional Lawyers 2014  
Ethics for Commercial Litigators 2014  
Ethics for the Negotiating Lawyer 2014  
PLI Ethics Programs: Spring 2014  
Winter Ethics 2013-2014  
PLI Ethics Programs: Chicago 2013 Howard Schneider, Charles River Associates
Michael S. Sackheim, Sidley Austin LLP
Michael S. Sackheim, Sidley Austin LLP
Terri L. Mascherin, Jenner & Block LLP
Terri L. Mascherin, Jenner & Block LLP
John C. Koski, Dentons US LLP
Maurice Grant, Grant Schumann LLC
Frederick M. Snow, First American Bank
Matthew J. Gehringer, Perkins Coie LLP
Daniel M. Kotin, Tomasik Kotin Kasserman, LLC
Hon. Sophia H. Hall, Chancery Division, Circuit Court of Cook County
Leslie Ellis, Ph. D., TrialGraphix
Howard Schneider, Charles River Associates
Patricia C. Bobb, Patricia C. Bobb & Associates
James J. Grogan, Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois
Julie A. Bauer, Winston & Strawn LLP
Jennifer T. Nijman, Nijman Franzetti LLP
Brenda H. Feis, Stowell & Friedman, Ltd
Hon. Thomas R. Mulroy, State of Illinois Circuit Court of Cook County, Law Division - Commercial Calendars Section
April A. Otterberg, Jenner & Block LLP
Robert L. Denby, Attorneys' Liability Assurance Society, Inc.
 
Ethics in Context: Summer 2012 Carole L. Basri, Executive Director of the Corporate Compliance Program, Fordham University Law School
Stephen D. Brody, O'Melveny & Myers LLP
Andrew J. Ceresney, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Katherine M. Choo, General Electric Company
Philip N. Yannella, Ballard Spahr LLP
Allison J. Schoenthal, Hogan Lovells US LLP
George S. Canellos, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
David Boyd Booker, Crédit Agricole Corporate & Investment Bank
Louise Pentland, Nokia Corporation
Christina B. Dugger, United States Attorney's Office, Eastern District of New York
 
Print Share Email
"Great panel."
Robert Vermylen, Morgan Stanley

"I found this discussion very informative and useful. I think the speakers were thorough and experienced in the subject matter."
Steven Pesner, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

"Outstanding Panel! A very impressive and extremely well qualified group of panelists. Their rapid-fire exchanges demonstrated both the depth of their knowledge and their fluency in current events."
Jeff Dumas, Axiom Global, Inc.

"Terrific program!"
Blythe Lovinger, Kasowitz Benson Torres & Friedman LLP