Seminar  Interactive Learning Center

Patent Law Practice: Learn to Be a Successful Patent Practitioner 2017

Why you should participate

From PLI’s Interactive Learning Center comes Patent Law Practice: Learn to be a Successful Patent Practitioner 2017, a one-of-a-kind experience for patent practitioners. Chaired by patent authority and PLI faculty member Jeffrey G. Sheldon, this course runs for 10 weeks, from August 24 to November 15 with live webinar sessions every Wednesday at 2:00 pm EDT (2:00pm EST after November 5th). There will be a two week break the weeks of October 9th and October 16th during which there will not be a live webinar session on October 11th and October 18th. Users will still be able to use the program to watch the videos and do the readings. Through a combination of live webinars, pre-recorded lectures, reading and written assignments, this course will benefit those looking to become proficient as patent practitioners. Access to the course materials includes sections of the treatise How to Write a Patent Application by Jeffrey G. Sheldon.

What you will learn

Interviewing an Inventor and Obtaining a Patentability Study

  • Learn how to interview an inventor
  • Conduct a live interview with an inventor
  • Determine when to order a patentability search

 Conducting a Patentability Search/Evaluating Search Results

  • Conduct your own patentability search
  • Evaluate search results
  • Assess whether a patent application should be filed
  • Learn about prior art, novelty, and obviousness

 Drafting Claims

  • Draft claims
  • Learn claim drafting strategies
  • Identify claim deficiencies

 Ordering Drawings and Writing a Patent Application

  • Identify when drawings are required
  • Order drawings
  • Learn requirements for description and enablement
  • Prepare a patent application

Provisionals, Design, and Information Disclosure Statements

  • File the patent application
  • Learn how to obtain prioritized examination
  • Identify advantages and disadvantages of provisional applications
  • File an Information Disclosure Statement
  • Prepare a design patent application

 Restriction Requirements and Responding to First Office Actions

  • Handle restriction requirements
  • Learn about double patenting
  • Respond to a first office action

Responding to Final Rejection

  • Report a final rejection
  • Learn strategies regarding final rejection and follow-on applications

Infringement and Validity Opinions

  • Learn how to write opinions regarding infringement and validity
  • Understand the importance of a formal written opinion
  • Identify the structure of an opinion
  • Prepare for a bad conclusion

Foreign Filing

  • Devise strategies for foreign filing
  • Learn where to file
  • Determine when revision of a U.S. application is preferable

 Post Issuance

  • Learn what can happen to patents in the PTO after issuance
  • Discover the different post-issue challenges available

Who should participate

This course will benefit people desiring to become patent practitioners as well as patent attorneys and agents wanting to improve their skills.

Faculty

Jeffrey G. Sheldon

General credit information about this format appears below. For credit information specific to this program, please choose your jurisdiction(s) in the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page.

PLI’s live and on-demand webcasts are single-user license products intended for an individual registrant only. Credit will be issued only to the individual registered.


U.S. MCLE States

Alabama:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

Alaska:  All PLI products can fulfill Alaska’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Arizona:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “interactive CLE” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via interactive CLE programs.

Arkansas:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs are not approved for Arkansas CLE credit.

California:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “participatory” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via participatory programs.

Colorado:  All PLI products can fulfill Colorado’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Connecticut: Effective January 1, 2017, all PLI products can fulfill Connecticut’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Delaware:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “eCLE” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of eCLE per reporting period, no more than 6 of which may be audio-only.

Florida:  All PLI products can fulfill Florida’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Georgia:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “in-house” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 in-house credits per reporting period.

Hawaii:  All PLI products can fulfill Hawaii’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Idaho:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Illinois:  All PLI products can fulfill Illinois' CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Indiana:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “distance education” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance education per reporting period.

Iowa:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “unmoderated” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of unmoderated programs per reporting period.

Kansas:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “non-traditional” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of non-traditional programs per reporting period.

Kentucky:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “non-live” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 non-live credits per reporting period.

Louisiana:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Maine:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5.5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Minnesota:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 on-demand credits per reporting period.

Mississippi:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Missouri:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Montana:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Nebraska:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “computer-based learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 5 credits of computer-based learning per reporting period.

Nevada:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via self-study programs.

New Hampshire:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New Jersey:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “alternative verifiable learning formats” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of alternative verifiable learning formats per reporting period.

New Mexico:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 4 credits of self-study per reporting period.

New York

Experienced Attorneys:  All PLI products can fulfill New York’s CLE requirements for experienced attorneys. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Newly Admitted Attorneys:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs cannot be used to fulfill the requirements for New York newly admitted attorneys.

North Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online programs per reporting period.

North Dakota:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 15 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Ohio:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Oklahoma:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “online, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of online, on-demand programs per reporting period.

Oregon:  All PLI products can fulfill Oregon’s CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Pennsylvania:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Puerto Rico:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “non-traditional” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of non-traditional programs per reporting period.

Rhode Island:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 3 on-demand credits per reporting period.

South Carolina:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “alternatively delivered” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of alternatively delivered programs per reporting period.

Tennessee:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “distance learning” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of distance learning per reporting period.

Texas:  All PLI products can fulfill Texas’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Utah:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Vermont:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of self-study per reporting period.

Virgin Islands:  All PLI products can fulfill the Virgin Islands’ CLE requirements. There is no limit to the number of credits an attorney can earn via PLI products.

Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “pre-recorded” credit. Attorneys are limited to 8 credits of pre-recorded programs per reporting period.

Washington:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “A/V” credit. Attorneys are limited to 22.5 credits of A/V programs per reporting period.

West Virginia:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “online” credit. Attorneys are limited to 12 credits of online instruction per reporting period.

Wisconsin:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “repeated, on-demand” credit. Attorneys are limited to 10 credits of repeated, on-demand programs per reporting period. No ethics credits can be earned via on-demand programs.

Wyoming:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “self-study” credit. Attorneys are limited to 6 credits of self-study per reporting period.

CPD Jurisdictions

British Columbia (CPD-BC):  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs are not eligible for CPD-BC credit unless viewed with at least one other attorney or an articled student. In this case, the credit must be recorded as a “study group.”

Ontario (CPD-ON):  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “recorded” credit. If viewed without a colleague, attorneys are limited to 6 credits of recorded programs per year. If viewed with at least one colleague, there is no limit to the number of credits that can be earned via recorded programs.

Quebec (CPD-QC):  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs can fulfill Quebec’s CPD requirements.

Hong Kong (CPD-HK):  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs are not approved for CPD-HK credit.

United Kingdom (CPD-UK):  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs can fulfill the United Kingdom’s CPD requirements.

Other Credit Types

CPE Credit (NASBA):  Select on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs qualify as “QAS Self-Study” credit. Please check the Credit Information box on the right-hand side of this page to verify CPE credit availability.

IRS Continuing Education (IRS-CE):  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs may fulfill IRS-CE requirements. To request IRS-CE credit, please notify PLI at cleadministrator@pli.edu of your request and include your Preparer Tax Identification Number (PTIN).

Certified Fraud Examiner CPE:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs may fulfill Certified Fraud Examiner CPE requirements. To request CPE credit or find out which programs offer CPE, please contact PLI at cleadministrator@pli.edu.

IAPP Continuing Privacy Credit (CPE):  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs may fulfill Privacy CPE credit requirements.

HR Recertification (HRCI):  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs may fulfill HR credit requirements.

IIEI Recertification:  PLI’s on-demand Interactive Learning Center programs may qualify for the Continuing Education Units (CEUs) necessary to fulfill the Certified U.S. Export Compliance Officer® (CUSECO) continuing education requirements.

 

 

Share
Email

  • FOLLOW PLI:
  • twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • GooglePlus
  • RSS

All Contents Copyright © 1996-2017 Practising Law Institute. Continuing Legal Education since 1933.

© 2017 PLI PRACTISING LAW INSTITUTE. All rights reserved. The PLI logo is a service mark of PLI.