On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

PLI's California MCLE Marathon 2012: Current Developments in Legal Ethics - Substance Abuse - Elimination of Bias in the Profession

Released on: Dec. 17, 2012
Running Time: 06:00:33

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:20:30] Protecting Privilege and Confidentiality: New Challenges Mark L. Tuft ~ Cooper, White & Cooper LLP
Merri A. Baldwin ~ Shareholder, Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, PC
James E. Towery ~ Rossi, Hamerslough, Reischl and Chuck
Randall Difuntorum ~ Director, Professional Competence, The State Bar of California
Wendy Wen Yun Chang ~ Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:29:45] New Frontiers: Lawyers' Conflicting Ethical Responsibilities Across Different Borders Mark L. Tuft ~ Cooper, White & Cooper LLP
Merri A. Baldwin ~ Shareholder, Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, PC
James E. Towery ~ Rossi, Hamerslough, Reischl and Chuck
Randall Difuntorum ~ Director, Professional Competence, The State Bar of California
Wendy Wen Yun Chang ~ Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:15] Recent Developments in the Law Governing Attorneys Mark L. Tuft ~ Cooper, White & Cooper LLP
Merri A. Baldwin ~ Shareholder, Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, PC
James E. Towery ~ Rossi, Hamerslough, Reischl and Chuck
Randall Difuntorum ~ Director, Professional Competence, The State Bar of California
Wendy Wen Yun Chang ~ Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:40] Dealing With Stress and Substance Abuse in the Legal Profession Richard P. Carlton, MPH ~ Acting Director, State Bar of California
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:00:05] The Opportunity and Obligation to Eliminate Bias in the Legal Profession Yolanda M. Jackson ~ Deputy Director, The Bar Association of San Francisco
Jean K. Hyams ~ Levy Vinick Hyams & Burrell LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4

Satisfy all of California’s MCLE special requirements at this fast-paced and up-to-the-minute program.  If your last name begins with a letter from A through G, your MCLE compliance deadline of February 1, 2013 is fast approaching.

The MCLE Marathon, taught by a faculty of outstanding California lawyers and other professionals who are recognized leaders in their field, will conveniently provide all of the California required-subjects that you need:

  • 4 hours of legal ethics
  • 1 hour of prevention, detection and treatment of substance abuse or mental illness that impairs professional competence
  • 1 hour of elimination of bias in the legal profession
Lecture Topics  [Total time 06:00:33]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Program Overview* [00:09:18]
    Merri A. Baldwin, Randall Difuntorum, Mark L. Tuft, James E. Towery, Wendy Wen Yun Chang
  • Protecting Privilege and Confidentiality: New Challenges [01:20:30]
    Merri A. Baldwin, Randall Difuntorum, Mark L. Tuft, James E. Towery, Wendy Wen Yun Chang
  • New Frontiers: Lawyers' Conflicting Ethical Responsibilities Across Different Borders [01:29:45]
    Merri A. Baldwin, Randall Difuntorum, Mark L. Tuft, James E. Towery, Wendy Wen Yun Chang
  • Recent Developments in the Law Governing Attorneys [01:00:15]
    Randall Difuntorum, Merri A. Baldwin, Mark L. Tuft, James E. Towery, Wendy Wen Yun Chang
  • Dealing With Stress and Substance Abuse in the Legal Profession [01:00:40]
    Richard P. Carlton, MPH
  • The Opportunity and Obligation to Eliminate Bias in the Legal Profession [01:00:05]
    Jean K. Hyams, Yolanda M. Jackson

The purchase price of this includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • Too Hot to Handle: The Legal Ethics of Inadvertently or Improperly Produced Privileged Information
    Merri A. Baldwin
  • The California Supreme Court Clarifies Attorney Work Product Protection and the Ninth Circuit Rejects the Selective Waiver Doctrine
    Randall Difuntorum
  • The State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct, Formal Opinion No. 2012-183
    Randall Difuntorum
  • Proposed Rule 1.6 Confidential Information of a Client
    Randall Difuntorum
  • Explanation of Recommendation to Not Adopt Model Rule 4.4 Respect for Rights of Third Persons
    Randall Difuntorum
  • A California Perspective on Foreign Lawyer Consultants
  • Fordham Law Review (Janine Griffiths-Baker & Nancy J. Moore, Regulating Conflicts of Interest in Global Law Firms: Peace in Our Time?, 80 Fordham L. Rev. 2541 (2012))
  • Proposed Changes in the Regulation of Cross-Border Practice and Resolving Choice of Law Issues: New Challenges for Lawyers Practicing in California
    Mark L. Tuft
  • Proposed Rule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice of Law; Multijurisdictional Practice of Law
    Randall Difuntorum
  • Proposed California Rule of Professional Conduct 8.5
    Randall Difuntorum
  • The State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct, Formal Opinion No. 2012-184
    Randall Difuntorum
  • The State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct, Formal Opinion No. 2011-181
    Randall Difuntorum
  • Selected New Developments in the Law of Lawyers
    James E. Towery
  • The State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct, Formal Opinion No. 2011-182
    Randall Difuntorum
  • Proposed California Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1
    Randall Difuntorum
  • Proposed California Rule of Professional Conduct 1.8.10
    Randall Difuntorum
  • The California Rules of Professional Conduct
    Randall Difuntorum
  • Stress, Depression, and Substance Abuse in the Legal Profession
    Richard P. Carlton, MPH
  • Dealing with Stress and Substance Abuse in the Legal Profession (PowerPoint Slides)
    Richard P. Carlton, MPH
  • Additional Resources Related to Elimination of Bias in the Legal Profession
    Jean K. Hyams
  • Accommodating Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Clients
    Jean K. Hyams
  • Request for Accommodations by Persons with Disabilities and Response, California Judicial Council Form, MC-410
    Jean K. Hyams
  • The State Bar of California Standing Committee on Professional Responsibility and Conduct, Formal Opinion No. 1987-92
    Jean K. Hyams
  • Rule 2-400. Prohibited Discriminatory Conduct in a Law Practice
    Yolanda M. Jackson
  • Conscious and Unconscious Bias in the Legal Profession: Anecdotes from the Real World
    Yolanda M. Jackson
  • February 2011 Self Study Examination, Addressing Bias in the Legal Profession, The Bar Association of San Francisco
    Yolanda M. Jackson
  • Ways to Respond to Bias, and Steps to Recognize and Let Go of Biases
    Yolanda M. Jackson
  • Index to PLI's California MCLE Marathon 2012

Presentation Material

  • Dealing With Stress and Substance Abuse in the Legal Profession
    Richard P. Carlton, MPH
  • The Opportunity and Obligation to Eliminate Bias in the Legal Profession
    Jean K. Hyams
Co-Chair(s)
Merri A. Baldwin ~ Shareholder, Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, PC
Randall Difuntorum ~ Director, Professional Competence, The State Bar of California
Speaker(s)
Wendy Wen Yun Chang ~ Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Jean K. Hyams ~ Levy Vinick Hyams & Burrell LLP
Yolanda M. Jackson ~ Deputy Director, The Bar Association of San Francisco
Richard P. Carlton, MPH ~ Acting Director, State Bar of California
James E. Towery ~ Rossi, Hamerslough, Reischl and Chuck
Mark L. Tuft ~ Cooper, White & Cooper LLP

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota 
approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Print Share Email