On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Taking and Defending Depositions 2013

Released on: Mar. 26, 2013
Running Time: 06:09:28

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:46:35] Deposition Strategy & Taking the Deposition James H.R. Windels ~ Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
James S. Goddard ~ Director/ Associate General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, Citi
Gerald A. Stein ~ Attorney, Northeast Regional Office, Federal Trade Commission
Denise Plunkett ~ Dickstein Shapiro LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:15:39] Preparing the Witness and Defending the Deposition Lori L. Pines ~ Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Hillary Richard ~ Brune & Richard LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:11] Expert Depositions Carla S. Mulhern ~ Managing Principal, Analysis Group, Inc.
Kimo S. Peluso ~ Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Jack G. Stern ~ Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:59:49] Using the Deposition on Summary Judgment and at Trial Lauren E. Aguiar ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Michael A. Paskin ~ Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:49] Ethical Dilemmas Arising With Depositions David G. Keyko ~ Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Roger Juan Maldonado ~ Balber Pickard Maldonado & Van Der Tuin, PC
Partha P. Chattoraj ~ Allegaert Berger & Vogel LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4

With fewer cases reaching juries, deposition testimony has become a substitute for trial testimony.  Skilled litigators know how to take advantage of this unique opportunity to gather information, learn about an adversary’s case, and get a close-up look at the performance of potential witnesses.  Learn how to maximize this chance to gain an advantage for future settlement or litigation.  Our faculty of experienced litigators will take you through every facet of the deposition process, starting with general strategic principles and moving through the use of deposition testimony at trial. We’ll also use demonstrations to illustrate the dos and don’ts of depositions, give you practice tips for each stage of the process, and show the tactical and strategic considerations behind the techniques employed.

Lecture Topics  [Total time 06:09:28]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Opening Remarks and Introduction* [00:06:25]
    Gerald A. Stein
  • Deposition Strategy & Taking the Deposition [01:46:35]
    James S. Goddard, Denise Plunkett, James H.R. Windels, Gerald A. Stein
  • Preparing the Witness and Defending the Deposition [01:15:39]
    Lori L. Pines, Hillary Richard
  • Expert Depositions [01:00:11]
    Jack G. Stern, Kimo S. Peluso, Carla S. Mulhern
  • Using the Deposition on Summary Judgment and at Trial [00:59:49]
    Lauren E. Aguiar, Michael A. Paskin
  • Ethical Dilemmas Arising With Depositions [01:00:49]
    Partha P. Chattoraj, David G. Keyko, Roger Juan Maldonado

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • Taking the Deposition: Practice Pointers
    Denise Plunkett
  • How to Construct a Deposition Outline
    Gerald A. Stein
  • Sample Exhibit List
    Gerald A. Stein
  • Background Materials for Advanced Deposition Tools, Skills and Challenges for the Modern Age
    Susan F. DiCicco, Todd B. Marcus
  • Preparing the Witness and Defending the Deposition
    Hillary Richard
  • VIP Witnesses: Preparation and Techniques for Deposition
    Kimo S. Peluso, Steven F. Reich, Jeffrey N. Herman
  • Expert Depositions
    Laura B. Stamm, Jack G. Stern, Kimo S. Peluso
  • Work Product Protection for Experts: Notable Decisions Under the 2010 Amendments to Rule 26
    Kimo S. Peluso
  • Bound for Preclusion? When and How a Rule 30(b)(6) Representative Binds the Corporation
    Lauren E. Aguiar
  • Ethical Considerations for Effective Deposition Defense in New York
    Partha P. Chattoraj
  • Index to Taking and Defending Depositions 2013

Presentation Material

  • Taking The Deposition
    Denise Plunkett
  • Deposition Strategy & Taking the Deposition
    Gerald A. Stein
  • Deposition Strategy & Taking the Deposition
    Gerald A. Stein
  • Preparing the Witness and Defending the Deposition
    Lori L. Pines
  • Preparing the Witness and Defending the Deposition
    Hillary Richard
  • Expert Depositions
    Jack G. Stern, Kimo S. Peluso, Carla S. Mulhern
  • Using the Deposition on Summary Judgment and at Trial
    Lauren E. Aguiar, Michael A. Paskin
  • Ethical Dilemmas Arising With Depositions
    Partha P. Chattoraj, David G. Keyko, Roger Juan Maldonado
Chairperson(s)
Randi W. Singer ~ Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Co-Chair(s)
Gerald A. Stein ~ Attorney, Northeast Regional Office, Federal Trade Commission
Speaker(s)
Lauren E. Aguiar ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Partha P. Chattoraj ~ Allegaert Berger & Vogel LLP
James S. Goddard ~ Director/ Associate General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, Citi
David G. Keyko ~ Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Roger Juan Maldonado ~ Balber Pickard Maldonado & Van Der Tuin, PC
Carla S. Mulhern ~ Managing Principal, Analysis Group, Inc.
Michael A. Paskin ~ Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP
Kimo S. Peluso ~ Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Lori L. Pines ~ Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Denise Plunkett ~ Dickstein Shapiro LLP
Hillary Richard ~ Brune & Richard LLP
Jack G. Stern ~ Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP
James H.R. Windels ~ Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota 
approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Related Items

Live Seminars  Live Seminars

Fundamentals of Taking and Defending Depositions 2014 (New York, NY) Mar. 11, 2014
Advanced Deposition Techniques 2014 (New York, NY) Jan. 21, 2014

On-Demand  On-Demand Programs

Advanced Deposition Techniques 2013 Feb. 7, 2013

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Fundamentals of Taking and Defending Depositions 2014  
Advanced Deposition Techniques 2014  
Taking and Defending Depositions 2013 Randi W. Singer, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
 
Advanced Deposition Techniques 2013 Kimo S. Peluso, Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Susan F. DiCicco, Bingham McCutchen LLP
 
Taking and Defending Depositions 2012 Randi W. Singer, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Seth A. Gastwirth, Kirkland & Ellis LLP
 
Print Share Email