On-Demand   On-Demand Web Programs

Fundamentals of Trademark Law in the Global Marketplace 2013

Released on: Jul. 23, 2013
Running Time: 06:23:45

Running Time Segment Title Faculty Format
[01:24:05] Key Principles of Trademark Law and Unfair Competition Anne Hiaring Hocking ~ Hiaring + Smith, LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:16:10] Trademarks in Practice: Searching, Clearance and the Application Process in the United States Richard L. Kirkpatrick ~ Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[00:59:10] International Searching and Filing Strategies Christopher E. George ~ Managing Counsel for Trademarks and Brands, Intel Corporation
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:13:35] Trademark Infringement Primer Vijay K. Toke ~ Hiaring + Smith, LLP
On-Demand MP3 MP4
[01:29:45] Litigation Alternatives and Hot Topics in the U.S. and Abroad Beth M. Goldman ~ Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Vineeta Gajwani ~ IP Legal Counsel, Electronic Arts Inc.
On-Demand MP3 MP4
Whether you are just starting out, need a refresher, or have just learned how exciting a career in trademark law can be, this program is for you. Forget all the trademark books and articles, and view this program instead to learn all the fundamentals while exploring the cutting-edge issues that are changing the face of this practice area.

This program is built on a rock-solid foundation of trademark law experience. The speakers come with dozens of years in the field, and they will share that experience with you by answering your questions, both during their presentations and informally afterwards.

Faculty members have protected famous brand names in federal court, written articles and treatises on trademarks, and managed portfolios containing some of the nation’s best-known trademarks. They will cover the basics, ranging from federal registration to cease and desist letters, as well as the hottest topics that face the practice area today.

Lecture Topics 
[Total time 06:23:45]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

  • Introduction* [00:01:00]
    Anne Hiaring Hocking
  • Key Principles of Trademark Law and Unfair Competition [01:24:05]
    Anne Hiaring Hocking
  • Trademarks in Practice: Searching, Clearance and the Application Process in the United States [01:16:10]
    Richard L. Kirkpatrick
  • International Searching and Filing Strategies [00:59:10]
    Christopher E. George
  • Trademark Infringement Primer [01:13:35]
    Vijay K. Toke
  • Litigation Alternatives and Hot Topics in the U.S. and Abroad [01:29:45]
    Beth M. Goldman, Vineeta Gajwani

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

  • Key Principles of Trademark Law and Unfair Competition (June 14, 2013)
    Jeffery A. Handelman
  • Understanding Trademark Law in the Global Marketplace: An Introduction to Trademarks
    Adam D. Resnick
  • Fundamentals of Trademark Law in the Global Marketplace (Powerpoint Slides) (July 16, 2013)
    Adam D. Resnick
  • A Guide to Trademark Clearance, Risk Assessment and the Application Process (April 8, 2013)
    Ashly Iacullo Boesche
  • Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Law—Chapter 2: The Multiple Factor Test (November, 2012)
    Richard L. Kirkpatrick
  • Examination Guide 1–13: Webpage Specimens as Displays Associated with the Goods (December, 2012)
    Richard L. Kirkpatrick
  • International Trademark Searching & Filing Strategies
    Helen Hill Minsker, Linda A. Kuczma
  • Understanding Trademark Law in the Global Marketplace 2013 (July 16, 2013)
    Clark W. Lackert
  • Understanding Trademark Law in the Global Marketplace 2013 (Powerpoint Slides) (July 16, 2013)
    Clark W. Lackert
  • International Clearance & Filing Strategies (Powerpoint Slides)
    Christopher E. George
  • Trademark and Unfair Competition Litigation: A Primer
    Vijay K. Toke
  • Trademark Infringement Primer
    Jane Shay Wald
  • Alternatives to Federal Court: What’s Involved in TTAB and UDRP Proceedings
    Richard S. Mandel
  • New Trademark Clearinghouse an Important Tool for Trademark Owners as New Generic Top-Level Domains Prepare to Launch (March 19, 2013)
    Beth M. Goldman
  • Supreme Court Decision May Allow Infringement Plaintiffs to Use a Covenant Not to Sue to Avoid an Invalidity Ruling (January 10, 2013)
    Beth M. Goldman
  • Seeing Red: When it’s a Trademark and When it’s Not (October 22, 2012)
    Beth M. Goldman
  • 2013 Litigation Alternatives and Hot Topics in the U.S. and Abroad (Powerpoint Slides)
    Deborah Wilcox
  • What Happens When Everything Goes Wrong (Powerpoint Slides)
    Richard S. Mandel

Presentation Material

  • Key Principles of Trademark Law and Unfair Competition (Handout)
    Anne Hiaring Hocking
  • Key Principles of Trademark Law and Unfair Competition
    Anne Hiaring Hocking
  • Trademarks in Practice: Searching, Clearance and the Application Process in the United States (Handout)
    Richard L. Kirkpatrick
  • Trademarks in Practice: Searching, Clearance and the Application Process in the United States
    Richard L. Kirkpatrick
  • The Madrid Protocol: What’s New For U.S. Trademark Owners?
    Christopher E. George
  • Trademark Infringement Primer
    Vijay K. Toke
  • Litigation Alternatives and Hot Topics in the U.S. and Abroad
    Beth M. Goldman, Vineeta Gajwani
Chairperson(s)
Anne Hiaring Hocking ~ Hiaring + Smith, LLP
Speaker(s)
Vineeta Gajwani ~ IP Legal Counsel, Electronic Arts Inc.
Christopher E. George ~ Managing Counsel for Trademarks and Brands, Intel Corporation
Beth M. Goldman ~ Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
Richard L. Kirkpatrick ~ Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
Vijay K. Toke ~ Hiaring + Smith, LLP

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments.  Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama1, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa2*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri3, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire4, New Jersey, New Mexico5, New York6,  North Carolina7, North Dakota, Ohio8, Oklahoma9, Oregon*, Pennsylvania10, Rhode Island11, South Carolina, Tennessee12, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia13, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin14 and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota 
approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.


1Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

 

2Iowa:  The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

3Missouri:  On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year.  Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements.  Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

 

4New Hamphsire:  The approval is for three years from recorded date.

5New Mexico:  On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. 


6New York:  Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. 

7North Carolina:  A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. 


8Ohio:  To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us.  Online programs are considered self-study.  Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period.  The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

9Oklahoma:  Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.


10Pennsylvania:  PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.
 

11Rhode Island:  Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit.  On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

12Tennessee:  The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

13Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

14Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed.  The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit.  There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period.  Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.


Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.


If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.


Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

 
Print Share Email