On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Judges' Pet Peeves 2013: Tips from the Bench on Trial Practice

Released on: Oct. 21, 2013
Running Time: 01:59:28

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:57:13] Judicial Pet Peeves in Civil Litigation Hon. Roslynn Renee Mauskopf ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Hon. Judith J. Gische ~ Associate Justice, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department
Mark C. Zauderer ~ Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP
Hon. O. Peter Sherwood ~ Supreme Court Justice, Commercial Division, Supreme Court of the State of New York
Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Hon. Laura Taylor Swain ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Hon. Barbara R. Kapnick ~ Supreme Court Justice, Commercial Division, Supreme Court of the State of New York
Scott E. Mollen ~ Herrick, Feinstein LLP
Richard A. Edlin ~ Greenberg Traurig LLP
Hon. Jeffrey K. Oing ~ Supreme Court Justice, Supreme Court of the State of New York
Hon. Dora L. Irizarry ~ United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
On-Demand MP3 MP4

This program will provide litigators with the unique opportunity to hear directly from the judges how they view communications with the court and trial practice, as well as how lawyers can help (or sabotage) their cases.

Lecture Topics 
[Total time 01:59:28]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Introduction* [00:02:15]
    Mark C. Zauderer
  • Judicial Pet Peeves in Civil Litigation [01:57:13]
    Mark C. Zauderer, Scott E. Mollen, Hon. Laura Taylor Swain, Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan, Hon. Dora L. Irizarry, Hon. Barbara R. Kapnick, Hon. Jeffrey K. Oing, Richard A. Edlin, Hon. Roslynn Renee Mauskopf, Hon. Judith J. Gische, Hon. O. Peter Sherwood

Presentation Material

  • Introduction
    Mark C. Zauderer
  • Effective Discovery in Business and Commercial Cases in State Court
    Mark C. Zauderer
  • Pet Peeves from the Bench and Your Peers
  • Pet Peeves from the Bench
  • Judges' Pet Peeves
  • Some Random Thoughts on Brief Writing
  • Through the Spectacles of Arkansas Judges 10 Tips for Improving Legal Writing froman Arkansas Judicial Survey
  • Uncivil Conduct in Depositions
  • How Judges Can Enforce Civility By Punishing Frivolous Conduct
Chairperson(s)
Mark C. Zauderer ~ Flemming Zulack Williamson Zauderer LLP
Speaker(s)
Richard A. Edlin ~ Greenberg Traurig LLP
Hon. Judith J. Gische ~ Associate Justice, New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department
Hon. Dora L. Irizarry ~ United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Hon. Lewis A. Kaplan ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York
Hon. Barbara R. Kapnick ~ Supreme Court Justice, Commercial Division, Supreme Court of the State of New York
Hon. Roslynn Renee Mauskopf ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Eastern District of New York
Scott E. Mollen ~ Herrick, Feinstein LLP
Hon. Jeffrey K. Oing ~ Supreme Court Justice, Supreme Court of the State of New York
Hon. O. Peter Sherwood ~ Supreme Court Justice, Commercial Division, Supreme Court of the State of New York
Hon. Laura Taylor Swain ~ United States District Judge, United States District Court, Southern District of New York

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota 
approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Print Share Email