On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs
  Also Available in:  On-Demand Audio CD On-Demand DVD Video

Children's Law Institute (15th Annual)

Released on: Aug. 13, 2012
Running Time: 06:23:10

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[02:27:20] Introduction and Custody Cases for the Child Welfare Attorney Anna Maria Diamanti ~ Director, Family Law and Domestic Violence Unit, South Brooklyn Legal Services
Hon. Anne-Marie Jolly ~ Queens Family Court
Susan Sommer ~ Director of Constitutional Litigation and Senior Counsel, Lambda Legal
Rebecca S. Rubloff ~ Director of Training, NYC Administration for Children's Services
Margaret P. O'Marra ~ Supervising Social Worker, The Legal Aid Society
Diane Costanzo ~ Referee, NYS Unified Court System
Elizabeth Fassler ~ Co-Director, Queens Practice, The Center for Family Representation, Inc.
Dawn J. Post ~ Co-Borough Director, Children's Law Center
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:59:56] Utilizing Forensics in Custody Cases Dr. Marcia Werchol ~ Senior Director, Family Court Mental Health Services, NYC Health and Hospitals Corporation
Katherine F. Wurmfeld ~ Senior Attorney, New York Legal Assistance Group
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:13:34] Visitation Hon. Paula J. Hepner ~ Supervising Judge of Kings & Richmond Counties, Kings County Family Court
Margaret A. Burt ~ Counsel, New York Public Welfare Program
Dawn J. Post ~ Co-Borough Director, Children's Law Center
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:42:20] Indian Child Welfare Act Margaret A. Burt ~ Counsel, New York Public Welfare Program
On-Demand MP3 MP4

Whether representing children, parents or a child welfare or foster care agency, in private practice, government, public interest practice or as a policy advocate, the issues and the environment in which advocates operate is increasingly complex.  This year, PLI’s 15th Annual Children’s Law Institute will focus on a variety of social and legal issues affecting child welfare practice.

Lecture Topics  [Total time 06:23:10]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Introduction and Custody Cases for the Child Welfare Attorney [02:27:20]
    Elizabeth Fassler, Margaret P. O'Marra, Rebecca S. Rubloff, Diane Costanzo, Susan Sommer, Anna Maria Diamanti, Dawn J. Post, Hon. Anne-Marie Jolly
  • Utilizing Forensics in Custody Cases [00:59:56]
    Dr. Marcia Werchol, Katherine F. Wurmfeld
  • Visitation [01:13:34]
    Dawn J. Post, Margaret A. Burt, Hon. Paula J. Hepner
  • Indian Child Welfare Act [01:42:20]
    Margaret A. Burt

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • Custody and Visitation Outline
    Hon. Paula J. Hepner, Hon. Anne-Marie Jolly
  • Calm in the Face of the Storm: Strategies on How to Effectively Represent Children in High Conflict Custody and Visitation Cases
    Dawn J. Post
  • Custody and Visitation (Chapter 13 of New York Civil Practice & Family Court Proceedings)
    Rebecca S. Rubloff
  • Debra H. Against Janice R.--New York Court of Appeals Amici Curiae Brief
    Susan Sommer
  • Debra H. Against Janice R.--Court of Appeals of New York
    Susan Sommer
  • Oren Adar; Mickey Ray Smith v. Darlene W. Smith--U.S. Court of Appeals For the Fifth Circuit
    Susan Sommer
  • In the Matter of the Adoption of Sebastian, an Infant.--Surrogate's Court of New York, New York County
    Susan Sommer
  • State Registrar Letter Regarding Same-Sex Relationships
    Susan Sommer
  • Birth Certificates and Second-Parent Adoptions for Married Same-Sex Couples in Maryland
    Susan Sommer
  • Custody Evaluations and Domestic Violence: Practices, Beliefs and Recommendations of Professional Evaluators
    Kim Susser, Katherine F. Wurmfeld
  • Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Family Law Proceedings
    Katherine F. Wurmfeld
  • In the Matter of Gorsky v. Kessler
    Katherine F. Wurmfeld
  • Rosenblitt v. Rosenblitt
    Katherine F. Wurmfeld
  • Selected Articles
    Katherine F. Wurmfeld
  • Notice of Motion for Raw Data
    Katherine F. Wurmfeld
  • In the Matter of Wissink v. Wissink--Opinion of the Court
    Katherine F. Wurmfeld
  • Does Biological Family Involvement Impact or Destabilize Adoptive Placements
    Dawn J. Post
  • Custody Provisions
    Dawn J. Post
  • Visitation Schedule/Worksheet
    Dawn J. Post
  • NYS--"TOP TEN" ICWA Questions
    Margaret A. Burt
  • ICWA Compliance Information for Caseworkers
    Margaret A. Burt
  • Sample QEW Expert Qualification Questions
    Margaret A. Burt
  • NYS 18 NYCRR 431.18--Care and Protection of Children
    Margaret A. Burt
  • NYS Social Services Law Section 2 (35) and (36)
    Margaret A. Burt
  • NYS Social Services Law Section 39--Indian Affairs
    Margaret A. Burt
  • The Indian Child Welfare Act in New York State (PowerPoint Slides)
    Margaret A. Burt
  • Index to Children's Law Institute (15th Annual)

Presentation Material

  • The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) and Relocation
    Anna Maria Diamanti
  • Hypotheticals
  • Calm in the Face of the Storm: Strategies on How to Effectively Represent Children in High Conflict Custody and Visitation Cases
    Dawn J. Post
  • Utilizing Forensics in Custody Cases
  • Loaded Art. 6/V’s and Loaded Traditional or Subsidized Guardianships: Optional Language to Consider for Article 6 /V Docket Custody Orders and Traditional or Subsidized Guardianship Orders that Resolve Art. 10’s (Handout)
    Margaret A. Burt
  • Grandparent Visitation
  • Does Biological Family Involvement Impact or Destabilize Adoptive Placements
  • The Indian Child Welfare Act in New York State
    Margaret A. Burt
Co-Chair(s)
Elizabeth Fassler ~ Co-Director, Queens Practice, The Center for Family Representation, Inc.
Margaret P. O'Marra ~ Supervising Social Worker, The Legal Aid Society
Rebecca S. Rubloff ~ Director of Training, NYC Administration for Children's Services
Speaker(s)
Margaret A. Burt ~ Counsel, New York Public Welfare Program
Diane Costanzo ~ Referee, NYS Unified Court System
Anna Maria Diamanti ~ Director, Family Law and Domestic Violence Unit, South Brooklyn Legal Services
Hon. Paula J. Hepner ~ Supervising Judge of Kings & Richmond Counties, Kings County Family Court
Hon. Anne-Marie Jolly ~ Queens Family Court
Dawn J. Post ~ Co-Borough Director, Children's Law Center
Susan Sommer ~ Director of Constitutional Litigation and Senior Counsel, Lambda Legal
Dr. Marcia Werchol ~ Senior Director, Family Court Mental Health Services, NYC Health and Hospitals Corporation
Katherine F. Wurmfeld ~ Senior Attorney, New York Legal Assistance Group

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina8, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.
Minnesota  approves live webcasts ONLY

The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.

1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Related Items

Handbook  Course Handbook Archive

Children's Law Institute (15th Annual) Rebecca S. Rubloff, NYC Administration for Children's Services
Margaret P. O'Marra, The Legal Aid Society
Elizabeth Fassler, The Center for Family Representation, Inc.
 
Print Share Email
"All around this was a great program. Even though I practice in Montana 85% of the material was valuable to me."
Julie Brown, Practising Attorney