On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Social Security Disability 2013: From Administrative Proceedings to Federal Practice

Released on: Apr. 2, 2013
Running Time: 02:59:12

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[00:56:17] Overview of Social Security Benefits and the Administrative Law Judge Hearing Kyla L. Ratliff ~ Staff Attorney, Brooklyn Neighborhood Office, The Legal Aid Society
Anne Callagy ~ Supervising Attorney, Government Benefits; Bronx Neighborhood Office, The Legal Aid Society
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:43] Agency's Review of the Decision; Federal Court Review in Social Security Cases Kyla L. Ratliff ~ Staff Attorney, Brooklyn Neighborhood Office, The Legal Aid Society
Anne Callagy ~ Supervising Attorney, Government Benefits; Bronx Neighborhood Office, The Legal Aid Society
Marie I. Mombrun ~ Staff Attorney, The Legal Aid Society
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:56:20] Federal Court Review (Cont.); Working with Pro Bono Counsel J. Lorch Brooks ~ The Legal Aid Society
Kyla L. Ratliff ~ Staff Attorney, Brooklyn Neighborhood Office, The Legal Aid Society
Yafit Cohn ~ Cahill, Gordon & Reindel LLP
Anne Callagy ~ Supervising Attorney, Government Benefits; Bronx Neighborhood Office, The Legal Aid Society
Marie I. Mombrun ~ Staff Attorney, The Legal Aid Society
On-Demand MP3 MP4

Disabled children and adults need your help!  Learn federal practice as you learn how to represent disabled children and adults who need your assistance following denials of their claims by the Social Security Administration.

After denial of an initial disability claim, claimants frequently find a possible appeal to be confusing, difficult, and even overwhelming.  Many claimants cannot afford legal representation and must navigate the appeals process on their own.

In this free PLI program, you will learn about social security disability claims, and how to represent disabled children and adults in their appeals from denials of their claims by the Social Security Administration.  You will also learn about federal practice, within the context of social security disability, which will have broader application to anyone practicing in the federal courts.

Regardless of your area of practice, this program is a perfect vehicle for attorneys interested in learning more about federal practice and social security disability and getting involved in pro bono opportunities with legal service organizations.

Lecture Topics  [Total time 02:59:12]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Introducion* [00:05:52]
    Marie Richardson
  • Overview of Social Security Benefits and the Administrative Law Judge Hearing [00:56:17]
    Anne Callagy, Kyla L. Ratliff
  • Agency's Review of the Decision; Federal Court Review in Social Security Cases [01:00:43]
    Anne Callagy, Kyla L. Ratliff, Marie I. Mombrun
  • Federal Court Review (Cont.); Working with Pro Bono Counsel [00:56:20]
    Anne Callagy, Yafit Cohn, J. Lorch Brooks, Marie I. Mombrun, Kyla L. Ratliff

Presentation Material

  • Introducion
  • Overview of Social Security Benefits and ALJ Hearings
    Kyla L. Ratliff
  • Federal Practice and Social Security Appeals
    Marie I. Mombrun
  • Appeals Council Review of ALJ Decisions
    Anne Callagy
Chairperson(s)
Marie Richardson ~ The Legal Aid Society, Civil Division
Speaker(s)
J. Lorch Brooks ~ The Legal Aid Society
Anne Callagy ~ Supervising Attorney, Government Benefits; Bronx Neighborhood Office, The Legal Aid Society
Yafit Cohn ~ Cahill, Gordon & Reindel LLP
Marie I. Mombrun ~ Staff Attorney, The Legal Aid Society
Kyla L. Ratliff ~ Staff Attorney, Brooklyn Neighborhood Office, The Legal Aid Society

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota 
approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Print Share Email