Advanced Search

Seminars & Webcasts

On-Demand Learning

Publications

Patent Bar Review

Blogs

On-Demand Web Programs

Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2013

Released on: Jun. 19, 2013

Running Time: 06:18:20

Segments
Overview
Faculty
CLE Credit

Running Time	Segment Title	Faculty
[01:00:33]	Patent Prosecution for Litigators	Sanjeet K. Dutta ~ King & Spalding LLP
[01:09:50]	Elements and Burdens in a Patent Infringement Case and the Defendant's Response	Joshua M. Masur ~ Turner Boyd LLP
[01:04:05]	Anatomy and Timeline for a District Court Patent Infringement Case	Ian N. Feinberg ~ Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP
[00:57:05]	The Markman Process and Hearing	Madison C. Jellins ~ Jellins Christensen LLP
[01:02:30]	The ITC and Other Forum, Venue and Remedy Issues	Gary M. Hnath ~ Mayer Brown LLP
[01:01:10]	Post-Grant Review and Critical Issues That Win a Patent Infringement Case for a Plaintiff and a Defendant	Joseph P. Lavelle ~ DLA Piper (US) LLP

Are you a litigator and have always wondered how patent litigation differs from your practice? Or maybe you have considered pursuing patent litigation but first wanted to find out how it differs from other types of commercial litigation? This exciting program will explore what makes patent litigation, whether in District Court or at the ITC, different from other types of litigation, from the Rule 11 pre-filing investigation through the appeal to the Federal Circuit. You will learn important practical details including who to sue and what to put in the complaint. Learn what discovery is needed in a patent case and how discovery differs from other civil litigation. Disclosures of infringement and invalidity contentions, the claim construction process at and leading up to the Markman hearing will also be examined. Find out what is needed to prove infringement and how a patent may be invalidated by prior art or rendered unenforceable by inequitable conduct. Hear what can be expected at trial and what remedies are available. We will also discuss alternative forums, including the International Trade Commission, and review appeals to the Federal Circuit, and how it and the Supreme Court are reshaping patent law and patent litigation.

Lecture Topics [Total time 06:18:20]

Segments with an asterisk (*) are available only with the purchase of the entire program.

Opening Remarks and Introduction* [00:03:07]
Ian N. Feinberg
Patent Prosecution for Litigators [01:00:33]
Sanjeet K. Dutta
Elements and Burdens in a Patent Infringement Case and the Defendant's Response [01:09:50]
Joshua M. Masur
Anatomy and Timeline for a District Court Patent Infringement Case [01:04:05]
Ian N. Feinberg
The Markman Process and Hearing [00:57:05]
Madison C. Jellins
The ITC and Other Forum, Venue and Remedy Issues [01:02:30]
Gary M. Hnath
Post-Grant Review and Critical Issues That Win a Patent Infringement Case for a Plaintiff and a Defendant [01:01:10]
Joseph P. Lavelle

The purchase price of this Web Program includes the following articles from the Course Handbook available online:

Patent Prosecution for Litigators
Robert Lord, Sanjeet K. Dutta
Patent Litigation Fundamentals: A Focus on the Elements and Burdens in a Patent Infringement Case
Joseph M. Drayton
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Related Excerpts (December 1, 2012)
Joshua M. Masur
Manual of Patent Examining Procedure, Related Excerpts (January, 2013)
Joshua M. Masur
In Re Bill of Lading Transmission and Processing System Patent Litigation, 681 F.3d 1323 (June 7, 2012)
Joshua M. Masur
Wireless Ink Corporation v. Facebook, Inc., 787 F. Supp. 2d 298 (May 26, 2011)
Joshua M. Masur
Claim Construction and Markman
Marla R. Butler
Anatomy and Timeline for a District Court Patent Infringement Case (PowerPoint Slides)
Ian N. Feinberg, John J. Molenda, Ph.D.
Section 337 Investigations (April 2013)
Gary M. Hnath
Critical Issues in Patent Cases: IPR, Venue, and Transfer Under the America Invents Act (February 17, 2013)
Joseph P. Lavelle

Presentation Material

Patent Prosecution for Litigators
Sanjeet K. Dutta
Elements and Burdens in a Patent Infringement Case and the Defendant's Response
Joshua M. Masur
The Markman Process and Hearing
Madison C. Jellins
Anatomy and Timeline for a District Court Patent Infringement Case
Ian N. Feinberg
The ITC and Other Forum, Venue and Remedy Issues
Gary M. Hnath
Post-Grant Review and Critical Issues That Win a Patent Infringement Case for a Plaintiff and a Defendant
Joseph P. Lavelle

Co-Chair(s)

Ian N. Feinberg ~ Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP

Gary M. Hnath ~ Mayer Brown LLP

Speaker(s)

Sanjeet K. Dutta ~ King & Spalding LLP

Madison C. Jellins ~ Jellins Christensen LLP

Joseph P. Lavelle ~ DLA Piper (US) LLP

Joshua M. Masur ~ Turner Boyd LLP

PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments. Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state.

On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in:

Alabama¹, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho*, Illinois , Iowa²*, Kansas, Kentucky*, Louisiana, Maine*, Mississippi, Missouri³, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire⁴, New Jersey, New Mexico⁵, New York⁶, North Carolina⁷, North Dakota, Ohio⁸, Oklahoma⁹, Oregon*, Pennsylvania¹⁰, Rhode Island¹¹, South Carolina, Tennessee¹², Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia¹³, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin¹⁴ and Wyoming*.

Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs.

Minnesota approves live webcasts ONLY

Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45.

*PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs.

¹Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits.

²Iowa: The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

³Missouri: On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year. Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements. Self-study can not be used for carryover credit.

⁴New Hamphsire: The approval is for three years from recorded date.

⁵New Mexico: On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year.

⁶New York: Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats.

⁷North Carolina: A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs.

⁸Ohio: To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us. Online programs are considered self-study. Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period. The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program.

⁹Oklahoma: Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs.

¹⁰Pennsylvania: PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour.

¹¹Rhode Island: Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit. On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component.

¹²Tennessee: The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented.

¹³Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions.

¹⁴Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed. The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit. There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts.

Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers.

If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued.

Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu.

Live Seminars

Patent Litigation 2014 (New York, NY)	Nov. 10 - 11, 2014
Patent Litigation 2014 (Chicago, IL)	Oct. 9 - 10, 2014
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2014 (San Francisco, CA)	Jun. 4, 2014
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2014 (New York, NY)	Apr. 21, 2014
Patent Law Institute (8th Annual) (San Francisco, CA)	Mar. 17 - 18, 2014
Patent Law Institute (8th Annual) (New York, NY)	Feb. 3 - 4, 2014
Patent Litigation 2013 (New York, NY)	Nov. 11 - 12, 2013
Patent Litigation 2013 (Chicago, IL)	Oct. 9 - 10, 2013

On-Demand Programs

Patent Law Institute 2013 (7th Annual)	Apr. 2, 2013
Patent Litigation 2012	Oct. 12, 2012

Course Handbook Archive

Patent Litigation 2014
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2013
Patent Law Institute (8th Annual)
Patent Litigation 2013
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2013	Ian N. Feinberg, Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP Gary M. Hnath, Mayer Brown LLP
Patent Law Institute (7th Annual)	Scott M. Alter, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP Douglas R. Nemec, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP John M. White,
Patent Litigation 2012	Christopher K. Hu, Dickstein Shapiro LLP Jeanne M. Gills, Foley & Lardner LLP Edward G. Poplawski, Sidley Austin LLP
Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2012	Ian N. Feinberg, Feinberg Day Alberti & Thompson LLP Gary M. Hnath, Mayer Brown LLP

Related Treatises

Fashion Law and Business: Brands & Retailers

Social Media and the Law

Post-Grant Proceedings Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board

FOLLOW PLI:

Practice Areas

Location

Credit Type

Format

Practice Areas

Credit Type

Format

Specialty

Practice Areas

Format

Subscriptions

On-Demand Web Programs

Fundamentals of Patent Litigation 2013

On-Demand Segment

CREDIT INFORMATION

Related Items

Live Seminars

On-Demand Programs

Course Handbook Archive

CREDIT INFORMATION

Check Specific State Credit Requirements

Related Treatises


	Practice Areas Accounting Banking Bankruptcy & Restructuring Corporate & Securities Employment Ethics/Professional Responsibility Health Care Intellectual Property International Litigation Patent Pro Bono Professional Skills Real Estate Tax Location New York, NY San Francisco, CA Chicago, IL Washington, DC Los Angeles, CA Credit Type Elimination of Bias Ethics General Professional Practice Skills Substance Abuse Format Seminars Webcasts Groupcasts One-Hour Briefings


	The Exam Live Courses Homestudy Course Testimonials FAQ's For Engineers & Scientists


	Securities Law Practice Center Patent Law Practice Center PLI Librarian


	On-Demand Segment Description Faculty CLE Credit PLI makes every effort to accredit its recorded programs. PLI MP3s are approved in the following states/territories: AK, CA¹, CO, FL, GA, ID, IL, KS², ME, MO, MT, NC, ND, NH, NJ, NM, NV, NY, OR, PA, TX³, UT, VI, VT, WA, WV, WY. Some exceptions apply. For more information contact PLI. ¹California: This activity qualifies for participatory credit. ²Kansas: There is a 5.0 credit limit per year for this type of viewing. ³Texas: Considered self-study credit. There is a 5 credit limit, including specialty credit. Please note:* The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. *PLI will apply for credit upon request. Running time and CLE credit hours earned are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon speakers. Special Note: In New York, non-traditional course formats including audio and video cassettes are NOT acceptable for transitional CLE credit for the newly admitted attorney within the first two years after their admission to the Bar. Attorneys other than newly admitted may use non-traditional course format, including audio and video cassettes to fulfill their CLE requirements. IMPORTANT INFORMATION FOR ATTORNEYS SEEKING CLE CREDIT While listening to the program, be alert to listen for the AUTHORIZATION CODE which has been placed somewhere within the program. Write the code down; you will be asked for this information when you request CLE credit. Once you’ve completed the program, please go to www.pli.edu and log in. Once you are logged in, your account will be displayed and the available programs will be listed on the left side under the heading "My Online Library". If you are already logged in, click the link for My Account on the home page to access your Online Library. Return to the program and click the MCLE Registration button in the top right region of the program window. A new window will open with a CLE Request form, you will be asked to complete a short evaluation, and fill in the AUTHORIZATION CODE, please complete and submit the form. Once you click the Submit button, your request for CLE credit will be sent to the CLE department. PLI will email you a CLE certificate within 48 hours. If you are unable to successfully log in, please contact our customer service department at 800-260-4754 for assistance. GENERAL INFORMATION This product is designed to provide practical and useful information on the subject matter covered. However, it is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued. PLI makes every effort to accredit its On-Demand Web Programs and Segments. Please check the CLE Calculator above for CLE information specific to your state. On-Demand Web Programs and Segments are approved in: Alabama¹, Alaska, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois , Iowa², Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Mississippi, Missouri³, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire⁴, New Jersey, New Mexico⁵, New York⁶, North Carolina⁷, North Dakota, Ohio⁸, Oklahoma⁹, Oregon, Pennsylvania¹⁰, Rhode Island¹¹, South Carolina, Tennessee¹², Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia¹³, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin¹⁴ and Wyoming. Iowa, Mississippi, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin DO NOT approve Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs. Minnesota approves live webcasts ONLY Please Note: The State Bar of Arizona does not approve or accredit CLE activities for the Mandatory Continuing Legal Education requirement. PLI programs may qualify for credit based on the requirements outlined in the MCLE Regulations and Ariz. R. Sup. Ct. Rule 45. *PLI will apply for credit upon request. Louisiana and New Hampshire: PLI will apply for credit upon request for audio-only on-demand web programs. ¹Alabama: Approval of all web based programs is limited to a maximum of 6.0 credits. ²Iowa: The approval is for one year from recorded date. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts. ³Missouri: On-demand web programs are restricted to six hours of self-study credit per year. Self-study may not be used to satisfy the ethics requirements. Self-study can not be used for carryover credit. ⁴New Hamphsire: The approval is for three years from recorded date. ⁵New Mexico: On-Demand web programs are restricted to 4.0 self-study credits per year. ⁶New York: Newly admitted attorneys may not take non-traditional course formats such as on-demand Web Programs or live Webcasts for CLE credit. Newly admitted attorneys not practicing law in the United States, however, may earn 12 transitional credits in non-traditional formats. ⁷North Carolina: A maximum of 4 credits per reporting period may be earned by participating in on-demand web programs. ⁸Ohio: To confirm that the web program has been approved, please refer to the list of Ohio’s Approved Self Study Activities at http://www.sconet.state.oh.us. Online programs are considered self-study. Ohio attorneys have a 6 credit self-study limit per compliance period. The Ohio CLE Board states that attorneys must have a 100% success rate in clicking on timestamps to receive ANY CLE credit for an online program. ⁹Oklahoma: Up to 6 credits may be earned each year through computer-based or technology-based legal education programs. ¹⁰Pennsylvania: PA attorneys may only receive a maximum of four (4) hours of distance learning credit per compliance period. All distance learning programs must be a minimum of 1 full hour. ¹¹Rhode Island: Audio Only On-Demand Web Programs are not approved for credit. On-Demand Web Programs must have an audio and video component. ¹²Tennessee: The approval is for the calendar year in which the live program was presented. ¹³Virginia: All distance learning courses are to be done in an educational setting, free from distractions. ¹⁴Wisconsin: Ethics credit is not allowed. The ethics portion of the program will be approved for general credit. There is a 10 credit limit for on-demand web programs during every 2-year reporting period. Does not approve of Audio-only On-Demand Webcasts. Running time and CLE credit hours are not necessarily the same. Please be aware that many states do not permit credit for luncheon and keynote speakers. If you have already received credit for attending some or the entire program, please be aware that state administrators do not permit you to accrue additional credit for repeat viewing even if an additional credit certificate is subsequently issued. Note that some states limit the number of credit hours attorneys may claim for online CLE activities, and state rules vary with regard to whether online CLE activities qualify for participatory or self-study credits. For more information, call Customer Service (800) 260-4PLI (4754) or e-mail info@pli.edu. Add to Cart Membership Suite Options: Add to My List Register From Roster Request Groupcast Receive all of the items below at the reduced price of $0.00 A combined savings of $0.00 Buy Combo CREDIT INFORMATION Credits for: