Advanced Search

Seminars & Webcasts

On-Demand Learning

Publications

Patent Bar Review

Blogs

On-Demand Web Programs

International Arbitration 2013

Released on: Jun. 24, 2013

Running Time: 07:32:04

Segments
Overview
Faculty
CLE Credit

Running Time	Segment Title	Faculty
[01:29:41]	Introduction and Using U.S. Courts in Aid of International Arbitration	Franco Ferrari ~ Professor of Law, Director, Center for Transnational Litigation and Commercial Law, New York University School of Law Joseph E. Neuhaus ~ Sullivan & Cromwell LLP John Fellas ~ Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP Catherine Amirfar ~ Debevoise & Plimpton LLP David M. Lindsey ~ Chaffetz Lindsey LLP
[01:44:57]	Arbitration Around the World	Karim Hafez ~ Hafez Naoki Iguchi ~ Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu Luciano Benetti Timm ~ Carvalho, Machado, Timm & Deffenti David Arias ~ Arias SLP
[01:00:18]	Drafting Arbitration Clauses	John Fellas ~ Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP Louis Flannery ~ Stephenson Harwood LLP Martin F. Gusy ~ Gusy Van der Zandt LLP
[01:22:47]	Advocacy in International Arbitration	Mark Hoyle ~ S J Berwin Oliver J. Armas ~ Hogan Lovells US LLP David Arias ~ Arias SLP Laurence Shore ~ Herbert Smith Freehills New York LLP
[01:22:51]	Practical Tips from Leading Arbitrators	Elliot E. Polebaum ~ Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson Barry H. Garfinkel ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP John A.M. Judge ~ Resident Arbitrator, Arbitration Place Hilary Heilbron QC ~ Brick Court Chambers Caline Mouawad ~ King & Spalding LLP

If your company or client has a dispute arising out of a contract with a foreign party, international arbitration represents the best method of resolving that dispute in a neutral forum and enforcing any subsequent award. However, the resolution of international business disputes through arbitration raises issues that are simply not present in the litigation context. In many ways, arbitration offers more choices than litigation. What is the appropriate place of arbitration? Under which rules should you arbitrate? How many arbitrators should you have? Which arbitrator should you choose? How can you make the proceeding more efficient? This program will address these and other critical issues and give you the information you need to successfully navigate the international arbitration process. Our exceptional faculty of experienced practitioners will instruct you on the most current and important topics in this fast-growing field. If you handle any aspects of international arbitration or mediation for your clients or company, you will not want to miss this conference.

Lecture Topics [Total time 07:32:04]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

Introduction and Using U.S. Courts in Aid of International Arbitration [01:29:41]
Catherine Amirfar, John Fellas, Franco Ferrari, David M. Lindsey, Joseph E. Neuhaus
Arbitration Around the World [01:44:57]
David Arias, Karim Hafez, Naoki Iguchi, Luciano Benetti Timm
Keynote Lunch* [00:31:30]
Gerald Aksen
Drafting Arbitration Clauses [01:00:18]
John Fellas, Louis Flannery, Martin F. Gusy
Advocacy in International Arbitration [01:22:47]
Oliver J. Armas, Mark Hoyle, Laurence Shore, David Arias
Practical Tips from Leading Arbitrators [01:22:51]
Barry H. Garfinkel, Hilary Heilbron QC, John A.M. Judge, Caline Mouawad, Elliot E. Polebaum

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

Obtaining Evidence for Use in International Arbitrations Through United States Courts
Catherine Amirfar, David W. Rivkin, Donald F. Donovan
After the ECJ’s West Tankers: The Clash of Civilizations on the Issue of an Anti-Suit Injunction
Franco Ferrari
Recent Developments: Nonparty Discovery in the United States
James H. Carter, John L. Hardiman, Joseph E. Neuhaus
The Role of Spanish Courts in Arbitrations
David Arias
What a Difference a Half Century Makes
Gerald Aksen
Drafting Arbitration Clauses
John Fellas
Using Section 1782 in International Arbitration
John Fellas
Case Note: Assistance Offered by New York Courts in Aid of International Arbitration Proceedings Elsewhere
John Fellas
Drafting Arbitration Clauses
Martin F. Gusy
Tim Taylor QC’s Arbitration Advocacy Alphabet
Timothy Taylor QC
Pet Peeves of Arbitrators: Best (Or at Least Good) Practices for Counsel
Elliot E. Polebaum

Presentation Material

Introduction and Using U.S. Courts in Aid of International Arbitration
Catherine Amirfar
Arbitration Around the World
David Arias
Arbitration Around the World
Luciano Benetti Timm
Arbitration Around the World
Luciano Benetti Timm
Arbitration Around the World
Naoki Iguchi
Drafting Arbitration Clauses
John Fellas

Chairperson(s)

John Fellas ~ Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP

Speaker(s)

Gerald Aksen ~ Arbitrator & Mediator,

Catherine Amirfar ~ Debevoise & Plimpton LLP

David Arias ~ Arias SLP

Oliver J. Armas ~ Hogan Lovells US LLP

Franco Ferrari ~ Professor of Law, Director, Center for Transnational Litigation and Commercial Law, New York University School of Law

Louis Flannery ~ Stephenson Harwood LLP

Barry H. Garfinkel ~ Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Martin F. Gusy ~ Gusy Van der Zandt LLP

Karim Hafez ~ Hafez

Mark Hoyle ~ S J Berwin

Naoki Iguchi ~ Nagashima Ohno & Tsunematsu

John A.M. Judge ~ Resident Arbitrator, Arbitration Place

David M. Lindsey ~ Chaffetz Lindsey LLP

Caline Mouawad ~ King & Spalding LLP

Joseph E. Neuhaus ~ Sullivan & Cromwell LLP

Elliot E. Polebaum ~ Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson

Hilary Heilbron QC ~ Brick Court Chambers

Laurence Shore ~ Herbert Smith Freehills New York LLP

Luciano Benetti Timm ~ Carvalho, Machado, Timm & Deffenti

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments. Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama¹, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa²*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri³, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire⁴, New Jersey, New Mexico⁵, New York⁶, North Carolina⁷, North Dakota, Ohio⁸, Oklahoma⁹, Oregon*, Pennsylvania¹⁰, Rhode Island¹¹, South Carolina, Tennessee¹², Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia¹³, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin¹⁴ and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.

¹Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

²Iowa: The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

³Missouri: On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year. Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements. Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

⁴New Hamphsire: The approval is for three years from recorded date.

⁵New Mexico: On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year.

⁶New York: Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats.

⁷North Carolina: A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs.

⁸Ohio: To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us. Online programs are considered self-study. Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period. The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

⁹Oklahoma: Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.

¹⁰Pennsylvania: PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.

¹¹Rhode Island: Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit. On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

¹²Tennessee: The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

¹³Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

¹⁴Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed. The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit. There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.

If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.

Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

Live Seminars

International Arbitration 2014 (New York, NY)

Jun. 9, 2014

On-Demand Programs

International Litigation 2012

Jun. 25, 2012

Course Handbook Archive

International Arbitration 2014
International Arbitration 2013	John Fellas, Hughes, Hubbard & Reed LLP
International Litigation 2012	John Fellas, Hughes Hubbard & Reed LLP Jeffrey W. Sarles, Mayer Brown LLP

Related Treatises

Fashion Law and Business: Brands & Retailers

Social Media and the Law

Post-Grant Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

FOLLOW PLI:

Practice Areas

Location

Credit Type

Format

Practice Areas

Credit Type

Format

Specialty

Practice Areas

Format

Subscriptions

On-Demand Web Programs

International Arbitration 2013

On-Demand Segment

CREDIT INFORMATION

Related Items

Live Seminars

On-Demand Programs

Course Handbook Archive

CREDIT INFORMATION

Check Specific State Credit Requirements

Related Treatises


	Practice Areas Accounting Banking Bankruptcy & Restructuring Corporate & Securities Employment Ethics/Professional Responsibility Health Care Intellectual Property International Litigation Patent Pro Bono Professional Skills Real Estate Tax Location New York, NY San Francisco, CA Chicago, IL Washington, DC Los Angeles, CA Credit Type Elimination of Bias Ethics General Professional Practice Skills Substance Abuse Format Seminars Webcasts Groupcasts One-Hour Briefings


	The Exam Live Courses Homestudy Course Testimonials FAQ's For Engineers & Scientists


	Securities Law Practice Center Patent Law Practice Center PLI Librarian


	On-Demand Segment Description Faculty CLE Credit PLI makes every effort to accredit its recorded programs. PLI MP3s are approved in the following states/territories: AK, CA¹, CO, FL, GA, ID, IL, KS², ME, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OR, PA, TX³, UT, VI, VT, WA, WV, WY. Some exceptions apply. For more information contact PLI. ¹California: This activity qualifies for participatory credit. ²Kansas: There is a 5.0 credit limit per year for this type of viewing. ³Texas: Considered self-study credit. There is a 5 credit limit, including specialty credit. Please note:* The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. *PLI will apply for credit upon request. Running time and CLE credit hours earned are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon speakers. Special Note: In New York, non-traditional course formats including audio and video cassettes are NOT acceptable for transitional CLE credit for the newly admitted attorney within the first two years after their admission to the Bar. Attorneys other than newly admitted may use non-traditional course format, including audio and video cassettes to fulfill their CLE requirements. IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR ATTORNEYS SEEKING CLE CREDIT While listening to the program, be alert to listen for the AUTHORIZATION CODE which has been placed somewhere within the program. Write the code down; you will be asked for this information when you request CLE credit. Once you’ve completed the program, please go to www.pli.edu and log in. Once you are logged in, your account will be displayed and the available programs will be listed on the left side under the heading "My Online Library". If you are already logged in, click the link for My Account on the home page to access your Online Library. Return to the program and click the MCLE Registration button in the top right region of the program window. A new window will open with a CLE Request form, you will be asked to complete a short evaluation, and fill in the AUTHORIZATION CODE, please complete and submit the form. Once you click the Submit button, your request for CLE credit will be sent to the CLE department. PLI will email you a CLE certificate within 48 hours. If you are unable to successfully log in, please contact our customer service department at 800-260-4754 for assistance. GENERAL INFORMATION This product is designed to provide practical and useful information on the subject matter covered. However, it is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued. PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments. Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state. On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in: Alabama¹, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois , Iowa², Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri³, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire⁴, New Jersey, New Mexico⁵, New York⁶, North Carolina⁷, North Dakota, Ohio⁸, Oklahoma⁹, Oregon, Pennsylvania¹⁰, Rhode Island¹¹, South Carolina, Tennessee¹², Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia¹³, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin¹⁴ and Wyoming. Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs. Minnesota approves live webcasts ONLY Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45. *PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs. ¹Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits. ²Iowa: The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts. ³Missouri: On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year. Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements. Self-study can not be used for carryover credit. ⁴New Hamphsire: The approval is for three years from recorded date. ⁵New Mexico: On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. ⁶New York: Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. ⁷North Carolina: A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. ⁸Ohio: To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us. Online programs are considered self-study. Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period. The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program. ⁹Oklahoma: Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs. ¹⁰Pennsylvania: PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour. ¹¹Rhode Island: Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit. On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component. ¹²Tennessee: The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented. ¹³Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions. ¹⁴Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed. The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit. There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts. Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers. If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued. Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu. Add to Cart Membership Suite Options: Add to My List Register From Roster Request Groupcast Receive all of the items below at the reduced price of $0.00 A combined savings of $0.00 Buy Combo CREDIT INFORMATION Credits for: